This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Development and Evaluation of Research Methods, Instruments and Tools (687) Engagement with and Adherence to Digital Health Interventions, Law of Attrition (576) Focus Groups and Qualitative Research for Human Factors Research (1125) Anxiety and Stress Disorders (1264) Depression and Mood Disorders; Suicide Prevention (1596) Users' and Patients' Needs for Mental Health Services (472)

Published on in Vol 4, No 10 (2020): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/22528, first published .
Consumer-Guided Development of an Engagement-Facilitation Intervention for Increasing Uptake and Adherence for Self-Guided Web-Based Mental Health Programs: Focus Groups and Online Evaluation Survey

Consumer-Guided Development of an Engagement-Facilitation Intervention for Increasing Uptake and Adherence for Self-Guided Web-Based Mental Health Programs: Focus Groups and Online Evaluation Survey

Consumer-Guided Development of an Engagement-Facilitation Intervention for Increasing Uptake and Adherence for Self-Guided Web-Based Mental Health Programs: Focus Groups and Online Evaluation Survey

Authors of this article:

Amelia Gulliver1 Author Orcid Image ;   Alison L Calear1 Author Orcid Image ;   Matthew Sunderland2 Author Orcid Image ;   Frances Kay-Lambkin3 Author Orcid Image ;   Louise M Farrer1 Author Orcid Image ;   Michelle Banfield1 Author Orcid Image ;   Philip J Batterham1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (14) Tweetations (1) Metrics

Journals

  1. Gulliver A, Calear A, Sunderland M, Kay-Lambkin F, Farrer L, Batterham P. Predictors of acceptability and engagement in a self-guided online program for depression and anxiety. Internet Interventions 2021;25:100400 View
  2. Batterham P, Calear A, Sunderland M, Kay-Lambkin F, Farrer L, Christensen H, Gulliver A. A Brief Intervention to Increase Uptake and Adherence of an Internet-Based Program for Depression and Anxiety (Enhancing Engagement With Psychosocial Interventions): Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(7):e23029 View
  3. Jones C, Gulliver D, Keegan D. A Brief Online Video-Based Intervention to Promote Mental Health Help-Seeking in the Context of Injuries for Athletes: A pilot study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2022;63:102281 View
  4. Parker E, Banfield M. Consumer Perspectives on Anxiety Management in Australian General Practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(9):5706 View
  5. Batterham P, Gulliver A, Sunderland M, Farrer L, Kay-Lambkin F, Trias A, Calear A. Factors Influencing Community Participation in Internet Interventions Compared With Research Trials: Observational Study in a Nationally Representative Adult Cohort. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e41663 View
  6. Bosbach K, Schoenenberg K, Martin A. Development and evaluation of an acceptance-facilitating intervention for an internet-based cognitive behavioral self-esteem training for adults with body dysmorphic symptoms. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 2023;37:100798 View
  7. Hagström J, Woodford J, von Essen A, Lähteenmäki P, von Essen L. Opt-out rates and reasons for non-participation in a single-arm feasibility trial (ENGAGE) of a guided internet-administered CBT-based intervention for parents of children treated for cancer: a nested cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2022;12(4):e056758 View
  8. Townsend A, Hertz A, D’Souza J, Wiese A. Advances in Psychotherapy with Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Advances in Psychiatry and Behavioral Health 2022;2(1):57 View
  9. Jardine J, Bowman R, Doherty G. Digital Interventions to Enhance Readiness for Psychological Therapy: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(8):e37851 View
  10. Busby Grant J, Gulliver A, Calear A, Farrer L, Batterham P. “I don’t have time”: an exploration of the role of time pressures in acceptance of internet interventions for mental health. Journal of Mental Health 2024;33(2):169 View
  11. Reyes-Portillo J, Judd E, Martin G, Kalver A, Taveras L, Rette D, Lekas H, Escobar M, Coyle-Eastwick S, King C, Masia Warner C. Increasing Engagement of College Students at Risk for Suicide in Online Intervention: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Technology in Human Services 2024;42(2):104 View
  12. Finucane A, Canny A, Mair A, Harrop E, Selman L, Swash B, Wakefield D, Gillanders D. A rapid review of the evidence for online interventions for bereavement support. Palliative Medicine 2025;39(1):31 View
  13. Geisler B, Petersen K, Hanke S, Schurer S, Schreiber A, Lämmle C, Batra A, Renner T, Brandhorst I. Ambivalent User Needs as a Challenge and Chance for the Design of a Web-Based Intervention for Gaming Disorder: Qualitative Interview Study With Adolescents and Young Adults. JMIR Formative Research 2025;9:e63258 View
  14. Charalampopoulou M, Ibrahim A, Prime H, Eddy N, Panetta L, Brown H, Desai S, Gray K, Lai M, Langdon P, Lunsky Y, McMorris C, Ritvo P, Tilleczek K, Tint A, Weiss J. “It fostered a greater appreciation for my little corner of the world”: A feasibility study of a therapeutic photography intervention for the well-being of autistic youth. Autism 2025 View