TY  - JOUR
AU  - Helweg-Joergensen, Stig
AU  - Schmidt, Thomas
AU  - Lichtenstein, Mia Beck
AU  - Pedersen, Susanne S
PY  - 2019
DA  - 2019/9/30
TI  - Using a Mobile Diary App in the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study
JO  - JMIR Form Res
SP  - e12852
VL  - 3
IS  - 3
KW  - borderline personality disorder
KW  - mHealth
KW  - implementation
KW  - focus groups
KW  - e-diary
KW  - mobile app
AB  - Background: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a disorder characterized by difficulties with regulating emotions and impulsive behavior. Long-term monitoring of progress during BPD psychotherapy constitutes a challenge using paper and pencil registration. Hence, a mobile app assessing emotions and progress in treatment may be useful. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of using the mDiary app as an adjunct to dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for the treatment of BPD. Methods: A total of 9 focus group interviews were conducted and analyzed according to the grounded theory approach. Furthermore, the usability of the mDiary app was examined using the System Usability Scale (SUS). The app was implemented in a standard DBT program as an adjunct to DBT. In total, 16 patients (age range 19-41 years) and 23 therapists (age range 25-64 years) from 5 Danish public outpatient psychiatric treatment facilities participated in the study. Results: Overall, patients were satisfied with the mDiary app, as it was “easy to use” and “always there.” Inside-out innovation, meaning new work tasks generated during implementation and communication of modifications needed in the app, was found to influence the perceived usability negatively among the interviewed therapists. The patients rated the usability as high (mean SUS score 81.2, SD 9.9), whereas therapists rated the mDiary app at an average level (mean 68.3, SD 14.3). Older age of the users correlated with lower usability ratings on the SUS score (Pearson r=−0.60). Conclusions: The mDiary app was considered as an acceptable and relevant way of registering DBT diary data for both patients and therapists generating increased long-term overview. Older users were overall more reluctant to accept this new technology in clinical practice. Time to align expectations among involved parties needs to be set aside when implementing this new approach to patient monitoring. Here, the focus should be on the realistic use of resources and expected impact on present clinical work. 
SN  - 2561-326X
UR  - http://formative.jmir.org/2019/3/e12852/
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/12852
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31573910
DO  - 10.2196/12852
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/12852
ER  -