Accessibility settings

JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.4 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 4.2 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Formative Research publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, DOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a 2025 Impact Factor of 2.4, ranking Q2 in Health Care Sciences & Services (97/194).

JMIR Formative Research received a Scopus CiteScore of 4.2 (2025), placing it in the 68th percentile (149/466) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Medicine, and in the 52nd percentile (81/168) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Health Informatics. 


Recent Articles

Woman on video call with friend on a tablet
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Depression, anxiety, and stress-related difficulties represent a major global health burden. Online psychological therapy has emerged as a promising approach to increasing access to care, yet evidence from routine, real-world clinical settings, particularly for services delivered without standardized treatment protocols, remains limited.

Nurse checks on elderly patient in hospital bed with IV drip, TV on
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Remote vital sign monitoring of acute hospital at home (aHAH) patients is recommended in policy without clear guidance on implementation. While such monitoring has the potential to improve patient care, there is limited evidence for its feasibility and acceptability.

Man in wheelchair exercises with dumbbells, focusing on arm strength
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Mobile health technologies offer scalable opportunities to support home-based exercise programs. However, most commercially available apps are not tailored to individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and have rarely been evaluated for usability and implementation outcomes in this population.

Child using a tablet to learn, with colorful graphs on screen.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

In clinical settings, clinicians’ context-specific trust in AI is associated with individual factors. This is particularly relevant in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) screening, where diagnostic criteria are complex, heterogeneous, and inherently uncertain. Although some AI systems demonstrate high sensitivity, clinicians are not always convinced of their utility. Therefore, examining potential biases in context-specific trust and achieving well-calibrated trust are critical.

Man stretching in gym, smartwatch shows Resting HR Prediction: 67 bpm
Case Report

For endurance athletes, resting heart rate (RHR) is a well-known indicator of training load, physiological status, and readiness for upcoming training. Predicting the following day’s RHR would enable athletes and coaches to optimize training plans and make timely load adjustments.

Woman uses Sympler app on smartphone for palliative care self-referral
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Palliative care improves patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by delivering specialty-level management for cancer symptoms. Digital symptom monitoring programs (SMPs) improve patients’ HRQoL through early symptom identification during cancer care. Through complementary approaches, SMPs and palliative care align with symptom management theory by linking the patient-reported symptom experience with clinician recommendations for symptom management to improve health outcomes for patients with serious illness. While both SMPs and palliative care reduce health care use and improve survival through detection and treatment of cancer symptoms, few studies have attempted to integrate palliative care into SMPs for cancer symptom management.

Elderly woman with glasses smiling while using a tablet on a couch.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Health literacy (HL) is a crucial determinant of population health; however, disparities persist in multilingual settings. In South Tyrol, Italy, where German- and Italian-speaking populations coexist within a unified health care system, HL disparities may reflect differences in language, culture, and digital engagement.

Elderly woman smiling while using a tablet computer on a yellow couch
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Remote, scalable cognitive assessment could improve detection and longitudinal monitoring of age-related cognitive change, but few studies have validated comprehensive digital neuropsychological batteries administered entirely at home.

Woman practices yoga at home following an online instructor on her laptop.
Pilot studies (ehealth)

Chronic pain (CP) is a complex and prevalent public health condition that significantly impacts physical functioning, psychological well-being, and quality of life. Traditional biomedical treatments often provide limited relief, highlighting the need for integrative approaches. Biopsychosocial interventions, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), have shown promise in improving pain-related outcomes by targeting cognitive, emotional, and behavioral processes associated with CP.

Person breaking a cigarette in half, symbolizing quitting smoking.
Formative Evaluation of Non-Ehealth Innovations

Smoking prevalence is disproportionately high among individuals with mental disorders, who also show reduced cessation success, suggesting that current cessation interventions may not fully address their specific needs. A barrier to smoking cessation is the fear that quitting may worsen mental health, yet little is known about how individuals with mental disorders experience guideline-conform cessation treatments, which may address such concerns.

Man using smart home remote to control thermostat on wall
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Smart home technologies (SHTs) encompass internet-connected interfaces, sensors, monitors, devices, and appliances, which are networked together to allow for automation. They can facilitate tasks, such as taking medication or issuing fall alerts, and can control the home environment, such as by automating lighting. Their widespread use comes with concerns about power imbalances between users, technology companies, marketers, and state actors regarding data collection, its use and disclosure, and security issues, such as the potential for data breaches. SHT acceptance and adoption are shaped by user attitudes and trust, so understanding these factors is critical. A scoping review conducted by several authors of this paper explored user perceptions of SHTs and identified 4 key themes related to user attitudes: privacy concerns, knowledge of data collection, perceived risks and benefits, and perceived safety. Of the included studies in the review, none explored Canadian SHT users’ attitudes. Thus, little is known about how Canadians perceive and understand the privacy, data collection, and safety elements of their SHTs. Given Canada’s unique demographic diversity and distinct context, examining Canadian perspectives is necessary for advancing this body of research.

Couple on park path, man with phone, woman with laptop, scenic nature background
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Loneliness is recognized as a global health threat. Older adults are vulnerable to loneliness due to life changes common in old age. While individual risk factors for loneliness in old age are well-documented, contextual factors are scarcely explored, such as digitalization. Rapid digitalization underscores the need to explore the long-term association between the use of digital devices and loneliness.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with