Published on in Vol 3, No 4 (2019): Oct-Dec

A Comprehensive Framework to Evaluate Websites: Literature Review and Development of GoodWeb

A Comprehensive Framework to Evaluate Websites: Literature Review and Development of GoodWeb

A Comprehensive Framework to Evaluate Websites: Literature Review and Development of GoodWeb

Journals

  1. Allison R, Hayes C, Young V, McNulty C. Evaluation of an Educational Health Website on Infections and Antibiotics in England: Mixed Methods, User-Centered Approach. JMIR Formative Research 2020;4(4):e14504 View
  2. Motoo Y, Yukawa K, Hisamura K, Arai I. Physician perspectives on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine and the national evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine information website: A mixed-method study. Integrative Medicine Research 2021;10(1):100454 View
  3. Silva A, Caravau H, Martins A, Almeida A, Silva T, Ribeiro Ó, Santinha G, Rocha N. Procedures of User-Centered Usability Assessment for Digital Solutions: Scoping Review of Reviews Reporting on Digital Solutions Relevant for Older Adults. JMIR Human Factors 2021;8(1):e22774 View
  4. Alsulami M, Khayyat M, Aboulola O, Alsaqer M. Development of an Approach to Evaluate Website Effectiveness. Sustainability 2021;13(23):13304 View
  5. Saunders C, Sierpe A, Stevens G, Elwyn G, Cantrell M, Engel J, Gonzalez M, Hayward M, Huebner J, Johnson L, Jimenez A, Little N, McKenna C, Onteeru M, Oo Khine M, Pogue J, Salinas Vargas J, Schmidt P, Thomeer R, Durand M. Co-Development of a Web Application (COVID-19 Social Site) for Long-Term Care Workers (“Something for Us”): User-Centered Design and Participatory Research Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(9):e38359 View
  6. Sippel A, Scheiderbauer J, Eklund D, Arnade S, Schmidt S, Kleiter I, Morrison R, Kofahl C, Heesen C. Development and evaluation of a website with patients experiences of multiple sclerosis: a mixed methods study. BMC Neurology 2022;22(1) View
  7. Sippel A, Riemann-Lorenz K, Pöttgen J, Wiedemann R, Drixler K, Bitzer E, Holmberg C, Lezius S, Heesen C. Validation of the German eHealth impact questionnaire for online health information users affected by multiple sclerosis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2022;22(1) View
  8. Biyyapu V, Jammalamadaka S, Jammalamadaka S, Chokara B, Duvvuri B, Budaraju R. Building an Expert System through Machine Learning for Predicting the Quality of a Website Based on Its Completion. Computers 2023;12(9):181 View
  9. Zhu Y, Song T, Zhang Z, Yu P. Developing an Instrument to Evaluate the Quality of Dementia Websites. Healthcare 2023;11(24):3163 View
  10. Wagner A, Milzer M, Steindorf K, Kiermeier S, Schmidt M, Maatouk I. Cancer-related fatigue: Quality, credibility, usability, and readability of information on websites of health care institutions in Germany. Patient Education and Counseling 2024;121:108135 View
  11. Marin B, Coulm B, Beghin D, Latour M, Béloni P, Toniolo J, Dechartres A, Tubach F, Vauzelle C, Elefant E. Évaluation de la satisfaction des professionnels de santé utilisateurs du site internet du CRAT et lancement d’une nouvelle version. Therapies 2024 View
  12. Reid N, Oberthier S, Cramm H, Beahm J, Reiser S, Cox M, Dena I, Hadjistavropoulos H. PSPNET Families Wellbeing Hub: A preliminary evaluation of online upstream supports for public safety personnel families. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health 2024;10(2):150 View
  13. Cheung M, Jones H, Eastwell N, Zhang T, Harford K, Bower C, Elliott E. Evaluation of the Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Hub Australia website. Drug and Alcohol Review 2024 View
  14. Rokhman A, Çömez P, Rosyadi S. Interactive model of government websites based on decision tree analysis and web quality 4.0. Journal of Governance and Regulation 2024;13(2, special issue):354 View