JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.0 CiteScore 3.5

JMIR Formative Research (JFR, ISSN 2561-326X, Journal Impact Factor™ 2.0 (Clarivate, 2024)) publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINEPubMed, PubMed CentralDOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

With a CiteScore of 3.5 (2024) JMIR Formative Research is a Q2 journal in the field of Medicine (miscellaneous), according to Scopus data.

Recent Articles

Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The project “Personalised Integrated Care Promoting Quality of Life for Older People” aimed to develop an integrated care system based on information and communication technology to support older people living with Parkinson’s disease or Dementia disease. One module focuses on physical activity (PA) recommendations.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Patients using buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) or long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain are at risk for poor outcomes if care is interrupted. Both treatments are highly regulated, with prepandemic requirements for in-person care. COVID-19 may have resulted in barriers to accessing in-person care through disruptions in care delivery. However, there were also opportunities for improved access to telemedicine visits through policy changes.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Experience Sampling Methods (ESM) have been used in clinical research to collect data on emotional and behavioural states in real life contexts among different populations. Although the use of ESM in mental health has increased, it has not been applied to larger samples of young people in disadvantaged urban settings.

|
Article Thumbnail
Reviews on Usage or other Formative Evaluation Metrics

The number of studies on the use of smart wearables has increased dramatically in recent years. However, aspects including personal safety and fashion perspectives of wearable devices have not yet been adequately addressed in the literature. There have been debates regarding the potential health risks and fashionability of using wearable devices. Regardless of the actual impact of such devices, these aspects may influence users’ perceptions toward the purchase and use of wearable technology.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Opportunities for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) training are limited for medical and nursing students due to patient safety concerns and the complexities of neonatal care. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted clinical training opportunities, further underscoring the need for alternative educational tools that can provide immersive and practical learning experiences. Serious games have garnered attention as potential tools for medical education; however, few are designed to simulate the complete NICU environment and its unique challenges.

|
Article Thumbnail
Case Report

The widespread adoption of smartphones and tablet devices, along with advancements in data communication technology, has resulted in a paradigm shift in the treatment of dizziness. External factors, such as the spread of COVID-19, have accelerated this transformation in recent years. We have been pursuing telemedicine and online medical care to treat dizziness and have developed different products and services necessary for each treatment process stage. Several patients face difficulties in accessing medical facilities during severe vertigo episodes. Furthermore, clinical findings, such as nystagmus or other symptoms, may be absent when symptoms subside by the time of their appointment.

|
Article Thumbnail
Research Letter

Choosing a specialty is a key decision for United States (U.S.) medical students, finalized in the fourth year through the National Resident Matching Program. Influencing factors include experience, gender, lifestyle, finances, and personality. Aligning personality with specialty can boost job satisfaction and patient care. With 51% of pre-clerkship students eyeing competitive fields, making early insights valuable. The five-factor model includes extraversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. Neuroticism—linked to anxiety and emotional instability—affects decision-making, but its role in specialty choice is underexplored. Studies show surgeons tend to have low neuroticism, while future obstetricians and psychiatrists show higher levels. This study examines the relationship between neuroticism and specialty choice among medical students at a U.S. allopathic medical school. The goal is to provide insights for personalized medical career counseling and interventions tailored to student needs.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

3D technology including models and images can facilitate healthcare consultations by promoting a better understanding of information by patients and shared decision-making. However, little is yet known about the general public’s perspectives about the acceptability of such innovative technology and how it can best be adopted into routine healthcare consultations. There is a need to explore both public and patient perceptions to avoid the risk of implementing 3D technologies that may not be acceptable or fit-for-purpose.

|
Article Thumbnail
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Amblyopia, a unilateral or bilateral visual disorder, affects up to 5% of the general population and is a leading cause of childhood visual impairment. Current treatments, such as patching therapy, aim to improve amblyopia by temporarily occluding the unaffected eye, thereby promoting the use of the amblyopic eye. However, adherence to patch therapy can be challenging, as the forced use of the amblyopic eye can be stressful for children. Moreover, despite improvements in visual acuity by patch therapy, children with amblyopia often face difficulties with hand-eye coordination; therefore, a treatment that reduces stress for them while simultaneously improving hand-eye coordination could address the limitations of existing amblyopia therapies.

|
Article Thumbnail
Case Report

Evidence-based tube feeding (TF) weaning involves reducing the volume of tube feeds to induce hunger, with interdisciplinary monitoring to allow for proactive medical, nutritional, and behavioral intervention as needed. This can be done outpatient; however, the current standard of care requires a high degree of medical monitoring and care coordination, which can be challenging to implement. The CHAMP® App is a mobile application designed for remote patient monitoring with children born with congenital heart conditions who are at high risk for medical morbidity and mortality. The CHAMP app remote patient monitoring program would be ideally suited to improve medical monitoring and care coordination.

|
Article Thumbnail
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Recent advancements in sports medicine have been fueled by innovative technologies, particularly consumer-grade wearable devices like Fitbit, Apple Watch, and Garmin. These devices offer physiological and biomechanical data and hold promise for personalized, real-time, and remote assessment of athlete recovery. However, few studies have been conducted with these devices in adolescent student athletes.

|
Article Thumbnail
Pilot studies (non-ehealth)

Many studies find associations between hepatitis B and stigma, but studies from the Western European context are lacking. Based on available studies, we hypothesized that younger age, higher education, male gender, higher privacy needs, and non-German mother tongue were positively associated with perceived hepatitis B-related stigma.

|

Preprints Open for Peer-Review

|

Open Peer Review Period:

-

We are working in partnership with