e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 102 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
CSV download: Download all 102 search results
(up to 5,000 articles maximum)
- 36 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 16 JMIR Formative Research
- 12 JMIR Human Factors
- 7 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 7 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 5 JMIR Medical Education
- 5 JMIR Research Protocols
- 3 JMIR AI
- 2 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 2 JMIR Cancer
- 2 JMIR Mental Health
- 2 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 1 JMIR Cardio
- 1 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
There has always been an asymmetric relationship between physicians and patients, given physicians’ superior knowledge of health matters [3]. The internet, however, has transformed these conditions. This raises questions about how technological artifacts are transforming the boundaries that have traditionally existed between the health care professions and patients regarding information and knowledge [4].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e63305
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The study revealed that users are significantly more comfortable sharing health data with physicians through noninternet methods, such as Bluetooth or NFC, compared with internet-based methods such as cloud services. This preference underscores the concerns users have regarding online data security and privacy. The findings suggest a need for health care providers and technology developers to offer secure offline data-sharing options to meet user comfort levels and build trust.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67414
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Health care providers (n=10), executive directors (n=8), and data support staff (n=8)
Primary care physicians (N=15)
Age (years): 25-64
Patients.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71186
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For the MMPFS, the CDC and RTI’s primary consideration was building survey instruments that offered busy physicians and facility administrators (targeted respondents for the MMPFS) a variety of options to reduce their response burden while maximizing response. To achieve this goal, the MMPFS full survey was programmed in web, mail, and phone modes, and a nonresponse follow-up survey (NRFU) was programmed in a web mode.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e52123
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
However, particularly nonoccupational physicians are frequently uncertain as to whether the clinical presentation of patients and their occupational history justify the reporting of an occupational disease. Furthermore, the results of an internet search are often inconclusive, particularly with regard to German occupational disease law.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e63857
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We surveyed a diverse group of health care professionals—including physicians, nurses, researchers, and educators—from multiple countries and practice settings. Using a cross-sectional survey design, we collected data on their familiarity with Chat GPT, how and why they used it, and their concerns about its integration.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e58801
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Increasingly, educators are turning to simulation-based medical education (SBME) to provide physicians and medical trainees with learning opportunities for HALO procedures and clinical encounters [2-4]. SBME has been defined as any educational activity that uses simulative aids to replicate clinical scenarios [5].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e53565
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Physicians emphasize that younger physicians who have grown up in an era of digital innovation are often more open to the use of modern technology in medical practice. Unlike the older generations, who may be more familiar with traditional methods of patient monitoring, young physicians already have an affinity for digital health solutions. Digital natives recognize the potential of m Health apps as efficient technologies for improving patient care.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e56666
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Trust is a crucial prerequisite for physicians in adopting AI [22], as AI is perceived as risky due to the complexity and unpredictability of its behavior [11]. Thus, the formation of trust in an AI-based system among physicians is influenced by the AI system’s representation and tangibility, that is how the underlying rationale of AI tools’ decision outcomes are presented to the user [12].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e64266
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
However, half of the physicians have to struggle with technical problems at least once a week, compared to 36% in 2020. Overall, frustration with the digitization process has increased [12].
While there is a wealth of research focusing on the patient perspective regarding digital health tools [13-15], there remains a lack of comprehensive evidence on how physicians perceive and integrate these technologies into their clinical practice.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e52544
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS