Search Results (1 to 10 of 2327 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 680 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 409 JMIR Research Protocols
- 275 JMIR Formative Research
- 194 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 101 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 82 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 76 JMIR Mental Health
- 67 JMIR Human Factors
- 66 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 44 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 38 JMIR Aging
- 37 JMIR Cancer
- 35 JMIR Serious Games
- 27 JMIR Diabetes
- 26 JMIR Medical Education
- 25 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 24 JMIR Dermatology
- 22 Iproceedings
- 17 JMIR Cardio
- 16 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 13 JMIR Infodemiology
- 12 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 9 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 8 JMIRx Med
- 5 JMIR AI
- 5 JMIR Nursing
- 4 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 4 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 2 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
Each focus group was facilitated by 2 experienced moderators (ie, “facilitators”) with training in qualitative research methods (SEF-P, BNE, TL, and MAK). To ensure balanced participation and that all voices were heard, the facilitators used strategies such as directly inviting quieter participants to share their thoughts, using prompts to encourage diverse perspectives, and managing dominant voices to maintain an inclusive environment [63,64].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e65188
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The PMIS (Pearson r=−0.76; P
As we examined the sensitivity and specificity data to choose cut scores, we chose to favor sensitivity to minimize missing individuals with true disease in this sample of patients considered high risk because of their cognitive concerns. The cut scores for a positive result on the 5-Cog components were as follows: PMIS ≤6 (range 0-8), Symbol Match ≤25 (range 0-65), and s MCR >5 (range 0-7).
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e60471
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The application of this mapping to the data was performed using R version 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). The full list of diagnosis names corresponding to ADRD diagnosis categories is provided in Multimedia Appendix 1.
To assess associations between clusters and sex, as well as ADRD diagnoses, we used the chi-square test.
JMIR Aging 2025;8:e65178
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section