This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Discretionary Corrigenda* (18)

Published on in Vol 8 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/58733, first published .
Correction: The Influence of Human Connections and Collaboration on Research Grant Success at Various Career Stages: Regression Analysis

Correction: The Influence of Human Connections and Collaboration on Research Grant Success at Various Career Stages: Regression Analysis

Correction: The Influence of Human Connections and Collaboration on Research Grant Success at Various Career Stages: Regression Analysis

Authors of this article:

Akiko Hashiguchi1 Author Orcid Image ;   Makoto Asashima2 Author Orcid Image ;   Satoru Takahashi1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations (2) Metrics

    Corrigenda and Addenda

    1Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

    2Advanced Comprehesive Research Organization (ACRO), Teikyo University, Itabashi, Japan

    Corresponding Author:

    Akiko Hashiguchi, PhD

    Institute of Medicine

    University of Tsukuba

    1-1-1 Tennodai

    Tsukuba, 305-8575

    Japan

    Phone: 81 298537276

    Email: hashiguchi.akiko.ge@u.tsukuba.ac.jp



    In “The Influence of Human Connections and Collaboration on Research Grant Success at Various Career Stages: Regression Analysis” (JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e49905) the authors noted one error.

    In the “Results” section of the Abstract, the following sentence:

    Tracking the process of research development, we found that collaboration during the periods of 10 to 14 years and 15 to 19 years after completing a doctorate degree determined the size of the project that the participant would obtain—interactions with peer researchers and subordinates during the 10- to 14-year postdegree period had positive effects on ≥2 large-program acquisitions (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.09-2.09 and OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.57, respectively), whereas interactions with subordinates during the 15- to 19-year postdegree period also had positive effects (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.25-1.07).

    Has been changed to read as follows:

    Tracking the process of research development, we found that collaboration during the periods of 10 to 14 years and 15 to 19 years after completing a doctorate degree determined the size of the project that the participant would obtain—interactions with peer researchers and subordinates during the 10- to 14-year postdegree period had positive effects on ≥2 large-program acquisitions (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.09-2.09 and OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.57, respectively), whereas interactions with subordinates during the 15- to 19-year postdegree period also had positive effects (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06-1.47).

    The correction will appear in the online version of the paper on the JMIR Publications website on April 5, 2024, together with the publication of this correction notice. Because this was made after submission to PubMed, PubMed Central, and other full-text repositories, the corrected article has also been resubmitted to those repositories.

    This is a non–peer-reviewed article. submitted 22.03.24; accepted 27.03.24; published 05.04.24.

    Copyright

    ©Akiko Hashiguchi, Makoto Asashima, Satoru Takahashi. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 05.04.2024.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.