e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 12 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3 JMIR Human Factors
- 2 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 2 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Dynamic Augmented Reality Cues for Telementoring in Minimally Invasive Surgeries: Scoping Review
Surgeons performing MIS have an indirect view of the operative view through the screen projecting the live camera scope feed and experience a longer learning curve as compared with open surgery [5]. Hence, specialized training is needed to develop sufficient expertise. While basic MIS skills are learned outside the operating room, intraoperative training is vital for attaining proficiency [5].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e63939
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This is not practical for real-time intraoperative coaching by surgeons and greatly increases the time spent on the activity to stop and restart the session during annotation.
Previous usability studies that used telestration [6-8] used a trackpad, mouse, or touchscreen during annotation mode and found that the trackpad or mouse performed best in the delineation of structures, while the touch screen was superior in conveying directional information [7].
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e57243
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We used a structured questionnaire (Multimedia Appendix 1) to conduct a survey in English by inviting gastroenterologists or GI surgeons from the Asia-Pacific region through open invitations to various medical associations. The questionnaire was based on the expectancy-value framework, major constructs of the Theory of Planned Behaviour research framework [16], and the Technology Acceptance Model measures [17].
JMIR AI 2024;3:e50525
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Except for case 4, where all surgeons chose a posterior approach, in the remaining cases, at least three of the 16 surgeons chose an anterior approach. These decisions differed among the same 3 surgeons each time (Figure 1). The predefined factors poorly explained the variability, either through univariate testing (Table 2) or with a multivariate model (R2=0.1).
JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e48321
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Smartphone and Mobile App Use Among Physicians in Clinical Practice: Scoping Review
The participants in the remaining studies were addressed as anesthetist consultants [34], pediatricians [35], specialists, or surgeons. Overall, 4 studies did not provide information on their clinical settings [5,33,35,36], 2 studies were conducted in hospitals [34,38], and the remaining studies were conducted in community health centers [22], large university surgical departments [37], rural practices [39], and health institutions [40].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023;11:e44765
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Cardiac surgery experts were identified as follows: cardiac anesthetists, cardiac surgeons, and anesthetists specializing in working with cardiac patients perioperatively or in intensive care.
JMIR Perioper Med 2022;5(1):e39907
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The authors investigated the surgeons’ preprocedure expectations of how the service would aid operative performance and patient outcomes, and their satisfaction after use of the service. We commend the authors for their work; however, we would like to highlight some caveats in their research.
Although this study presents interim results, we are concerned that the perceived future use of the service may be overestimated.
JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(2):e36681
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
All head and neck surgeons of the Saudi Society of Otolaryngology who worked in Saudi Arabia hospitals and consented to participate in this study were included. There were no exclusion criteria.
The total sample consisted of all head and neck surgeons of the Saudi Society of Otolaryngology in Saudi Arabia. A total of 22 participants were included in this study.
We adapted a questionnaire that consisted of 6 questions regarding actual practices and was previously designed and reviewed by Madana et al [10].
Interact J Med Res 2022;11(1):e24592
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The remote surgeons were asked to register patient- and intervention-related data and a rating of the level of complexity of each case. In addition, they were asked to provide subjective ratings of their estimated need and expectations for consultation during the procedure, and to report technical issues and their experience of how teleguidance contributed to performance and outcomes.
JMIR Hum Factors 2021;8(4):e30867
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS