e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 12 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 5 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 2 JMIR Dermatology
- 2 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
There is variability in the portrayal of scientific evidence and uncertainty in the news media.
JMIR Infodemiology 2024;4:e51328
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Robust evidence supports pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) as a first-line intervention for the 3 predominant UI subtypes, which are stress, urgency, and mixed UI [5]. Data suggest that approximately 67% of women experience symptom improvement or resolution with PFMT [6]. Despite high UI prevalence and strong evidence to support behavioral interventions for UI, most women are untreated or undertreated for these conditions [7-9].
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e58551
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are high-quality, evidence-based statements that have been used by health care professionals to bridge the gap between policies, best practices, local contexts, and patient preferences [1]. Through recommendations, CPGs are beneficial to medical practices by decreasing variances and mistakes in clinical practice, reducing health care costs, and improving health outcomes [1,2].
JMIR Dermatol 2023;6:e43821
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Ten categories emerged from the content analysis: (1) evidence via references from other municipalities when procuring HWT, (2) evidence via documentation from suppliers when procuring, (3) evidence via benefits realization when procuring, (4) difficulties obtaining evidence when procuring, (5) Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) as a model used when implementing HWT, (6) organizational models when implementing, (7) value and benefits when evaluating implemented HWT, (8) survey use during follow-up and evaluation of HWT
JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e45626
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Patient-relevant outcomes are then assessed for each included study while focusing on study limitations, precision, the directness of evidence, the consistency of results, and possible confounders, among others. The certainty of evidence is then decided for each outcome, ranging from very low to high. The overall quality of evidence for the main health care question will depend on the lowest-rated critical outcome.
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e43928
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Reference 5: The absence of evidence is evidence of non-sense: cross-sectional study on the quality ofevidence
JMIR Dermatol 2022;5(4):e42759
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In all cases, patients or health care providers are interacting with evidence-based digital technologies to improve patients’ health [8].
We explain in this viewpoint why the current health care landscape, which we will call the “evidence-based health care paradigm,” does not allow for digital therapeutics to meet user needs and values and, consequently, does not reach successful implementation.
Interact J Med Res 2022;11(2):e39323
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The Development and Use of Chatbots in Public Health: Scoping Review
We examined the evidence for the development and use of chatbots in public health to assess the current state of the field, the application domains in which chatbot uptake is the most prolific, and the ways in which chatbots are being evaluated. Reviewing current evidence, we identified some of the gaps in current knowledge and possible next steps for the development and use of chatbots for public health provision. Our research questions are as follows.
JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(4):e35882
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The extracted data for relevant outcomes were categorized and summarized according to the tiers 1-3b evidence categories in the NICE evidence standards framework for DHTs described below. An overview of each study’s contribution to the respective evidence categories is presented in Table 2, and a more extensive version of the table, including the criteria for minimum evidence and best practice standards in all evidence categories, is presented in Multimedia Appendix 3 [22-37].
J Med Internet Res 2021;23(10):e27267
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS