This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions (2410) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (851) Wearable Devices and Sensors (888) Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth (974) Mobile Health (mhealth) (2939) Mobile Apps for Pregnancy and Parenting Education (43) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (1671) Pregnancy Information, Education and Lifestyle Interventions (300)
Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/28628, first published .
Users’ Perceptions Toward mHealth Technologies for Health and Well-being Monitoring in Pregnancy Care: Qualitative Interview Study

Users’ Perceptions Toward mHealth Technologies for Health and Well-being Monitoring in Pregnancy Care: Qualitative Interview Study

Users’ Perceptions Toward mHealth Technologies for Health and Well-being Monitoring in Pregnancy Care: Qualitative Interview Study

Authors of this article:

Jane Li1 Author Orcid Image ;   David Silvera-Tawil1 Author Orcid Image ;   Marlien Varnfield2 Author Orcid Image ;   M Sazzad Hussain1 Author Orcid Image ;   Vanitha Math3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (10) Metrics

Journals

  1. Robinson T, Condell J, Ramsey E, Leavey G. Self-Management of Subclinical Common Mental Health Disorders (Anxiety, Depression and Sleep Disorders) Using Wearable Devices. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023;20(3):2636 View
  2. Alsahli S, Hor S, Lam M. Factors Influencing the Acceptance and Adoption of Mobile Health Apps by Physicians During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2023;11:e50419 View
  3. Schaaf J, Weber T, von Wagner M, Stephan C, Carney J, Köhler S, Voigt A, Noll R, Storf H, Müller A. Interviews with HIV Experts for Development of a Mobile Health Application in HIV Care—A Qualitative Study. Healthcare 2023;11(15):2180 View
  4. Maugeri A, Barchitta M, Agodi A. How Wearable Sensors Can Support the Research on Foetal and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Scoping Review. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2023;13(2):218 View
  5. Nissen M, Perez C, Jaeger K, Bleher H, Flaucher M, Huebner H, Danzberger N, Titzmann A, Pontones C, Fasching P, Beckmann M, Eskofier B, Leutheuser H. Usability and Perception of a Wearable-Integrated Digital Maternity Record App in Germany: User Study. JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting 2023;6:e50765 View
  6. Alhammad N, Alajlani M, Abd-alrazaq A, Epiphaniou G, Arvanitis T. Patients’ Perspectives on the Data Confidentiality, Privacy, and Security of mHealth Apps: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2024;26:e50715 View
  7. Tung I, Balaji U, Hipwell A, Low C, Smyth J. Feasibility and acceptability of measuring prenatal stress in daily life using smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment and wearable physiological monitors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2024;47(4):635 View
  8. Alhammad N, Alajlani M, Abd-alrazaq A, Arvanitis T, Epiphaniou G. Patients and Stakeholders’ Perspectives Regarding the Privacy, Security, and Confidentiality of Data Collected via Mobile Health Apps in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Mixed Method Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2024;13:e54933 View
  9. Costa B, Vale N. Advances in Psychotropic Treatment for Pregnant Women: Efficacy, Adverse Outcomes, and Therapeutic Monitoring. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024;13(15):4398 View
  10. Alsahli S, Hor S. The adoption of mobile health applications by physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic in developing countries: The case of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 2024;4(2):100289 View