This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions (2353) JMIR Theme Issue: COVID-19 Special Issue (2441) Equity and Digital Divide (210) User-centred Design Case Studies (587) Participatory Design and Participatory Research (320)

Published on in Vol 7 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/43101, first published .
Improving the Engagement of Underrepresented People in Health Research Through Equity-Centered Design Thinking: Qualitative Study and Process Evaluation for the Development of the Grounding Health Research in Design Toolkit

Improving the Engagement of Underrepresented People in Health Research Through Equity-Centered Design Thinking: Qualitative Study and Process Evaluation for the Development of the Grounding Health Research in Design Toolkit

Improving the Engagement of Underrepresented People in Health Research Through Equity-Centered Design Thinking: Qualitative Study and Process Evaluation for the Development of the Grounding Health Research in Design Toolkit

Authors of this article:

Alessandra N Bazzano1 Author Orcid Image ;   Lesley-Ann Noel2 Author Orcid Image ;   Tejal Patel1 Author Orcid Image ;   C Chantel Dominique3 Author Orcid Image ;   Catherine Haywood4 Author Orcid Image ;   Shenitta Moore5 Author Orcid Image ;   Andrea Mantsios6 Author Orcid Image ;   Patricia A Davis1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (8) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Sutherland S. Motherhood, COVID-19, and the postgraduate research experience: personal practice-based design insights. Design for Health 2023;7(3):418 View
  2. Göttgens I, Modderkolk L, Vermuë P, Darweesh S, Bloem B, Oertelt-Prigione S. Gender-aware Parkinson’s care: a design-based study of patient perspectives on gender norms and gender-sensitive care. eClinicalMedicine 2023;65:102285 View
  3. Weiss E, Porter K, Sullivan T, Sotelo Guerra L, Anderson E, Garrison N, Baker L, Smith J, Kraft S. Equity Concerns Across Pediatric Research Recruitment: An Analysis of Research Staff Interviews. Academic Pediatrics 2024;24(2):318 View
  4. Ambrose-Oji B, Urquhart J, Hemery G, Petrokofsky G, O’Brien L, Jones G, Karlsdóttir B. The opportunities and challenges to co-designing policy options for tree health with policy makers, researchers and land managers. Land Use Policy 2024;136:106974 View
  5. Saragosa M, Singh H, Steele Gray C, Tang T, Orchanian-Cheff A, Nelson M, Skouteris H. Exploring the Landscape of Eco-Mapping in Health Services Research: A Comprehensive Review. Health & Social Care in the Community 2024;2024:1 View
  6. Uribe J, Aponte R, Brown J, McCamey D. Nurses You Should Know: The power of online microlearning to decolonize nursing’s history. Nursing Outlook 2024;72(5):102227 View
  7. Zhang B. Research progress and intellectual structure of design for digital equity (DDE): A bibliometric analysis based on citespace. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2024;11(1) View
  8. Bucher A, Chaudhry B, Davis J, Lawrence K, Panza E, Baqer M, Feinstein R, Fields S, Huberty J, Kaplan D, Kusters I, Materia F, Park S, Kepper M, Kuo P. How to design equitable digital health tools: A narrative review of design tactics, case studies, and opportunities. PLOS Digital Health 2024;3(8):e0000591 View