Accessibility settings

JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.4 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 4.2 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Formative Research publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINEPubMed, PubMed CentralDOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a 2025 Impact Factor of 2.4, ranking Q2 in Health Care Sciences & Services (97/194).

JMIR Formative Research received a Scopus CiteScore of 4.2 (2025), placing it in the 68th percentile (149/466) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Medicine, and in the 52nd percentile (81/168) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Health Informatics. 


Recent Articles

A woman looks at a laptop displaying an anime-style family portrait with a baby.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Serious games are increasingly used in professional health education and maternal health promotion. However, most pregnancy-related digital interventions target specific behaviors and do not provide a comprehensive, longitudinal simulation of the pregnancy journey that incorporates psychosocial and administrative aspects.

Man with earbuds sitting on steps, looking at phone.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

mWorks is a co-designed, web-based self-management intervention developed to empower persons with common mental disorders who are on sick leave during the return-to-work process. However, limited knowledge of how mWorks is delivered and engaged with in real-world settings constrains further development and implementation. In line with the Medical Research Council framework for complex intervention evaluation, such an approach is required to examine (1) contextual factors influencing implementation, (2) fidelity and variation in delivery, and (3) how service users and professionals experience and respond to the intervention.

Woman using a smartphone with health and fitness data visualizations
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Remote measurement technology (RMT) is increasingly used in health research to collect real-world data relevant to clinical states (eg, sleep, activity, and stress). Concerns exist about the impact of remote tracking via personal devices and wearables on individuals with or at risk of eating disorders (EDs) by promoting a focus on exercise, diet, and appearance. There is a lack of research applying RMT to EDs.

Business meeting: Woman shows tablet to man with arms crossed in office
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Very low uptake in workplace semen analysis research is difficult to interpret, particularly in employer-adjacent settings, where nonparticipation may reflect limited recruitment reach, limited understanding of the occupational rationale, low perceived relevance, or procedure-related concerns.

Doctor consults with mother and child using futuristic holographic medical interface
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Parents increasingly consult the internet, both websites and, more recently, artificial intelligence chatbots, for information on autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the comparative quality of these two source types, especially across languages, remains underexplored.

Elderly man in distress, head in hands, by bedside table with framed photo
Formative Evaluation of Non-Ehealth Innovations

In older adults with chronic constipation, symptoms of defecation difficulty often persist despite improvements in bowel movement frequency. However, constipation-related symptoms have rarely been examined as independent outcomes.

Young woman checks heart rate on phone app while holding medication
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Heart failure is a chronic condition that significantly impacts patients’ quality of life and increases health care burden. Effective self-monitoring and lifestyle modification are essential components of heart failure management and can support improved health outcomes. Mobile health technologies, such as smartphone apps, are increasingly used to assist patients with heart failure in self-management. However, evidence regarding patient engagement, user experience, and the effectiveness of these mobile health tools remains limited and continues to evolve.

Man with glucose monitor checks phone in modern living room
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The current level of insulin knowledge, attitudes, and practices of patients self-administering their first insulin injection needs to be improved. There is an emerging need to develop a program for patients self-administering their first insulin injection based on the e-coach model derived from the temporal self-regulation theory.

Medical supplies: stethoscope, laptop, notebook, pen, and face mask
Formative Evaluation of Non-Ehealth Innovations

Understanding how medical students learn is critical for improving teaching strategies in clinical education. Despite the widespread use of learning style frameworks, such as visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic (VARK), evidence from sub-Saharan Africa remains limited, and the use of learning style approaches is debated in the literature. In clinical and health sciences education, aligning teaching with learners’ preferences can enhance knowledge retention, procedural competence, and ultimately the quality of patient care.

Woman with pink headscarf smiles at support group of women
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Sleep disturbances and low physical activity are common among breast cancer (BC) survivors and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Given the increased access to technological devices and the growing popularity of SMS text messaging–based mobile health interventions, these tools have the potential to both address sleep disturbances and promote physical activity in a scalable and cost-effective way. To understand and make effective use of these tools, it is important to consider the preferences of BC survivors with sleep disturbances, including how SMS text messaging–based mobile health interventions could deliver interventions involving physical activity and sleep hygiene.

Person viewing "RecoverySupport" app on smartphone with form fields for login
Pilot studies (ehealth)

Optimizing recovery following breast cancer surgery is critical for restoring usual function, minimizing complications, and enabling timely initiation of adjuvant therapies. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols are internationally endorsed recommendations and include patient-led behaviors such as early mobilization, early oral intake of fluids and food, postoperative rehabilitation exercises, and multimodal pain management. However, adherence to these behaviors is often suboptimal, and strategies to support patients are limited. Digital health interventions (DHIs) may offer scalable solutions.

Person holds smartphone displaying "Way To Health" app with stethoscope logo.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Out-of-pocket (OOP) costs pose a significant barrier to participating in cancer clinical trials (CCTs). Financial reimbursement programs (FRPs) that reduce the burden of OOP costs can support participation in CCTs if the information is readily available to participants at the time of enrollment. Prior studies have shown the importance and impact of FRPs, but despite improvements, significant barriers still remain.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with