Accessibility settings

JMIR Formative Research

Process evaluations, early results, and feasibility/pilot studies of digital and non-digital interventions

Editor-in-Chief:

Amaryllis Mavragani, PhD, Scientific Editor at JMIR Publications, Canada


Impact Factor 2.4 More information about Impact Factor CiteScore 4.2 More information about CiteScore

JMIR Formative Research publishes peer-reviewed, openly accessible papers containing results from process evaluations, feasibility/pilot studies and other kinds of formative research and preliminary results. While the original focus was on the design of medical- and health-related research and technology innovations, JMIR Formative Research publishes studies from all areas of medical and health research.

Formative research is research that occurs before a program is designed and implemented, or while a program is being conducted. Formative research can help

  • define and understand populations in need of an intervention or public health program
  • create programs that are specific to the needs of those populations
  • ensure programs are acceptable and feasible to users before launching
  • improve the relationship between users and agencies/research groups
  • demonstrate the feasibility, use, satisfaction with, or problems with a program before large-scale summative evaluation (looking at health outcomes)

Many funding agencies will expect some sort of pilot/feasibility/process evaluation before funding a larger study such as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT).

Formative research should be an integral part of developing or adapting programs and should be used while the program is ongoing to help refine and improve program activities. Thus, formative evaluation can and should also occur in the form of a process evaluation alongside a summative evaluation such as an RCT.

JMIR Formative Research fills an important gap in the academic journals landscape, as it publishes sound and peer-reviewed formative research that is critical for investigators to apply for further funding, but that is usually not published in outcomes-focused medical journals aiming for impact and generalizability.

Summative evaluations of programs and apps/software that have undergone a thorough formative evaluation before launch have a better chance to be published in high-impact flagship journals; thus, we encourage authors to submit - as a first step - their formative evaluations in JMIR Formative Research (and their evaluation protocols to JMIR Research Protocols). 

JMIR Formative Research is indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, DOAJ, Scopus, Sherpa/Romeo, EBSCO/EBSCO Essentials, and the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).

JMIR Formative Research received a 2025 Impact Factor of 2.4, ranking Q2 in Health Care Sciences & Services (97/194).

JMIR Formative Research received a Scopus CiteScore of 4.2 (2025), placing it in the 68th percentile (149/466) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Medicine, and in the 52nd percentile (81/168) as a second quartile (Q2) journal in the field of Health Informatics. 


Recent Articles

Alternative text does not exist
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Despite being established risk factors for poor mental or brain health outcomes in aging, rest-activity rhythm (RAR) disturbances are not routinely monitored or treated. This is, in part, due to a lack of clinician-friendly RAR monitoring systems.

Alternative text does not exist
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

A sedentary lifestyle is a global health crisis that contributes to chronic disease and premature mortality. Adolescents with mild intellectual disability attending Dutch practical education (PrO) schools face elevated health risks due to low levels of physical activity (PA) and limited conceptual, social, and practical skills. Digital health interventions offer scalable solutions, but require contextual adaptation informed by formative research. However, understanding of PA behavior in this population and context remains limited because existing research relies on partial lenses and lacks integration of theory, participatory methods, and multistakeholder insights.

Doctor in blue scrubs holding a stethoscope and smartphone
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The digitalization of health care has accelerated the adoption of mobile health (mHealth) apps in general and family medicine in Portugal. These tools may support chronic disease management and clinical decision-making. However, limited high-quality scientific evidence and the absence of a national framework for certification and quality standards create uncertainty about their safe integration into clinical practice.

Two men in business attire sit at a table, discussing work.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

The Dutch childcare benefits scandal (toeslagenschandaal) involved the wrongful labeling of thousands of parents as fraudsters in the childcare allowance system. This led to long-term harm for families and a profound trust crisis in governmental institutions. While the national recovery operation provided financial compensation, municipalities were tasked with offering broader support across life domains to youth who grew up in affected families. Central to this effort was helping them “come to terms” with the scandal by acknowledging, processing, and moving forward from its practical and emotional consequences. Yet, many youths remain hard to reach due to distrust and avoidance of institutional contact.

Doctor and patient discussing health concerns in a medical office.
Pilot studies (non-ehealth)

Defensive medicine (DM) is particularly relevant in obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), where physicians face substantial medicolegal risks and malpractice-related pressures. Defensive practices may involve cost-increasing diagnostic or therapeutic behaviors and avoidance of high-risk patients or procedures. Identifying factors independently associated with DM may help inform organizational and medicolegal interventions.

Elderly woman using a health app on her smartphone, with pills and water nearby.
Reviews on Usage or other Formative Evaluation Metrics

Nonadherence to immunosuppressants and other self-management behaviors remains a major challenge after kidney transplantation. Publicly available mobile apps may support long-term self-management, but their quality and functional breadth remain unclear.

Young Asian woman wearing headphones and holding a tablet on a couch
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Hope and confidence support personal recovery by helping individuals with mental illness to rediscover meaning, enhance social connections, and build fulfilling lives. Digital recovery narrative interventions may help stimulate these recovery processes by providing access to hopeful lived-experience stories.

Infographic: Remote glucose monitoring engagement & glycemic control analysis using causal inference.
Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions

Suboptimal glycemic control remains a significant public health challenge among adults with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes, with 47.4% of US adults with diagnosed diabetes having hemoglobin A (HbA) ≥7%. Remote glucose monitoring programs have shown promise for supporting self-management, but real-world evidence on the causal impact of varying patient engagement levels on glycemic outcomes remains limited.

Finger ring size measurement with ruler showing centimeters and inches.
Pilot studies (ehealth)

Emergency department (ED) boarding exposes admitted older adults to a high-disruption environment. Sleep loss during acute hospitalization is associated with adverse outcomes and may contribute to delirium, yet objective sleep measurement in this setting is difficult. Consumer multisensor wearables may permit low-burden, longitudinal measurement, but the feasibility and acceptability of ring-based monitoring among acutely ill older adults is unknown.

Elderly couple relaxing at home, woman using tablet
Pilot studies (non-ehealth)

Informal caregivers make up a large share of the care provided to people living with dementia, and experience an elevated risk for anxiety, depression, and caregiving burden. Technology-based interventions, such as mobile apps, aim to support informal caregivers by providing information, training, and mental or social support. Considering the diverse nature of the caregiver experience, AI is being incorporated into such interventions to create more tailored and specific support; however, AI hesitancy may serve as a significant barrier to usage.

Nurse in blue scrubs holding a mug and phone, taking a break.
Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools

Shift-work nurses experience substantial variability in work schedules, health behaviors, and recovery patterns, which traditional retrospective surveys fail to capture due to recall bias. Although mobile health (mHealth) tools offer ecological momentary data capture, existing off-the-shelf survey platforms lack shift-synchronized notification logic and impose excessive cognitive friction on fatigued clinicians, limiting their applicability in nursing research.

Doctor discusses health screening results with two women, with a health infographic on screen.
Pilot studies (non-ehealth)

Breast cancer survivorship requires attention to treatment-related changes in body composition, nutritional status, and quality of life. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle is influenced by tissue electrical properties and fluid distribution and may provide complementary whole-body and segmental information.

Preprints Open for Peer Review

We are working in partnership with