Published on in Vol 8 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/54207, first published .
Leveraging Ecological Momentary Assessment Data to Characterize Individual Mobility: Exploratory Pilot Study in Rural Uganda

Leveraging Ecological Momentary Assessment Data to Characterize Individual Mobility: Exploratory Pilot Study in Rural Uganda

Leveraging Ecological Momentary Assessment Data to Characterize Individual Mobility: Exploratory Pilot Study in Rural Uganda

Original Paper

1Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States

2ICAP at Columbia University, New York, NY, United States

3Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States

4Rakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda

5Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States

6Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States

7Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States

8Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States

9Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States

10Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States

11Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States

12Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States

*these authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author:

Aleya Khalifa, MPH, MPhil

Department of Epidemiology

Mailman School of Public Health

Columbia University

722 W 168th St

New York, NY, 10032

United States

Phone: 1 212 305 2862

Email: ak4598@cumc.columbia.edu


Background: The geographical environments within which individuals conduct their daily activities may influence health behaviors, yet little is known about individual-level geographic mobility and specific, linked behaviors in rural low- and middle-income settings.

Objective: Nested in a 3-month ecological momentary assessment intervention pilot trial, this study aims to leverage mobile health app user GPS data to examine activity space through individual spatial mobility and locations of reported health behaviors in relation to their homes.

Methods: Pilot trial participants were recruited from the Rakai Community Cohort Study—an ongoing population-based cohort study in rural south-central Uganda. Participants used a smartphone app that logged their GPS coordinates every 1-2 hours for approximately 90 days. They also reported specific health behaviors (alcohol use, cigarette smoking, and having condomless sex with a non–long-term partner) via the app that were both location and time stamped. In this substudy, we characterized participant mobility using 3 measures: average distance (kilometers) traveled per week, number of unique locations visited (deduplicated points within 25 m of one another), and the percentage of GPS points recorded away from home. The latter measure was calculated using home buffer regions of 100 m, 400 m, and 800 m. We also evaluated the number of unique locations visited for each specific health behavior, and whether those locations were within or outside the home buffer regions. Sociodemographic information, mobility measures, and locations of health behaviors were summarized across the sample using descriptive statistics.

Results: Of the 46 participants with complete GPS data, 24 (52%) participants were men, 30 (65%) participants were younger than 35 years, and 33 (72%) participants were in the top 2 socioeconomic status quartiles. On median, participants traveled 303 (IQR 152-585) km per week. Over the study period, participants on median recorded 1292 (IQR 963-2137) GPS points—76% (IQR 58%-86%) of which were outside their 400-m home buffer regions. Of the participants reporting drinking alcohol, cigarette smoking, and engaging in condomless sex, respectively, 19 (83%), 8 (89%), and 12 (86%) reported that behavior at least once outside their 400-m home neighborhood and across a median of 3.0 (IQR 1.5-5.5), 3.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0), and 3.5 (IQR 1.0-7.0) unique locations, respectively.

Conclusions: Among residents in rural Uganda, an ecological momentary assessment app successfully captured high mobility and health-related behaviors across multiple locations. Our findings suggest that future mobile health interventions in similar settings can benefit from integrating spatial data collection using the GPS technology in mobile phones. Leveraging such individual-level GPS data can inform place-based strategies within these interventions for promoting healthy behavior change.

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e54207

doi:10.2196/54207

Keywords



The emerging field of human mobility highlights 2 key considerations for health research: individuals’ “neighborhoods” extend beyond where they live to other parts of their activity space and spatial determinants of health may vary in both their prevalence and their effect across these activity spaces [1]. Despite growing knowledge in high-income countries [2,3], there remains a dearth of data in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) relating individual-level mobility to individual-level health behaviors.

Understanding people’s activity spaces (the places visited and the activities that take place there) can inform health promotion design and implementation. For example, one of the few GPS-based human mobility studies in the region used individual-level data to inform malaria programs in Zimbabwe as to whether bed nets should be delivered to households or high-mobility areas during the rainy season [4]. The mostly rural district of Rakai, Uganda, is characterized by substantial mobility for fishing and trading, among other family and school-related reasons [5-7], demonstrating significant time spent away from home. While evidence suggests that fisherfolk may be more likely to drink alcohol if they reside nearer to community drinking venues [8], without information on activity spaces beyond households, it is unclear whether similar behavior patterns exist in spaces away from home such as where people socialize or conduct commerce. GPS data collected from consenting individuals using mobile health (mHealth) apps, like ecological momentary assessments (EMA), offer an opportunity to analyze individual activity spaces vis-à-vis health behaviors like drinking alcohol.

This study analyzed individual mobility and spatial locations of health behaviors—all reported on an EMA app—to explore relationships between health and place and demonstrate the potential utility of such data for informing future place-based interventions.


Overview

A pilot trial using EMA messaging to influence certain health-related behaviors was conducted in Rakai, Uganda in 2017 [9]. In addition to supporting healthful behaviors (eg, fruit and vegetable consumption), an EMA app sent real-time messages to support users in reducing smoking, drinking alcoholic beverages, and having condomless sex with a non-long-term partner. Participants aged 18-49 years with a telephone number and who completed at least secondary education were purposively recruited from the Rakai Community Cohort Study (RCCS), an ongoing population-based cohort, between February 2016 and March 2017 [5]. Participants were given a password-protected smartphone with the trial’s app (emocha Health Inc) installed, along with a charger, power bank, and funds to purchase 525 megabytes of data monthly [9]. As part of the informed consent process, participants were told that the smartphone would track their location over the study period and that the same phone would be used to log their health behaviors—all of which would be kept confidential in locked files or secure computers by authorized project personnel.

This substudy used 2 data types: GPS locations and user-initiated reports. The smartphone app logged GPS coordinates every 1-2 hours if the phone was turned on and connected to the internet, otherwise, data were logged once the phone was connected. Using the app, participants were instructed to submit self-initiated behavioral reports within 1 hour of engaging in any of the behaviors. Each participant’s user-initiated reports were linked to logged GPS coordinates by nearest timestamp. Sociodemographic information from the most recently available RCCS survey (2015-2018) was used to describe the study population [10]. Participants’ home GPS coordinates were logged during RCCS household enumeration.

For each participant, the great circle distance was measured in kilometers between each recorded GPS point and the previously occurring point [11]. GPS points were excluded if they were outside of sub-Saharan Africa (<1% of GPS coordinates per participant). Interpoint distances were totaled over each participant’s roughly 90-day observation period [12]. Mobility was summarized as the average distance traveled per week to account for certain days of the week with outliers of distance traveled (eg, staying home on Sundays) that can bias centrality estimates [13]. Two other measures were also described: the number of unique places visited (deduplicated points within 25 m of one another, based on smartphones’ 5-20-m GPS point accuracy [12]), and the percent of GPS points recorded away from home [7]. To calculate the latter measure, GPS points were dichotomized as being located within or outside a home buffer region. A 100-m Euclidian distance circular buffer around participants’ home GPS coordinates reflected the home location, accounting for physical landscape and GPS accuracy [14]. We also calculated 400-m and 800-m buffers reflecting home neighborhoods that might include neighbors’ residences, shops, and transit stops [15].

We further evaluated the number of unique locations where behaviors occurred and the number of behavior locations away from the home or home neighborhood among participants reporting a particular behavior, using the same methods as above [16].

Ethical Considerations

The Ugandan Virus Research Institute Research and Ethics Committee and the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine institutional review board approved the pilot trial, registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04375423). Written informed consent was obtained from interested participants at the first study visit. Any identifying information (eg, contact information) was stored in locked files or on secured computers. Once study data were collected, each participant was assigned a unique identifier and all data for analyses were deidentified. Participants were compensated for their time with 10,000 UGX (approximately US $3 at the time) and refunded for their travel to each study visit [9].


A total of 46 EMA trial participants had both RCCS and GPS data, and 34 of 80,131 total GPS points from across 9 participants were excluded because they were outside of sub-Saharan Africa, potentially indicating international travel or device malfunction. Participants contributed GPS points across a median of 65 (IQR 45-78) observation days, at a median of 23 (IQR 18-31) points per day. Participants were mostly of higher socioeconomic status and lived in an agrarian or trading community (Table 1).

Participants’ activity spaces varied. Common paths included travel to or from Kampala (Uganda’s capital city) and Masaka City (the largest city in south-central Uganda), local travel around Rakai district, and travel along Lake Victoria coastlines and islands (Figure 1 [17]). The median weekly distance traveled was 303 (IQR 152-585 km; Table 2). While participants contributed on median of 1292 (963-2137) GPS points, they reported a median of 389 (IQR 218-706) unique locations over their 90-day observation period. A median of 92% (IQR 75%-97%), 76% (IQR 58%-86%), and 67% (IQR 51%-82%) of participants’ GPS points were outside of their 100-m, 400-m, and 800-m home buffer regions, respectively.

Of the participants reporting alcohol use, cigarette smoking, and condomless sex with a non–long-term partner, each behavior was reported a range of 1-72, 1-37, and 1-18 times, respectively (Table 2), and 17 (74%), 5 (55%), and 8 (57%) participants reported those behaviors at 2 or more unique locations (Table 3). Of the participants reporting, alcohol use, smoking, and condomless sex were reported 0-70, 1-36, and 1-11 times away from the home location (ie, outside the 100-m buffer), respectively. Participants reported all behaviors slightly less frequently outside the home neighborhood (ie, outside the 400-m and 800-m buffers).

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics from the Rakai Community Cohort Study, 2015-2018, among pilot trial participants in Rakai, Uganda (N=46).
CharacteristicParticipants, n (%)
Gender

Men24 (52)

Women22 (48)
Age group (years)

20-2414 (30)

25-3416 (35)

35-4516 (35)
Socioeconomic status quartile

Lowest7 (15)

Low-middle6 (13)

High-middle18 (39)

Highest15 (33)
Highest level of education

Secondary34 (74)

Tertiary12 (26)
Reported migration since the last survey round

No migration37 (80)

In-migrated2 (4.3)

Out-migrated7 (15)
Type of community

Agrarian21 (46)

Fishing5 (11)

Trading20 (43)
Primary occupation

Agriculture15 (36)

Retail/trading/vending7 (17)

Construction/transportation2 (4.8)

Government/clerical/teaching12 (29)

Student1 (2.4)

Other5 (12)

Unknown4
Vehicle access

Access to car or motorcycle18 (39)

Access to a bicycle20 (43)
Figure 1. Activity paths among pilot trial participants in Rakai, Uganda, 2016-2017, (N=46). Each color represents a unique participant’s activity path. The figure was created using OpenStreetMap and CARTO. OpenStreetMap is licensed under the Open Data Commons Open Database License [17].
Table 2. Measures of mobility and health behavior locations among pilot trial participants in Rakai, Uganda, 2016-2017 (N=46).
MeasuresMedian (IQR)Range
Distance traveled (km) per week303 (152-585)15-6962
GPS points (n)1292 (963-2137)68-7157
Unique locations visited (n)389 (218-706)62-1752
GPS points outside 100-m home buffer region (%)92 (75-97)<1-100
GPS points outside 400-m home buffer region (%)76 (58-86)<1-100
GPS points outside 800-m home buffer region (%)67 (51-82)<1-100
Alcohol use (n=23, 50% of individuals reported)

Reports, n4.0 (2.5-8.5)1-72

Unique locations where behavior occurred (n)3.0 (1.5-5.5)1-23

Reports away from home (outside 100-m buffer region; n)3.0 (1.5-5.0)0-70

Reports away from home (outside 400-m buffer region; n)2.0 (1.0-4.0)0-43

Reports away from home (outside 800-m buffer region; n)2.0 (0.0-3.0)0-27
Cigarette smoking (n=9, 20% of individuals reported)

Reports, n4.0 (1.0-6.0)1-37

Unique locations where behavior occurred (n)3.0 (1.0-3.0)1-20

Reports away from home (outside 100-m buffer region; n)2.0 (1.0-5.0)1-36

Reports away from home (outside 400-m buffer region; n)2.0 (1.0-3.0)0-22

Reports away from home (outside 800-m buffer region; n)1.0 (1.0-3.0)0-5
Condomless sex with a non–long-term partner (n=14, 30% of individuals reported)

Reports, n6.0 (1.0-9.5)1-18

Unique locations where behavior occurred (n)3.5 (1.0-7.0)1-16

Reports away from home (outside 100-m buffer region; n)3.0 (1.0-9.0)1-11

Reports away from home (outside 400-m buffer region; n)2.5 (1.0-6.75)0-10

Reports away from home (outside 800-m buffer region; n)2.5 (0.25-6.0)0-10
Table 3. Summary statistics of health behavior locations among pilot trial participants in Rakai, Uganda, 2016-2017 (N=46).
Summary statisticsParticipants, n (%)
Alcohol use (n=23, 50% of individuals reported)

One unique location6 (26)

Two or more unique locations17 (74)

Any report away from home (outside 100-m buffer region)22 (96)

Any report away from home (outside 400-m buffer region)19 (83)

Any report away from home (outside 800-m buffer region)16 (70)
Cigarette smoking (n=9, 20% of individuals reported)

One unique location4 (44)

Two or more unique locations5 (55)

Any report away from home (outside 100-m buffer region)9 (100)

Any report away from home (outside 400-m buffer region)8 (89)

Any report away from home (outside 800-m buffer region)8 (89)
Condomless sex with a non–long-term partner (n=14, 30% of individuals reported)

One unique location6 (43)

Two or more unique locations8 (57)

Any report away from home (outside 100-m buffer region)14 (100)

Any report away from home (outside 400-m buffer region)12 (86)

Any report away from home (outside 800-m buffer region)10 (71)

Principal Findings

EMA trial participants were highly mobile, with over 75% of participants traveling at least 150 km/week. Most participants reporting cigarette smoking, alcohol use, and condomless sex with a non–long-term partner recorded those behaviors in 2 or more unique locations. mHealth studies using mobile phone apps could leverage GPS-based mobility data from consenting participants to inform future interventions.

The high mobility observed in this sample reflects the regional context, known for transient fisherfolk communities, localized market trading, and transport corridors connecting Kampala to the Tanzanian border [5]. As expected, participants traveled between Rakai town and Masaka city (approximately 65 km), Kampala (approximately 197 km), and fish landing sites around Misozi (approximately 60 km). In comparison, residents of a rural agricultural district of Zimbabwe traveled a fraction of the distance per week [4]. Place-based interventions should consider the local socioeconomic context when deciding where and how to deliver services, as it seems to impact the scale and geographic patterning of individual mobility [18].

Since most participants reported health behaviors in 2 or more unique locations, EMA interventions could consider using strategies, like geofencing, to deliver behavior change messages when users enter geographies in which they have historically been more likely to report certain behaviors [19,20]. For example, individuals may prefer to drink alcohol in locations where consumption is acceptable, affordable, and available [8]. Geofencing is understudied in LMICs but has been used in South Africa, where CareConekta (a GPS-based mHealth app) links people living with HIV to health facilities while traveling outside their regular clinic catchment area [21].

Increased availability of and access to mHealth technologies with GPS capabilities, including increasing mobile connectivity in LMICs, can make spatial analyses possible [22]. Our study demonstrates successful data collection using study-supplied mobile phones with an EMA app [23]. This means spatial data collection and analysis can be more easily integrated into mHealth studies than others that provide a separate wearable GPS device for short periods [24].

Limitations

This study has limitations. First, the sample may not accurately represent the underlying population as only individuals with secondary education or higher were eligible to ensure they could be trained on how to use the smartphone app. For example, these findings may overrepresent the mobilities and health behaviors of people in higher socioeconomic levels. Second, under half of the participants reported each behavior, and often only once, limiting the analysis. Third, great circle distance measures may underestimate travel distances [25], though short distances between GPS points (median 0.8 km) likely minimized this bias. Finally, Euclidian buffer regions may not accurately reflect neighborhoods. Road networks and geographic features, or participant interviews, could also be used to define areas that more accurately reflect what individuals perceive as their “neighborhood” [1].

Conclusions

As a growing number of mHealth interventions in LMICs attempt to apply place-based strategies to improve health outcomes [26-30], more work is needed to understand the mobility of potential users. Among residents in rural Uganda, as part of a pilot trial, an EMA app successfully captured high mobility and health-related behaviors in multiple locations. Future mHealth interventions in similar settings could leverage individual-level GPS data to inform place-based strategies for promoting healthy behavior change.

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI114398, R01AI14333) and the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health. The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the funding agencies. The authors did not use generative artificial intelligence to write any portion of this manuscript.

Data Availability

The data sets analyzed during this study are not publicly available due to the sensitive nature of individual-level GPS data and data sharing policies of the Rakai Health Sciences Program (RHSP) but are available from RHSP on reasonable request (datarequests@rhsp.org).

Conflicts of Interest

emocha Mobile Health Inc developed the application used in this study. LWC is entitled to royalties on certain non-research revenue generated by this company and owns company equity. Specific to this study, LWC received no royalties or compensation from emocha Mobile Health Inc. This arrangement has been reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  1. Duncan DT, Kawachi I. Neighborhoods and Health, Second Edition. Oxford, UK. Oxford University Press; 2018.
  2. Smith L, Foley L, Panter J. Activity spaces in studies of the environment and physical activity: a review and synthesis of implications for causality. Health Place. 2019;58:102113. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Duncan D, Kawachi I. Neighborhoods and health: a progress report. In: Neighborhoods and Health, Second Edition. Oxford, UK. Oxford University Press; 2018:1-16.
  4. Hast M, Mharakurwa S, Shields TM, Lubinda J, Searle K, Gwanzura L, et al. Characterizing human movement patterns using GPS data loggers in an area of persistent malaria in Zimbabwe along the Mozambique border. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):942. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Chang LW, Grabowski MK, Ssekubugu R, Nalugoda F, Kigozi G, Nantume B, et al. Heterogeneity of the HIV epidemic in agrarian, trading, and fishing communities in Rakai, Uganda: an observational epidemiological study. Lancet HIV. 2016;3(8):e388-e396. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Kate Grabowski M, Lessler J, Bazaale J, Nabukalu D, Nankinga J, Nantume B, et al. Migration, hotspots, and dispersal of HIV infection in Rakai, Uganda. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):976. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Schuyler AC, Edelstein ZR, Mathur S, Sekasanvu J, Nalugoda F, Gray R, et al. Mobility among youth in Rakai, Uganda: trends, characteristics, and associations with behavioural risk factors for HIV. Glob Public Health. 2017;12(8):1033-1050. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Kuteesa MO, Webb EL, Kawuma R, Naluwugge J, Thadeus K, Ndekezi D, et al. 'We shall drink until Lake Victoria dries up': drivers of heavy drinking and illicit drug use among young Ugandans in fishing communities. Glob Public Health. 2022;17(4):538-554. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Beres LK, Mbabali I, Anok A, Katabalwa C, Mulamba J, Thomas AG, et al. Mobile ecological momentary assessment and intervention and health behavior change among adults in Rakai, Uganda: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5(7):e22693. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Santelli JS, Chen I, Makumbi F, Wei Y, Nalugoda F, Lutalo T, et al. Household wealth and HIV incidence over time, rural Uganda, 1994-2018. AIDS. 2021;35(11):1835-1843. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Banerjee S. On geodetic distance computations in spatial modeling. Biometrics. 2005;61(2):617-625. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Müller SR, Bayer JB, Ross MQ, Mount J, Stachl C, Harari GM, et al. Analyzing GPS data for psychological research: a tutorial. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2022;5(2):1-11. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
  13. Crane BM, Moored KD, Rosso AL, Carlson MC. Using GPS technologies to examine community mobility in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023;78(5):811-820. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Searle KM, Lubinda J, Hamapumbu H, Shields TM, Curriero FC, Smith DL, et al. Characterizing and quantifying human movement patterns using GPS data loggers in an area approaching malaria elimination in rural southern Zambia. R Soc Open Sci. 2017;4(5):170046. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. Duncan DT, Regan SD, Park SH, Goedel WC, Kim B, Barton SC, et al. Assessment of spatial mobility among young men who have sex with men within and across high HIV prevalence neighborhoods in New York City: the P18 neighborhood study. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2020;35:100356. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Mitchell JT, Schick RS, Hallyburton M, Dennis MF, Kollins SH, Beckham JC, et al. Combined ecological momentary assessment and global positioning system tracking to assess smoking behavior: a proof of concept study. J Dual Diagn. 2014;10(1):19-29. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Open Database License. URL: https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright [accessed 2024-05-23]
  18. Camlin CS, Kwena ZA, Dworkin SL, Cohen CR, Bukusi EA. "She mixes her business": HIV transmission and acquisition risks among female migrants in western Kenya. Soc Sci Med. 2014;102:146-156. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. McGuirt JT, Gustafson A, Ammerman AS, Tucker-McLaughlin M, Enahora B, Moore C, et al. EatWellNow: formative development of a place-based behavioral "nudge" technology intervention to promote healthier food purchases among army soldiers. Nutrients. 2022;14(7):1458. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Tobin K, Heidari O, Volpi C, Sodder S, Duncan D. Use of geofencing interventions in population health research: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2023;13(8):e069374. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Clouse K, Noholoza S, Madwayi S, Mrubata M, Camlin CS, Myer L, et al. The implementation of a GPS-based location-tracking smartphone app in South Africa to improve engagement in HIV care: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023;11:e44945. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  22. GSMA mobile connectivity index: Uganda index score. Global System for Mobile Communications. 2022. URL: https://www.mobileconnectivityindex.com/#year=2019&zoneIsocode=UGA&analysisView=UGA [accessed 2023-10-23]
  23. Beres LK, Mbabali I, Anok A, Katabalwa C, Mulamba J, Thomas AG, et al. Acceptability and feasibility of mobile phone-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention in Uganda: a pilot randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2022;17(8):e0273228. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Duncan DT, Hickson DA, Goedel WC, Callander D, Brooks B, Chen YT, et al. The social context of HIV prevention and care among Black men who have sex with men in three U.S. cities: the Neighborhoods and Networks (N2) cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(11):1922. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Shahid R, Bertazzon S, Knudtson ML, Ghali WA. Comparison of distance measures in spatial analytical modeling for health service planning. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:200. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Bahemuka UM, Okimat P, Webb EL, Seeley J, Ssetaala A, Okech B, et al. Factors associated with short and long term mobility and HIV risk of women living in fishing communities around Lake Victoria in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda: a cross sectional survey. AIDS Behav. 2023;27(3):880-890. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  27. Bernardo EL, Nhampossa T, Clouse K, Carlucci JG, Fernández-Luis S, Fuente-Soro L, et al. Patterns of mobility and its impact on retention in care among people living with HIV in the Manhiça District, Mozambique. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0250844. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Brown TS, Robinson DA, Buckee CO, Mathema B. Connecting the dots: understanding how human mobility shapes TB epidemics. Trends Microbiol. 2022;30(11):1036-1044. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  29. Felker-Kantor E, Polanco C, Perez M, Donastorg Y, Andrinopoulos K, Kendall C, et al. Daily activity spaces and drug use among female sex workers living with HIV in the Dominican Republic. Health Place. 2021;68:102527. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Khan UR, Razzak J, Wärnberg MG. Association of adolescents' independent mobility with road traffic injuries in Karachi, Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(3):e057206. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]


EMA: ecological momentary assessment
LMIC: low- and middle-income country
mHealth: mobile health
RCCS: Rakai Community Cohort Study


Edited by A Mavragani; submitted 01.11.23; peer-reviewed by K Clouse; comments to author 23.03.24; revised version received 28.03.24; accepted 12.04.24; published 10.06.24.

Copyright

©Aleya Khalifa, Laura K Beres, Aggrey Anok, Ismail Mbabali, Charles Katabalwa, Jeremiah Mulamba, Alvin G Thomas, Eva Bugos, Gertrude Nakigozi, Larry W Chang, M Kate Grabowski. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 10.06.2024.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.