e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 46 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 10 JMIR Formative Research
- 10 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 6 JMIR Human Factors
- 4 JMIR Medical Education
- 4 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 4 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 2 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
Identifying Strategies for Home Management of Ostomy Care: Content Analysis of YouTube
Reference 28: The burden of peristomal skin complications on an ostomy population as assessed by health utilityutility
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e66634
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Instagram as a Tool to Improve Human Histology Learning in Medical Education: Descriptive Study
In this line, our survey data reflected a high degree of satisfaction with the utility in the educational environment of these virtual activities (96.5% and 99.3% with multiple-choice questions and image-based questions). More recently, Prabhu and Munawar [11] evaluated 49 Instagram profiles dedicated to the dissemination and teaching of radiology, concluding that it is indeed a better application of this image-based social media platform due to its easy accessibility and appeal to students.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e55861
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Importantly, our findings also demonstrate satisfaction among patients who had previously used telehealth, and most previous users also recognized the clinical utility of telehealth for care monitoring. However, there were concerns among patients related to the comfort of using telehealth and the confidentiality of the private information shared through the technology.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e60843
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Reference 1: ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on theutility
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e57592
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The few studies to have tested the utility of Me SH terms in SRs have limitations, such as a small sample size or a lack of generalizability [14-20]. Finally, some studies simply compared the numbers of results retrieved for a given query but did not evaluate the results’ relevance [21].
To the best of our knowledge, only 1 study has extensively explored the relevance of Me SH terms with regard to the results of SRs [22].
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e53781
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Findings revealed that participants believed that WATs offer utility for monitoring and improving patient PA in a wide variety of clinical populations and health care settings. The study identified various metrics and device characteristics as critical, with the specific choice of metrics being contingent on the clinical context and patient factors. Software was acknowledged as a vital element, with most participants being unsatisfied with the currently available software.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2024;12:e55254
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The results of the SUS and Utility Scale queries are shown in Figures 5 and 6, respectively. The Cronbach α of the SUS was 0.89, implying good reliability, and the Cronbach α of the Utility Scale was 0.73, indicating acceptable reliability. We were unable to detect any gender differences in the SUS mean score (men: mean score 4.2, SD .63; women: mean score 4.3, SD .48; P=.35) or the Utility Scale mean score (men: mean score 4.1, SD .51; women: mean score 4.1, SD .49; P=.95).
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e47785
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS