Search Results (1 to 5 of 5 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 2 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 JMIR Cardio
- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
In addition, a shortened version of AFEQT (AFEQT-S; Multimedia Appendix 1), CAQ, and PSS-4 were collected weekly during treatment.
All analyses were performed using R [41]. Pretreatment, posttreatment, and 6-month follow-up data were included in a piecewise linear mixed-model analysis with a random intercept. Separate group-level slopes were estimated for the pre- to posttreatment assessment (Slope 1) and posttreatment to the 6-month follow-up assessment (Slope 2).
JMIR Cardio 2021;5(1):e24524
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03191565)
June 19, 2017
S-20160085
5159-00002 B
2008-58-0035
The Danish National Innovation Fund (grant number 5159-00002 B)
Centre for Telepsychiatry, Odense, Denmark
Research Unit for Telepsychiatry and E-mental Health, Odense, Denmark
Differences in electronic and paper-based self-monitoring in borderline personality disorder: which is most effective?
JMIR Res Protoc 2020;9(5):e17737
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The participants were given sticky notes and encouraged to place them on the whiteboard and discuss the reason(s) for placing the input as either a pro or a con. The discussion was moderated by the principal investigator (SHJ) and 1 of the cowriters (TS). Themes from earlier interviews were offered to the participants when statements differed from what was discussed in the focus group (theoretical sampling). The qualitative analysis of the focus groups was performed in different steps as discussed further.
JMIR Form Res 2019;3(3):e12852
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section