Published on in Vol 5, No 11 (2021): November

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/28329, first published .
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Tool in Routine Outpatient Diabetes Care: Mixed Methods Formative Pilot Study

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Tool in Routine Outpatient Diabetes Care: Mixed Methods Formative Pilot Study

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Tool in Routine Outpatient Diabetes Care: Mixed Methods Formative Pilot Study

Journals

  1. Holmen H, Singstad T, Ribu L, Jensen A, Weldingh N, Torbjørnsen A. Adapting a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Digital Outpatient Specialist Health Care Services for Type 1 Diabetes: User Involvement Study. JMIR Human Factors 2022;9(4):e38678 View
  2. Nielsen A, Appel C, Larsen B, Hanna L, Kayser L. Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2022;6(1) View
  3. Corathers S, Williford D, Kichler J, Smith L, Ospelt E, Rompicherla S, Roberts A, Prahalad P, Basina M, Muñoz C, Ebekozien O. Implementation of Psychosocial Screening into Diabetes Clinics: Experience from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Quality Improvement Network. Current Diabetes Reports 2023;23(2):19 View
  4. Tawfik B, Burgess E, Kosich M, Jaffe S, Guest D, Brown-Glaberman U, Pankratz V, Sussman A. Patient, provider, and nurse preferences of patient reported outcomes (PRO) and side effect management during cancer treatment of underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups, rural and economically disadvantaged patients: a mixed methods study. Cancer Causes & Control 2022;33(9):1193 View
  5. Jensen A, Schougaard L, Laurberg T, Hansen T, Lomborg K. Flexible patient‐reported outcome‐based telehealth follow‐up for type 1 diabetes: A qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 2023;37(3):662 View
  6. Skovlund S, Nicolucci A, Balk-Møller N, Berthelsen D, Glümer C, Perrild H, Kjær P, Nørgaard L, Troelsen L, Pietraszek A, Hessler D, Kaplan S, Ejskjær N. Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study. JMIR Research Protocols 2021;10(9):e28391 View
  7. Torbjørnsen A, Jensen A, Singstad T, Weldingh N, Holmen H. Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care 2023;11(6):e003628 View
  8. Porth A, Huberts A, Rogge A, Bénard A, Forbes A, Strootker A, Del Pozo C, Kownatka D, Hopkins D, Nathanson D, Aanstoot H, Soderberg J, Eeg‐Olofsson K, Hamilton K, Delbecque L, Ninov L, Due‐Christensen M, Leutner M, Simó R, Vikstrom‐Greve S, Rössner S, Flores V, Seidler Y, Hasler Y, Stamm T, Kautzky‐Willer A. Standardising personalised diabetes care across European health settings: A person‐centred outcome set agreed in a multinational Delphi study. Diabetic Medicine 2024;41(5) View
  9. Johansson U, Andreassen Gleissman S, Korkeila Liden M, Wickman M, Gustafsson B, Sjöberg S. Mixed methods study on the feasibility of implementing periodic continuous glucose monitoring among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting. Heliyon 2024;10(8):e29498 View
  10. Porth A, Seidler Y, Long P, Huberts A, Hamilton K, Stamm T, Kautzky-Willer A. Monitoring what matters to people with diabetes: Do we underestimate the importance of behaviour, attitude, and well-being?. Patient Education and Counseling 2024;128:108377 View