e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 20 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 5 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 4 JMIR Aging
- 4 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 3 JMIR Human Factors
- 2 JMIR Formative Research
- 2 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Implementation of New Technologies in an Aged Care Social Day Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation
robot
JMIR Aging 2025;8:e60297
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The robot was introduced to the care staff and patients, and was used for 6 weeks. Care staff and family members were introduced to the robot and received training before starting the project. Patients and family members communicated through the robot regularly, but the robot did not replace actual visits.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e59764
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The research design framework for the prototype robot comprised three steps: using an evidence-based literature review and team meeting to design and develop the robot prototype, evaluating feasibility through collecting pre- and postassessment questionnaires, and exploring needs and acceptance through interviews with the target population, as illustrated in Figure 1.
The research design framework for the prototype robot used in community-based diabetes care.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e48226
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Automated Process for Monitoring of Amiodarone Treatment: Development and Evaluation
Notably, the existing routine process remained in operation during the whole period, with the manual routine executed without awareness of the robot, such that the physician’s orders constituted the real-world outcome and robot 2 worked in parallel producing outcomes only available to the research team. Paired orders, from the physician and robot 2, were compared.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65473
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We adopted an inclusive approach to how we considered a robot an AI-enabled robot. We considered a robot an AI-enabled robot if it has AI features according to our AI-enabled robot definition as mentioned in the Introduction section. Textbox 2 explains how each robot included in this scoping review is related to our AI-enabled definition.
JMIR Aging 2024;7:e55257
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This study fills this gap in the literature by investigating how older Singaporeans accept and interact with LOVOT (Love+Robot), a Japanese social robot.
Loneliness is not synonymous with being alone or living alone; a person can experience loneliness even when they are surrounded by other people.
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e56669
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Summary of the data extracted for the instruments identified through the systematic review.
a COIRS: Children’s Openness to Interacting With a Robot Scale.
b The name of the instrument was not provided in the original article.
c REI: Robot-Era Inventory.
d SAR: socially assistive robot.
e UNRAQ: Users’ Needs, Requirements, and Abilities Questionnaire.
f TSES-R: Technology-Specific Expectation Scale–R.
g GATo RS: General Attitudes Toward Robots Scale.
h SPRS: Social Perception of Robots Scale.
i SSRIT: Social Service Robot
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e55597
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The first indications that older adults liked to participate in robot-assisted group activities for physical activities are shown in [21,22]. The robot NAO was found suitable to be used in group settings for moving, memory training, entertainment, music, dancing, and games [23]. One study showed that older adults in a nursing home prefer walking with a robot rather than walking alone [24].
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2023;10:e48031
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In this protocol paper, we report on the study design of a single-group, interventional clinical study to test the feasibility of fully unsupervised therapy with an active hand rehabilitation robot in patients with subacute stroke.
JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e48485
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Additionally, the social robot Paro (an animal seal robot) was tested in Taiwan with 20 older adults in a long-term care facility for 8 weeks using a single-group pre-post quasi-experimental design and showed a statistical decrease in depression and loneliness and an increase in quality of life among the participants [8].
JMIR Aging 2023;6:e48646
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS