e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 17 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 6 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 5 JMIR Formative Research
- 5 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 JMIR Cancer
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Increasing emphasis on service users’ perspectives in measuring treatment outcomes and experiences has recently led to the introduction of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in SUD and other mental health services [19-22]. PROMs refer to individual, subjective treatment outcomes, including information about psychological well-being, quality of life, symptomatology, and physical functioning.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e65686
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Those digital health interventions hold potential for bridging the care gap by offering individualized support based on continuous health data derived from both subjective patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective wearable and sensor-based data.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e58266
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are questionnaires for the self-assessment of patients’ symptoms, well-being, and functional status associated with their health condition, without interpretation by a clinician or anyone else [1,2]. Well-validated PROMs are considered the gold standard for the collection of subjective health-related outcomes [3,4].
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e56625
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in medical research and patient care since researchers, clinicians, and decisions makers are becoming increasingly aware that the patients’ perspective is crucial when evaluating the efficacy of treatments and the quality of health services [1].
JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e49903
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In addition, the clinical value of the PROMs has not been established, and the adaptation of standardized PROMs used in research might not be straightforward because the measures are usually lengthy and time-consuming to answer for the patient and to interpret for the clinician. The use of PROMs in previous research has varied widely in terms of using one or several PROMs, using disease-specific or generic PROMs, and determining at what times or under which conditions the measures are used [11].
JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e52766
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Effectiveness of Telemedicine for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Umbrella Review
In addition, in recent years, an increasing number of studies have used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) to evaluate telemedicine services [8]. With the increasing maturity of telemedicine applications and higher evidence levels, the use of PROMs has increased.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e50090
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Interest in using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care has steadily increased. Until recently, systematically collecting patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer care to improve health outcomes, such as health-related quality of life (HRQOL), has not been supported by evidence. However, the impact on other measures, such as patient satisfaction and clinician-patient communication, has been consistently demonstrated [1-3].
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e48483
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide an indicator of surgical thresholds and treatment effects, with the potential to improve health care outcomes within the health care sector for these increasingly common and resource-intensive procedures. Guidelines have been produced regarding the types of PROMs that should be collected [1,2].
JMIR Form Res 2022;6(4):e30245
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
First, the selection criteria of our systematic review were restricted to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that are tested in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2 DM) only. The study on the development and validation of the National Diabetes Register Survey included patients with other forms of diabetes (ie, type 1 diabetes) [3], and, therefore, was excluded from our analysis.
J Med Internet Res 2022;24(3):e37957
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We appreciate the herculean effort undertaken to summarize all diabetes-related patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, we have some concerns.
First, despite the large amount of identified PROMs (N=238), there are still many PROMs missing [1]. In our systematic review of PROMs measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in people with type 2 diabetes (currently under review), which was performed in the same time period and using the same databases, we identified 116 HRQOL PROMS.
J Med Internet Res 2022;24(3):e36876
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS