This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Early Results in Infodemiology and Infoveillance (89) Infoveillance, Infodemiology, Digital Disease Surveillance, Infodemic Management (1087) Smoking Cessation (593) Medicine 2.0: Social Media, Open, Participatory, Collaborative Medicine (1789) Infodemiology and Infoveillance (1456)

Published on in Vol 7 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/42706, first published .
Public Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration’s Proposed Rules Prohibiting Menthol Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study

Public Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration’s Proposed Rules Prohibiting Menthol Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study

Public Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration’s Proposed Rules Prohibiting Menthol Cigarettes on Twitter: Observational Study

Authors of this article:

Runtao Zhou1 Author Orcid Image ;   Qihang Tang1 Author Orcid Image ;   Zidian Xie2 Author Orcid Image ;   Dongmei Li2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (4) Metrics

Journals

  1. Zhou R, Xie Z, Tang Q, Li D. Social Network Analysis of e-Cigarette–Related Social Media Influencers on Twitter/X: Observational Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e53666 View
  2. Liu P, Lou X, Xie Z, Shang C, Li D. Public Perceptions and Discussions of the US Food and Drug Administration's JUUL Ban Policy on Twitter: Observational Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e51327 View
  3. Bold K, Kong G, O'Malley S. The Scientific Basis for the Regulation of Flavors in Tobacco Products. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 2024;20(1):381 View
  4. Zou J, Feliciano J, Xie Z, Li D. Public Perceptions of the Food and Drug Administration's Regulatory Authority Over Synthetic Nicotine on Twitter: Observational Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e56371 View
  5. Silver N, Kierstead E, Emery S, Binns S, Guy M, Schillo B. Reframing social media discourse following the FDA’s menthol ban announcement as industry agenda setting rather than public sentiment. Tobacco Control 2024:tc-2024-058719 View
  6. Lin S, Tulabandu S, Koch J, Hayes R, Barnes A, Purohit H, Chen S, Han B, Xue H. Public Response to Federal Electronic Cigarette Regulations Analyzed Using Social Media Data Through Natural Language Processing: Topic Modeling Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e58919 View
  7. Dobbs P, Kong G, Lovett K, Henriksen L. Tobacco control policies discussed on social media: a scoping review. Tobacco Control 2024:tc-2024-058824 View
  8. Xie Z, Liu X, Lou X, Li D. Public Perceptions of Very Low Nicotine Content on Twitter: Observational Study. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e63035 View
  9. Silver N, Feng M, Kierstead E, Tran H, Binns S, Emery S, Schillo B. Twitter (X) and the Commercial Determinants of Health: Characterizing the Most Amplified, Influential, and Connected Voices Driving Twitter Discourse About Tobacco Regulatory Policy From September 2019 to July 2021. Social Media + Society 2025;11(1) View
  10. Ye P, Wu M, Han Y, Shimazaki Y, Cornacchione Ross J, Sutfin E, Li D, Xie Z. Temporal and Thematic Analysis of Promotional Waterpipe-Related Posts on Twitter/X in the US. Substance Use & Misuse 2025:1 View