Published on in Vol 5, No 7 (2021): July

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/27094, first published .
Health Care Professionals’ Experiences With the Use of Video Consultation: Qualitative Study

Health Care Professionals’ Experiences With the Use of Video Consultation: Qualitative Study

Health Care Professionals’ Experiences With the Use of Video Consultation: Qualitative Study

Journals

  1. Parsons J, Rahman S, Bryce C, Atherton H. Use of a pharmacy-based GP video consultation service: a mixed methods study. Family Practice 2022 View
  2. White V, Bastable A, Solo I, Sherwell S, Thomas S, Blum R, Torres J, Maxwell-Davis N, Alexander K, Piper A. Telehealth cancer care consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of the experiences of Australians affected by cancer. Supportive Care in Cancer 2022;30(8):6659 View
  3. Banbury A, Smith A, Taylor M, Der Vartanian C, Ng K, Vitangcol K, Haydon H, Thomas E, Caffery L. Cancer care and management during COVID-19: A comparison of in-person, video and telephone consultations. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2022;28(10):733 View
  4. Shannon M, Callum S, Callisaya M. Uncovering healthcare staff attitudes to the rapid deployment of telehealth in Victoria, 2020–2021: a 12‐month telehealth experience. Internal Medicine Journal 2023;53(6):1018 View
  5. Olesen M, Rossen S, Jørgensen R, Langballe Udbjørg L, Hansson H. Usefulness of a Digitally Assisted Person-Centered Care Intervention: Qualitative Study of Patients’ and Nurses’ Experiences in a Long-term Perspective. JMIR Nursing 2023;6:e46673 View
  6. Smits M, van Dalen D, Popping D, Bleeker R, Stommel M, van Goor H. Designing a video consultation area for hybrid care delivery: the Garden Room with a view. Frontiers in Digital Health 2023;5 View
  7. Rosenberg T, Kirkegaard J, Tveden M, Hyldig N, Dieperink K, Steffensen N, Ulriksen S, Lund T. Making decisions for follow-up chemotherapy based on digital patient reported outcomes data in patients with multiple myeloma and other M protein diseases – A mixed method study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 2024;68:102455 View
  8. de Souza J, Gillett K, Salifu Y, Walshe C. Changes in Participant Interactions. Using Focus Group Analysis Methodology to Explore the Impact on Participant Interactions of Face-to-Face Versus Online Video Data Collection Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2024;23 View
  9. Greene L, Rahja M, Laver K, Wong V, Leung C, Crotty M. Hospital Staff Perspectives on the Drivers and Challenges in Implementing a Virtual Rehabilitation Ward: Qualitative Study. JMIR Aging 2024;7:e54774 View
  10. Urlings C, Baselet B, Tabury K, Baatout S. Virtual medical astronaut avatars for future deep space missions. Frontiers in Space Technologies 2024;5 View
  11. Duffy C, Benotsch E. Nonverbal behavior in telehealth visits: A narrative review. Patient Education and Counseling 2025;132:108600 View
  12. Mikhael J, Darlington D, Howell B, Hydren J, Hernandez T, Werner S, Iraca T, Arnett M, Gonzalez V, Peschin S, Balch A, Moran D, Young-Daniels R, Banjo O, Obeng G, Asiedu-Ayeh B, Kawuo S, Tukur A, Mohammed I, Obeng A, Csanádi M, Lew T, Choon-Quinones M. The benefits of telehealth in promoting equity in blood cancer care – results of a multi-stakeholder forum and systematic literature review. Journal of Medical Economics 2025;28(1):788 View
  13. Alam M, Elin E. Qualitative exploration of chronic kidney disease patients’ attitudes, perceptions and satisfaction on medical care via video conferencing in Bangladesh. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing 2025;19(4):1377 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Maurer M, Kolkhir P, Ramanauskaite A, Cherrez-Ojeda I. Digital Allergology. View