Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions (3533) Digital Mental Health Interventions, e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology (2319) User-Centered Design Case Studies (759) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (1334) Problematic Internet Use, Online Gambling and Game Addiction (220) Mental Health Issues in Adolescence (691) Kids' and Adolescents' Use of Technology (160)

Published on in Vol 9 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/63258, first published .
Ambivalent User Needs as a Challenge and Chance for the Design of a Web-Based Intervention for Gaming Disorder: Qualitative Interview Study With Adolescents and Young Adults

Ambivalent User Needs as a Challenge and Chance for the Design of a Web-Based Intervention for Gaming Disorder: Qualitative Interview Study With Adolescents and Young Adults

Ambivalent User Needs as a Challenge and Chance for the Design of a Web-Based Intervention for Gaming Disorder: Qualitative Interview Study With Adolescents and Young Adults

Authors of this article:

Birte Linny Geisler1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Kay Uwe Petersen2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Sara Hanke2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Simon Schurer1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Anne Schreiber1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Christine Lämmle1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Anil Batra2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Tobias Renner1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Isabel Brandhorst1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Radunz M, Stevens M, Behm S, Hameed M, Bowden-Jones H, Delfabbro P, Demetrovics Z, Higuchi S, Potenza M, Wölfling K, Brandhorst I, Bore P, Claesdotter-Knutsson E, González-Bueso V, Herpertz S, Dieris-Hirche J, Hofstedt A, Gordh A, Jiménez-Murcia S, Nielsen P, Pallesen S, Paschke K, Ratta-apha W, Rigter H, Santamaria J, Sugara G, King D. Common practice elements of cognitive behavioral therapy for gaming disorder: A systematic review and expert panel evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review 2026;126:102740 View