Published on in Vol 8 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/63858, first published .
Supporting Weight Loss Among Parents of Children With a Disability: Lessons Learned From a Single-Arm Pilot Study

Supporting Weight Loss Among Parents of Children With a Disability: Lessons Learned From a Single-Arm Pilot Study

Supporting Weight Loss Among Parents of Children With a Disability: Lessons Learned From a Single-Arm Pilot Study

Research Letter

Department of Kinesiology, Towson University, Towson, MD, United States

Corresponding Author:

Gerald J Jerome, PhD

Department of Kinesiology

Towson University

8000 York Road

Towson, MD, 21252

United States

Phone: 1 4107045283

Email: gjerome@towson.edu




Engaging parents is important when addressing childhood obesity [1]. In fact, a parent-only approach, where the weight loss program focuses on helping the parent lose weight and monitors weight change in the child holds potential to benefit both the parent and the child [2,3]. In this approach, the parent models healthy behaviors and makes decisions for the household (eg, shopping, meal preparation, active family outings) that would also support the child’s weight management. This approach holds particular benefit for families that include a child with a disability. In these families, not only are the children at risk of being excluded from more mainstream weight loss solutions, but parents with children who have a disability or health problem have reported high levels of mental and physical health problems and a need for self-care assistance [4-6]. Developing a weight loss program for the parents of children with a disability is an important next step in providing assistance to these families. This single-arm pilot study examined weight change from a 12-week, remotely delivered weight loss program among parents who have a child with a disability.


Overview

Participants were recruited through postings with advocacy groups. The study was conducted remotely using email, a web-based Qualtrics survey, and video conference sessions with study staff. Eligibility requirements included being a parent (aged ≥18 years), with a BMI ≥25 kg/m², who had a child (aged 8-18 years) with a mental or physical disability that was supported with an Individualized Education Plan or 504 Plan at school. We excluded individuals with a diagnosed eating disorder, current or planned pregnancy, or planned weight loss surgery. The primary aim was to examine the 12-week weight change of the parent. We also examined program adherence.

Parents self-reported demographic information (February 2021 to December 2022) and scales that used cellular technology sent weight data to the research team for both data collection (at baseline, weeks 12 and 24) and accountability during the weight loss program.The 12-week weight loss program included weight loss materials sent via email, weekly video-based coaching calls, and weekly tailored emails. Participants received evidence-based lifestyle recommendations of regular self-weighing, decreasing caloric intake, gradually increasing physical activity to 150 minutes/week, tracking of these behaviors, and an initial weight loss goal of 5 pounds. Coaches worked with the participants to identify food or drink that was calorically dense, of low nutritional value (eg, sugar beverages, fast foods, baked goods), and eaten frequently (eg, daily). Then coaches worked with the participants to identify strategies to eliminate those items from their diet. Similar weight loss programs were successful in previous pilot studies [7,8].

Ethical Considerations

All parents provided informed consent, the study was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Towson University Institutional Review Board (1409, 1181).


We screened 33 parents and enrolled 13. Participants were female, with a median age of 44 (IQR 42.5 to 48.5) years, and 76.9% (10/13) were non-Hispanic White (Table 1). Three participants discontinued the weight loss program (in weeks 3, 8, and 12). Table 2 shows compliance with weekly coaching calls (median 12, IQR 10.5 to 12) and weight tracking (median 12, IQR 10 to 12). Completer analyses using the Wilcoxon signed-ranked test (α=.05) showed a significant reduction in weight from baseline to week 12 (end of the program; n=10, median –3, IQR –5.2 to –1.4 kg; P=.02) but not week 24 (follow-up; n=10, median –3.9, IQR –4.9 to –0.7 kg; P=.07).

Table 1. Participant characteristics.

Parent (N=13)Child (N=13)
Age (years), median (IQR)44 (42.5-48.5)12 (11-16.5)
Weight (kg), median (IQR)88.8 (80.9-105.6)a
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR)34 (29.7-39.9)
Sex, n (%)


Female13 (100)10 (76.9)

Male0 (0)3 (23.1)
Race and ethnicity, n (%)


Non-Hispanic White10 (76.9)8 (61.5)

Non-Hispanic Black2 (15.4)2 (15.4)

Hispanic0 (0)2 (15.4)

Other1 (7.7)1 (7.7)

aNot applicable.

Table 2. Participant compliance and program effectiveness.

End of program (week 12)Follow-up (week 24)
Weekly coaching calls completed, median (IQR)

All participants (N=13)12 (10.5 to 12)a

Completers (n=10)12 (12 to 12)
Weeks with at least 1 weight tracked, median (IQR)

All participants (N=13)12 (10 to 12)

Completers (n=10)12 (12 to 12)
Weeks with some diet tracking, median (IQR)

All participants (N=13)12 (10 to 12)

Completers (n=10)12 (11.8 to 12)
Weeks with some physical activity tracking, median (IQR)

All participants (N=13)12 (11 to 12)

Completers (n=10)12 (12 to 12)
Weight change (kg), median (IQR)

Completers (n=10)–3 (–5.2 to –1.4)–3.9 (–4.9 to –0.7)
Weight change (%), median (IQR)

Completers (n=10)–3.6 (–5.5 to –1.6)–4.1 (–5.6 to –1.1)
Achieved 5 lbs weight loss goal, n (%)

Completers (n=10)7 (70)6 (60)

aNot applicable.


This was a single-arm pilot study of a 12-week weight loss program for parents with a child who has a disability. Statistically significant short-term weight loss demonstrated the feasibility of this remotely delivered program. There was high compliance with coaching calls and weight tracking, suggesting the parents were interested in weight loss. However, program improvements are needed to reduce dropouts and enhance long-term weight loss for all participants. Both completers with weight gain (data not shown) were single parents. The burden of childcare varies greatly across disabilities [5] and can limit the time available for parental self-care, especially for single parents. Solutions tailored to family needs may include providing healthy meals or childcare to allow parents time to engage in recommended lifestyle changes. In addition, mothers of children with disabilities have expressed the need for mental health support but find it challenging to get assistance [9]. Programming that supports the mental and physical health of the parents by combining stress management with weight loss management could lead to improved weight loss [10]. This was a small study without a control group, yet the results support the further development of a weight loss program to help these parents with long-term weight management.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Towson University BTU and the Towson University College of Health Professions.

Data Availability

Participants granted the study team permission to report aggregated data. None of the participants granted permission for data sharing.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

  1. Hampl SE, Hassink SG, Skinner AC, Armstrong SC, Barlow SE, Bolling CF, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and treatment of children and adolescents with obesity. Pediatrics. Feb 01, 2023;151(2). [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Hammersley ML, Jones RA, Okely AD. Parent-focused childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity ehealth interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. Jul 21, 2016;18(7):e203. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Loveman E, Al-Khudairy L, Johnson RE, Robertson W, Colquitt JL, Mead EL, et al. Parent-only interventions for childhood overweight or obesity in children aged 5 to 11 years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Dec 21, 2015;2015(12):CD012008. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Brehaut JC, Kohen DE, Garner RE, Miller AR, Lach LM, Klassen AF, et al. Health among caregivers of children with health problems: findings from a Canadian population-based study. Am J Public Health. Jul 2009;99(7):1254-1262. [CrossRef]
  5. Novak-Pavlic M, Rosenbaum P, Gazzi Macedo L, Di Rezze B, Yong J, Noori A, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical, psychological, and socioeconomic well-being outcomes of parents of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: protocol for a systematic review. JMIR Res Protoc. Jul 28, 2022;11(7):e38686. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Cohn LN, Pechlivanoglou P, Lee Y, Mahant S, Orkin J, Marson A, et al. Health outcomes of parents of children with chronic illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr. Mar 2020;218:166-177.e2. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Jerome GJ, Lisman PJ, Dalcin AT, Clark A. Weight management program for first responders: feasibility study and lessons learned. Work. 2020;65(1):161-166. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Depuy J, Molina-Morales J, Conover AJ, Jerome GJ. Accessible weight loss program for adults who are legally blind: a pilot study. Disabil Health J. Oct 2023;16(4):101502. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Gilson K, Davis E, Johnson S, Gains J, Reddihough D, Williams K. Mental health care needs and preferences for mothers of children with a disability. Child Care Health Dev. May 2018;44(3):384-391. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Lyzwinski LN, Caffery L, Bambling M, Edirippulige S. A systematic review of electronic mindfulness-based therapeutic interventions for weight, weight-related behaviors, and psychological stress. Telemed J E Health. Mar 2018;24(3):173-184. [CrossRef] [Medline]

Edited by A Mavragani; submitted 01.07.24; peer-reviewed by NS Wright, L Vogtle; comments to author 13.08.24; revised version received 24.08.24; accepted 18.09.24; published 07.10.24.

Copyright

©Payson Wisniewski, Julia Depuy, Cassandra Kim, Olivia Garrison, Gerald J Jerome. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 07.10.2024.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.