Published on in Vol 8 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/39211, first published .
Comparing Self-Reported Running Distance and Pace With a Commercial Fitness Watch Data: Reliability Study

Comparing Self-Reported Running Distance and Pace With a Commercial Fitness Watch Data: Reliability Study

Comparing Self-Reported Running Distance and Pace With a Commercial Fitness Watch Data: Reliability Study

JMIR Formative Res: Comparing Self-Reported Running Distance and Pace With a Commercial Fitness Watch Data: Reliability Study https://t.co/XvCOzjAlyo https://t.co/KnK78wyLOR

1:48 PM · Jan 04, 2024

0
1

RT @jmirpub: JMIR Formative Res: Comparing Self-Reported Running Distance and Pace With a Commercial Fitness Watch Data: Reliability Study…

1:48 PM · Jan 04, 2024

0
1

????‍♀️⏱️Our latest paper comparing the reliability of self-reported running distance and pace with commercial fitness watches is now published #OpenAcess @jmirpub. Thanks to an EU grant & the @_Runningthrough study volunteers who shared their running data during the Covid pandemic. https://t.co/E04Rsj2LnG

10:47 AM · Jan 05, 2024

3
0

First @_Runningthrough paper. Reliability of self-report vs wearable fitness watch. 485 ppl prospectively followed for 3602 participant weeks. Good reliability across gender & age. @stefankluzek @JoStocks #OpenScience https://t.co/Vrgom293w2

6:55 PM · Jan 11, 2024

6
0

RT @DrGSBullock: First @_Runningthrough paper. Reliability of self-report vs wearable fitness watch. 485 ppl prospectively followed for 360…

4:08 PM · Jan 13, 2024

8
1