This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Pilot studies (ehealth) (215) Generative Language Models Including ChatGPT (325) Artificial Intelligence (1421) Chatbots and Conversational Agents (543)

Published on in Vol 8 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/52164, first published .
Human-Written vs AI-Generated Texts in Orthopedic Academic Literature: Comparative Qualitative Analysis

Human-Written vs AI-Generated Texts in Orthopedic Academic Literature: Comparative Qualitative Analysis

Human-Written vs AI-Generated Texts in Orthopedic Academic Literature: Comparative Qualitative Analysis

Authors of this article:

Hassan Tarek Hakam1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Robert Prill2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Lisa Korte4 Author Orcid Image ;   Bruno Lovreković5 Author Orcid Image ;   Marko Ostojić6 Author Orcid Image ;   Nikolai Ramadanov1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Felix Muehlensiepen3, 4 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations (3) Metrics

Journals

  1. Zhang C, Liu S, Zhou X, Zhou S, Tian Y, Wang S, Xu N, Li W. Examining the Role of Large Language Models in Orthopedics: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e59607 View
  2. Diel A, Lalgi T, Schröter I, MacDorman K, Teufel M, Bäuerle A. Human performance in detecting deepfakes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 56 papers. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 2024;16:100538 View
  3. Galli C, Moretti C, Calciolari E. Intelligent summaries: Will Artificial Intelligence mark the finale for biomedical literature reviews?. Learned Publishing 2025;38(1) View