Search Results (1 to 10 of 409 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 76 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 61 JMIR Research Protocols
- 48 JMIR Formative Research
- 38 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 34 Iproceedings
- 26 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 19 JMIR Human Factors
- 17 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 15 JMIR Medical Education
- 12 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 10 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 6 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 6 JMIR Serious Games
- 4 JMIR Aging
- 4 JMIR Cardio
- 4 JMIR Diabetes
- 4 JMIR Infodemiology
- 4 JMIR Nursing
- 3 JMIR Dermatology
- 3 JMIR Mental Health
- 3 JMIRx Med
- 2 JMIR AI
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIR Cancer
- 2 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 1 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 1 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Clinical Nurse Educators’ Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions: Protocol for a Scoping Review
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e66712
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A systematic review and meta-analysis by Di Lorito et al [46] found that such interventions can produce positive effects on cognitive abilities among people with MCI and dementia. Furthermore, Karakose et al [47] conducted a comprehensive bibliometric and science mapping analysis, revealing the evolving landscape of digital addiction research, which is pertinent to understanding user engagement with digital health tools.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e70177
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Our protocol was developed using the scoping review methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley [39] and further refined by Peters et al [40].
The central research question guiding this review was as follows: “What are the most frequently reported risk factors associated with suicidal ideation in the psychology and mental health literature?”
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e63272
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In a recent meta-analysis by Armache et al [31], the readability of 1124 education materials for patients with head and neck cancer was evaluated that was produced by professional societies, hospitals, and other organizations intended to inform patients, promote their engagement, and enhance their adherence to treatment plans. The mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level of these materials ranged from 8.8 to 14.8, with none of them meeting the recommended sixth-grade readability standard.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73337
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In April and May, fewer results were entered due to Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr affecting how well cadres could input data. Toward the study’s end, a reminder was sent to cadres by DTO-Pusdatin Ministry of Health and village leaders about data entry.
The comparison of total CU5 being measured and those reported through Whats App, and the linearity trend of total Whats App data reporting month by month. CU5: children under 5 years.
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e58752
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A more detailed overview of the eligibility criteria following the population, concept, and context framework can be found in the study by Mc Cartney et al [34].
Studies were included if they reported any DHTs designed and intended for the use of HCPs for the management of chronic pain among adults (Table 1). The types of eligible studies included interventional, observational, and descriptive studies fitting the inclusion criteria. No restrictions were placed on the time frame.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66457
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In total, 7 studies conducted between 2018 and 2023 were included, with 5 from the United States (Kar et al [29-31], Zhang et al [32], Edalati et al [33]), 1 from China (Shen et al [34]), and 1 from Taiwan (Chang et al [35]). Of these, 6 studies involved patients with breast cancer with additional cancers (eg, sarcoma, lymphoma, leukemia) in some cohorts.
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e63964
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Knowledge Sharing Maturity Model for Medical Imaging Departments: Development Study
Abzari et al [10] stated that knowledge sharing is considered an essential factor in successful institutional performance. It refers to the act of sharing both tacit and explicit knowledge, such as thoughts, ideas, and experiences from one person, group, or institution to another to formulate new knowledge [11]. Knowledge sharing is one of the challenges for health care institutions due to the variety of resources and knowledge.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e54484
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS