JMIR Formative Research

View query in Help articles search

Field

e.g. mhealth

Operator

Field

Criteria

e.g. John Smith or 0000-0001-6479-5330

Exact Match for Criteria

Yes No

Search Results (1 to 10 of 1934 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS

Sort by:

Impact of mHealth on Postoperative Quality of Life, Self-Management, and Dysfunction in Patients With Oral and Maxillofacial Tumors: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Yufei Li, Yueping Wang, Yifan Wu, Hong Yu, Hua Yao, Yuqun Wang, Yulan Yin, Lan Wang, Lili Hou

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e59926

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Feasibility of Collecting and Linking Digital Phenotyping, Clinical, and Genetics Data for Mental Health Research: Pilot Observational Study

Joanne R Beames, Omar Dabash, Michael J Spoelma, Artur Shvetcov, Wu Yi Zheng, Aimy Slade, Jin Han, Leonard Hoon, Joost Funke Kupper, Richard Parker, Brittany Mitchell, Nicholas G Martin, Jill M Newby, Alexis E Whitton, Helen Christensen

JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e71377

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Evaluating and Improving Syndrome Differentiation Thinking Ability in Large Language Models: Method Development Study

Chunliang Chen, Xinyu Wang, Ming Guan, Wenjing Yue, Yuanbin Wu, Ya Zhou, Xiaoling Wang

JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e75103

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Rectifying Genocidal Data Stewardship: A Commentary on Ethical and Legal Obligations for Sharing Data With Tribal Entities

Oliver Bear Don't Walk IV, Lauren W Yowelunh McLester-Davis, Susan Brown Trinidad

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e77946

Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Download PDF Download XML

Treatment of Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea With Collateral Puncture Therapy: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

With reference to relevant literature, we used a noninferiority trial calculation formula for sample size calculation, as follows: n1=[(u1-T+u1-u)e/W]2×(1+c)/c, n2=cn1 [28] In the formula, where c=1, n2=n1; setting α=.05, then u1–T=1.64, u1–u=1.28. Based on previous studies using clinician erythema assessment scoring as the primary efficacy end point, e is taken as 0.84, W as 1. Substituting the data into the formula, we calculate n1=n2≈13 [29].

Aolin Song, Bingnan Cui, Xuemin Wang, Jianing Bi, Xiaohong Wu, Liu Yang, Li Liu, Shengyuan Qu, Zhu Fan, Jiao Yang, Yuhe Yan