Published on in Vol 8 (2024)

This is a member publication of Michigan State University

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/59837, first published .
Willingness to Be Contacted via a Patient Portal for Health Screening, Research Recruitment, and at-Home Self-Test Kits for Health Monitoring: Pilot Quantitative Survey

Willingness to Be Contacted via a Patient Portal for Health Screening, Research Recruitment, and at-Home Self-Test Kits for Health Monitoring: Pilot Quantitative Survey

Willingness to Be Contacted via a Patient Portal for Health Screening, Research Recruitment, and at-Home Self-Test Kits for Health Monitoring: Pilot Quantitative Survey

1Public Health Sciences, Michigan State University + Henry Ford Health, , 1 Ford Place, Suite 5E, Detroit, MI, , United States

2College of Nursing, University of South Florida, , Tampa, FL, , United States

Corresponding Author:

Elizabeth Lockhart, MPH, PhD


Background: Patient portals are being increasingly used by health systems in the United States. Although some patients use portals for clinical use, patient perspectives on using portals for research-related activities, to complete health screenings, and to request at-home self-test kits are unclear.

Objective: We aimed to understand patient perspectives on using electronic health portals for research; health-related screenings; and patient-initiated, home-based self-testing.

Methods: Patients (N=105) from the Patient Engaged Research Center at a large, urban, midwestern health system completed a 23-item web-based survey on patient portal (MyChart) use and willingness to use the patient portal for research, risk assessments, and self-test kits. Frequencies and percentages were generated.

Results: Almost all participants (102/105, 97.1%) had accessed MyChart at least once, with most (44/102, 43.1%) indicating they logged in at least once per month. Participants indicated logging into MyChart to check laboratory results or other health data (89/105, 84.8%), because they received a message to log in (85/105, 81%), and to message their health care professional (83/105, 79%). Fewer participants logged in to see what medications they had been prescribed (16/105, 15.2%) and to learn more about their health conditions (29/105, 27.6%). Most participants indicated logging into MyChart on a computer via a website (70/105, 66.7%) or on a smartphone via an app (54/105, 51.4%). When asked about how likely they would be to participate in different types of research if contacted via MyChart, most (90/105, 85.7%) said they would be likely to answer a survey, fill out a health assessment (87/105, 82.9%), or watch a video (86/105, 81.9%). Finally, participants would be willing to answer risk assessment questions on MyChart regarding sleep (74/101, 73.3%), stress (65/105, 61.9%), diabetes (60/105, 57.1%), anxiety (59/105, 56.2%), and depression (54/105, 51.4%) and would be interested in receiving an at-home self-test kit for COVID-19 (66/105, 62.9%), cholesterol (63/105, 60%), colon cancer (62/105, 59%), and allergies (56/105, 53.3%). There were no significant demographic differences for any results (all P values were >.05).

Conclusions: Patient portals may be used for research recruitment; sending research-related information; and engaging patients to answer risk assessments, read about health information, and complete other clinical tasks. The lack of significant findings based on race and gender suggests that patient portals may be acceptable tools for recruiting research participants and conducting research. Allowing patients to request self-test kits and complete risk assessments in portals may help patients to take agency over their health care. Future research should examine if patient portal recruitment may help address persistent biases in clinical trial recruitment to increase enrollment of women and racial minority groups.

JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e59837

doi:10.2196/59837

Keywords



Patient portals are widely implemented throughout health care systems in the United States. As part of the 2014 Cures Act [1], these secure, web-based applications can give patients convenient access to their personal health information anytime they have access to an internet connection. In 2020, about 60% of individuals in the United States were offered access to a patient portal, and almost 40% accessed one [2]; however, national data regarding access and use of patient portals in the United States after the COVID-19 pandemic have not yet been released.

Patients use patient portals for a variety of clinical functions, including viewing laboratory results, requesting refills, messaging health care professionals, requesting appointments, and viewing educational materials related to their health care and self-management improvement [2,3]. Patients’ willingness to use portals may be influenced by their age, ethnicity, education level, health literacy, and health status [4,5]. Some barriers, such as concerns regarding confidentiality [6], preferring to speak directly with their physician [7,8], and technology access [3], also limit an individual’s engagement with patient portals.

Increasing the scope of functions within a patient portal may help facilitate patient access to health care, increase engagement, and allow patients to take agency over their health care. Despite their potential, portals have been underused for providing access to screenings, risk assessments, and patient-initiated self-test kits. Offering self-testing in portals provides increased access to health care for patients who may have transportation issues or fear entering a health facility in person for stigmatized conditions, such as HIV and sexually transmitted infections. In addition to clinical use, portals have the potential to be used to recruit patients for participation in research studies [9]. Patients have reported a preference for being contacted for research opportunities via electronic methods [10]. However, recruitment rates via patient portals vary; some studies reported recruiting fewer patients [11] when using patient portals versus other methods (eg, over the phone, in person, and via letters), while others were able to enroll more patients [12]. Additionally, the impact of patient portals on equitable recruitment is unclear. Research has found that White patients, when recruited via portals, are more likely to participate in research compared to Black, Hispanic, or Asian patients [13]. However, the increased engagement with patient portals among racial and ethnic minority patient groups following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic [14] has the potential to increase exposure to recruitment and participation in research. The types of research that patients would participate in if approached via a patient portal are unclear; it is also unclear if patients would be willing to complete research tasks within the portal itself.

Patient portals offer a variety of benefits to patients, but opportunities remain to broaden their use. Patients would benefit from further access to these portals and possibly even broader utilization of what patient portals can offer, such as answering risk assessments and self-testing. Further research is needed to determine patient preferences for using portals and health conditions for which patients may be willing to use patient portals. This exploratory work examines how patients view patient portals for screening, risk assessments, self-testing, and research.


Study Population and Participant Recruitment

Participants were recruited from a convenience sample within the Patient Engaged Research Center (PERC) at Henry Ford Health to participate in a brief electronic survey. Any person with experience as a patient or caregiver could become a patient advisor within the PERC by completing an application, phone screen, and onboarding workshop. The role of a patient advisor includes, but is not limited to, providing feedback about ways to improve health care. A Qualtrics (Qualtrics International Inc) link for the survey was initially sent to all 406 patient advisors via email and a monthly electronic newsletter; 105 responded and completed the survey. Reminder emails were sent to patients approximately 2 weeks and 4 weeks after the initial email to remind those who had not yet completed the survey.

Survey Instrument

A total of 23 questions were developed by the research team regarding the patient portal (MyChart; Epic Systems Corporation), including questions about using the patient portal for research purposes and for requesting self-test kits for health. Participants were asked to provide information on their race (Black, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander), age, marital status (married, widowed, divorced, separated, or never married), and gender (male, female, nonbinary, another gender, or prefer not to say).

Responses to questions regarding reading information about health conditions on MyChart, answering screening questions on MyChart, and whether participants would likely participate in research if contacted via MyChart were measured on a 5-point Likert scale (extremely likely to extremely unlikely). Participants were asked if they had ever heard of preexposure prophylaxis (yes, no, or unsure) and which method of HIV testing they would prefer (at the doctor’s office, taking a home-based test on their own, or not wanting or needing an HIV test). Participants were also asked how they access MyChart, which health topics (diabetes, blood pressure, HIV, drug use, alcohol use, tobacco use, cancer, cholesterol, depression, stress, anxiety, physical activity, diet, sleep, asthma, use of seat belts, immunizations, and sexual history) they would be willing to answer questions about in MyChart, and which self-test kits (colon cancer, COVID-19, HIV, sexually transmitted infections, allergies, cholesterol, influenza, urinary tract infections, alcohol use, and illicit drug use) they would be interested in receiving if they were provided free of charge.

Data Analysis

All data were exported, cleaned, and uploaded into SPSS (IBM Corp). Frequencies and descriptive statistics were generated. Chi-square tests were run to examine whether significant differences existed among demographic variables.

Ethical Considerations

The PERC is covered by an overarching institutional review board (IRB) approval at Henry Ford Health (IRB#16766) for patient advisors to fill out surveys and provide preliminary feedback. This study was covered under a blanket IRB approval for research conducted among PERC patient advisors and was considered preparatory to research; participants did not need to sign a consent form. All study data were deidentified. Anyone who completed the survey and indicated interest was entered into a raffle for three US $75 gift cards.


Participant Characteristics

Participants were on average 57 (SD 14.35) years old (Table 1). Most identified as White (69/105, 65.7%) and female (80/105, 76.2%). Over half were married (60/105, 57.1%). For all results presented, there were no significant differences in responses by gender or race (all P values were >.05). All participant characteristics can be found in Table 1.

Table 1. Participant characteristics (total sample: N=105).
CharacteristicsParticipants, n (%)
Gender
Male23 (21.9)
Female80 (76.2)
Nonbinary/other2 (1.9)
Age (years)
18‐242 (1.9)
25‐4417 (16.2)
45‐6449 (46.7)
≥6537 (35.2)
Race and ethnicity
White69 (65.7)
Black31 (29.5)
Another race5 (4.8)
Marital status
Married60 (57.1)
Widowed6 (5.7)
Divorced18 (17.1)
Never married21 (20)
Ever accessed MyChart102 (97.1)

Patient Portal Usage

Almost all participants had accessed MyChart (102/105, 97.1%), with the majority accessing it at least once per month (44/102, 43.1%). There were various reasons why patients used MyChart, and patients reported various methods of accessing MyChart (Table 2).

Table 2. Frequency of logging into, reasons to log into, and methods of accessing MyChart.
Participants, n (%)a
Frequency of MyChart log-in
Daily6 (5.9)
At least once a week30 (29.4)
At least once a month44 (43.1)
At least once within 6 months17 (16.7)
At least once a year3 (2.9)
Never2 (2)
Reasons to log into MyChart
Because I received a message/text/email to log in85 (81)
To pay a bill51 (48.6)
To message my provider83 (79)
To schedule/reschedule an appointment62 (59)
To check laboratory results/other health data89 (84.8)
To refill medication40 (38.1)
To learn more about health conditions29 (27.6)
To see which medications I have been prescribed16 (15.2)
Methods of accessing MyChart
On a smartphone via the app54 (51.4)
On a smartphone via the website27 (25.7)
On a computer via the website70 (66.7)
On a tablet via the app13 (12.4)
On a tablet via the website10 (9.5)

aParticipants could select more than 1 option or none. As such, n values and percentages do not add up to 105 and 100%, respectively, at all instances.

Research via Patient Portal

Participants were likely to participate in different types of research if they were contacted by researchers in MyChart, including answering surveys, watching videos, and completing health assessments. They were also willing to answer questions to assess their risk for health conditions, including diabetes, HIV, and substance use (Table 3).

Table 3. Participants’ willingness to participate in research and risk assessments in MyChart and preferences for research recruitment.
Participants, n (%)a
Somewhat or very likely to participate in research if contacted via MyChart
Answer a survey90 (85.7)
Watch a video86 (81.9)
Fill out a health assessment87 (82.9)
Research that involves a medical device66 (62.9)
To give biomedical samples (blood, saliva, hair sample)72 (68.6)
Most favored way to hear about research studies
MyChart message38 (38.8)
Text message12 (12.9)
Telephone call3 (3.3)
Email23 (24)
Letter from provider14 (14.7)
Provider telling me about opportunities verbally at my appointment16 (16.8)
Being willing to answer risk assessment questions on MyChart for the following conditions
Diabetes60 (57.1)
HIV33 (31.4)
Drug use37 (35.2)
Alcohol use42 (40)
Tobacco use35 (33.3)
Depression54 (51.4)
Stress65 (61.9)
Anxiety59 (56.2)
Sleep74 (70.5)
Sexual history35 (33.3)

aParticipants could select more than 1 option or none. As such, n values and percentages do not add up to 105 and 100%, respectively, at all instances.

Self-Test Kits

When asked what self-test kits they would be willing to receive if free of charge, participants indicated interest in several health conditions (Table 4).

Table 4. Interest in receiving a self-test kit.
Test kit typeParticipants, n (%)a
Colon cancer62 (59)
COVID-1966 (62.9)
HIV17 (16.2)
Sexually transmitted infections23 (21.9)
Allergies56 (53.3)
Cholesterol63 (60)
Influenza51 (48.6)
Urinary tract infections53 (50.5)
Alcohol use13 (12.4)
Illicit drug use13 (12.4)
None6 (5.7)
All27 (25.7)

aParticipants could select more than 1 option or none. As such, n values and percentages do not add up to 105 and 100%, respectively.


Principal Findings

Electronic health records and their patient portals, such as MyChart, have become increasingly common. We found that patients overwhelmingly use MyChart and are willing to use it to answer risk assessments, participate in research, watch videos, read health information, and complete surveys.

Importantly, we found no significant demographic differences in having used MyChart, accessing MyChart, completing activities within MyChart, and being willing to use MyChart for research purposes (all P values were >.05). The majority of our participants (38/98, 38.8%) were willing to not only be contacted to participate in research via the portal but also complete research-related activities, such as taking risk assessments (87/105, 82.9%) and viewing videos (86/105, 81.9%) in the portal. The lack of significant results in this study is in contrast to previous research. Other research has found differences in patient portal use based on demographic factors [15-17]. However, those studies were almost exclusively conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic. As Mai and colleagues [14] found, COVID-19 may be leading to a shrinking of the racial digital divide, as access and use of portal functionalities have expanded among racial minority groups. Patient portals may be tools for reaching large numbers of patients [18] for research purposes while potentially increasing access to research participation for women [19] and racial minority groups [14], who have historically not been equally represented in research. Future research should examine if research recruitment via patient portals can enroll participants who align with the demographic makeup of the health care system.

Participants in our research were generally willing to complete risk assessments via the patient portal and receive self-test kits, including those for stigmatized topics like HIV and substance use. In a similar fashion, a scoping meta-analysis by Gnambs and Kasper [20] found that individuals are more likely to disclose sensitive behaviors in computer-assisted surveys. Future research should examine whether answering questions about stigmatized topics in patient portals results in increased patient–health care professional communication or preventive care regarding those topics. Self-testing for HIV and substance use is important, as individuals who may not seek a health care professional for testing may be more comfortable or willing to test on their own [21,22]. As the TakeMeHome project found [23], providing HIV self-test kits gives options to people who may not be able or willing to test otherwise. Future research should examine if offering patients HIV self-test kits via the patient portal increases HIV testing in health care systems.

There are some limitations to this research. First, this study occurred with patients who were part of the PERC. Patients who participate in activities with the PERC may be different from the health care system patient population overall. For example, they are more likely to participate in research because they are already part of a research center and are more engaged with the health care system. Second, participants in this research were more likely to be female than male. Female individuals, compared to male individuals, have been found to be more likely to use patient portals [24]. The results may have been different if more male individuals participated. Finally, the survey for this research was distributed electronically. It may be that people who participate in web-based surveys are more likely to feel comfortable doing health-related activities electronically.

Conclusions

Patient portals allow patients to both have access to their electronic health information and interact with the health care system. They are becoming increasingly more common for clinical communication, but as we found, they can also be used for research recruitment and sending research-related information. Patients generally prefer to hear about research studies via portals and are willing to use them to answer risk assessments, read about health information, and complete other clinical tasks. Furthermore, patients would be interested in receiving self-test kits for various health conditions, including those for sensitive health conditions such as HIV. Patient portals are relatively novel tools for engaging patients in a variety of research and clinical activities, and patient portal use may be an ideal way to engage patients in research related to sensitive health conditions.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the patients from Henry Ford Health’s Patient Engaged Research Center for their willingness to participate in this research. Funding for this research was supported by a Henry Ford Health Internal Grant (A30999).

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' Contributions

EL and DT researched literature and conceived this study. LC was involved in gaining ethical approval and in patient recruitment. EL, DT, and JG contributed to writing. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

  1. 21st Century Cures Act. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2020. URL: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/selected-amendments-fdc-act/21st-century-cures-act [Accessed 2024-11-07]
  2. What is a patient portal? Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. 2017. URL: https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-patient-portal [Accessed 2024-11-07]
  3. Chu D, Lessard D, Laymouna MA, et al. Understanding the risks and benefits of a patient portal configured for HIV care: patient and healthcare professional perspectives. J Pers Med. Feb 19, 2022;12(2):314. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Gordon NP, Hornbrook MC. Differences in access to and preferences for using patient portals and other eHealth technologies based on race, ethnicity, and age: a database and survey study of seniors in a large health plan. J Med Internet Res. Mar 4, 2016;18(3):e50. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Irizarry T, Dabbs AD, Curran CR. Patient portals and patient engagement: a state of the science review. J Med Internet Res. Jun 23, 2015;17(6):e148. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Powell KR. Patient-perceived facilitators of and barriers to electronic portal use. Comput Inform Nurs. Nov 2017;35(11):565-573. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Lyles CR, Allen JY, Poole D, Tieu L, Kanter MH, Garrido T. “I Want to Keep the Personal Relationship With My Doctor”: understanding barriers to portal use among African Americans and Latinos. J Med Internet Res. Oct 3, 2016;18(10):e263. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Tieu L, Sarkar U, Schillinger D, et al. Barriers and facilitators to online portal use among patients and caregivers in a safety net health care system: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. Dec 3, 2015;17(12):e275. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Sherman SE, Langford AT, Chodosh J, Hampp C, Trachtman H. Use of patient portals to support recruitment into clinical trials and health research studies: results from studies using MyChart at one academic institution. JAMIA Open. Oct 28, 2022;5(4):ooac092. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Miller HN, Lindo S, Fish LJ, et al. Describing current use, barriers, and facilitators of patient portal messaging for research recruitment: perspectives from study teams and patients at one institution. J Clin Transl Sci. Apr 5, 2023;7(1):e96. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Samuels MH, Schuff R, Beninato P, et al. Effectiveness and cost of recruiting healthy volunteers for clinical research studies using an electronic patient portal: a randomized study. J Clin Transl Sci. Dec 2017;1(6):366-372. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Gleason KT, Ford DE, Gumas D, et al. Development and preliminary evaluation of a patient portal messaging for research recruitment service. J Clin Transl Sci. May 25, 2018;2(1):53-56. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  13. Kannan V, Wilkinson KE, Varghese M, et al. Count me in: using a patient portal to minimize implicit bias in clinical research recruitment. J Am Med Inform Assoc. Aug 1, 2019;26(8-9):703-713. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Mai F, Ko DG, Shan Z, Zhang D. The impact of accelerated digitization on patient portal use by underprivileged racial minority groups during COVID-19: longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res. Aug 9, 2023;25:e44981. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. Schember CO, Scott SE, Jenkins CA, et al. Electronic patient portal access, retention in care, and viral suppression among people living with HIV in Southeastern United States: observational study. JMIR Med Inform. Jul 25, 2022;10(7):e34712. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Turner K, Clary A, Hong YR, Tabriz AA, Shea CM. Patient portal barriers and group differences: cross-sectional national survey study. J Med Internet Res. Sep 17, 2020;22(9):e18870. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Nishii A, Campos-Castillo C, Anthony D. Disparities in patient portal access by US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMIA Open. Dec 16, 2022;5(4):ooac104. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Tsai R, Bell EJ 3rd, Woo H, Baldwin K, Pfeffer MA. How patients use a patient portal: an institutional case study of demographics and usage patterns. Appl Clin Inform. Jan 2019;10(1):96-102. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. Carini E, Villani L, Pezzullo AM, et al. The impact of digital patient portals on health outcomes, system efficiency, and patient attitudes: updated systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res. Sep 8, 2021;23(9):e26189. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Gnambs T, Kaspar K. Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysis. Behav Res Methods. Dec 2015;47(4):1237-1259. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Iribarren S, Lentz C, Sheinfil AZ, et al. Using an HIV self-test kit to test a partner: attitudes and preferences among high-risk populations. AIDS Behav. Nov 2020;24(11):3232-3243. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  22. Flowers P, Riddell J, Park C, et al. Preparedness for use of the rapid result HIV self-test by gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM): a mixed methods exploratory study among MSM and those involved in HIV prevention and care. HIV Med. Apr 2017;18(4):245-255. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Hecht J, Sanchez T, Sullivan PS, DiNenno EA, Cramer N, Delaney KP. Increasing access to HIV testing through direct-to-consumer HIV self-test distribution - United States, March 31, 2020-March 30, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Sep 24, 2021;70(38):1322-1325. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Anthony DL, Campos-Castillo C, Lim PS. Who isn’t using patient portals and why? Evidence and implications from a national sample of US adults. Health Aff (Millwood). Dec 2018;37(12):1948-1954. [CrossRef] [Medline]


IRB: institutional review board
PERC: Patient Engaged Research Center


Edited by Amaryllis Mavragani; submitted 06.05.24; peer-reviewed by Leland E Hull, Nancy Gordon; final revised version received 24.09.24; accepted 25.09.24; published 22.11.24.

Copyright

© Elizabeth Lockhart, Jordan Gootee, Leah Copeland, DeAnne Turner. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 22.11.2024.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.