e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 3 of 3 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 3 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Informal Caregivers Connecting on the Web: Content Analysis of Posts on Discussion Forums
Using a codebook thematic analysis approach to examine the data [40] with Dedoose (Socio Cultural Research Consultants), 2 researchers (MLF and CE) read through all the posts and coded the data. The entire author group discussed the codes, refined them reiteratively, and identified themes within the data. The author group also resolved any coding disagreements and resulting frequencies of each theme through discussions and collective agreements.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e64757
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A coding procedure (Multimedia Appendix 1 contains the complete codebook) was used to determine if each post pertained to a health-related motivation for cannabis use, a perceived adverse health effect of cannabis use, or neither. Two trained coders double coded each post independently, with κ values ranging from 0.790 to 0.856. Discrepancies were resolved by the two coders and the first author. This analysis served as a validation procedure for the rule-based classifier.
JMIR Form Res 2022;6(2):e35027
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The codebook included codes inductively derived from qualitative data [14]. KLF and SRM read transcribed qualitative data. Codes were independently assigned to text, grouped, and thematically analyzed to check for emerging themes. Analyses included within-group consensus or disagreement. Member checking with CPS was used to verify and/or resolve any dissimilar findings.
JMIR Form Res 2022;6(2):e29073
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS