Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Research Letter (50) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (348) Patient Education for Cancer (255) Cancer Self-Management (100) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (842)

Published on in Vol 10 (2026)

This is a member publication of King's College London (Jisc)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/90139, first published .
Retrieval-Augmented Generation Versus GPT-4o for Patient-Facing Gynecological Cancer Information: Quality Evaluation

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Versus GPT-4o for Patient-Facing Gynecological Cancer Information: Quality Evaluation

Retrieval-Augmented Generation Versus GPT-4o for Patient-Facing Gynecological Cancer Information: Quality Evaluation

Authors of this article:

Stephen Pearson1 Author Orcid Image ;   Mimi Reyburn2 Author Orcid Image ;   Conor Foley3 Author Orcid Image ;   Alison Finch2 Author Orcid Image ;   Suzanne Bench4 Author Orcid Image ;   Timothy Bonnici1 Author Orcid Image ;   Louise Rose5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

There are no citations yet available for this article according to Crossref .