Published on in Vol 7 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/49459, first published .
Strengths and Weaknesses of ChatGPT Models for Scientific Writing About Medical Vitamin B12: Mixed Methods Study

Strengths and Weaknesses of ChatGPT Models for Scientific Writing About Medical Vitamin B12: Mixed Methods Study

Strengths and Weaknesses of ChatGPT Models for Scientific Writing About Medical Vitamin B12: Mixed Methods Study

Authors of this article:

Omar Abuyaman1 Author Orcid Image

Journals

  1. Khalifa A, Ibrahim M. Artificial intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT involvement in scientific and medical writing, a new concern for researchers. A scoping review. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research 2024;42(4):1770 View
  2. Akintande O. Artificial versus natural intelligence: Overcoming students' cheating likelihood with artificial intelligence tools during virtual assessment. Future in Educational Research 2024;2(2):147 View
  3. Alaqlobi O, Alduais A, Qasem F, Alasmari M. Artificial intelligence in applied (linguistics): a content analysis and future prospects. Cogent Arts & Humanities 2024;11(1) View
  4. Zhong J, Xing Y, Hu Y, Lu J, Yang J, Zhang G, Mao S, Chen H, Yin Q, Cen Q, Jiang R, Chu J, Song Y, Lu M, Ding D, Ge X, Zhang H, Yao W. The policies on the use of large language models in radiological journals are lacking: a meta-research study. Insights into Imaging 2024;15(1) View
  5. Yu H, Fan L, Li L, Zhou J, Ma Z, Xian L, Hua W, He S, Jin M, Zhang Y, Gandhi A, Ma X. Large Language Models in Biomedical and Health Informatics: A Review with Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research 2024;8(4):658 View
  6. Chen A, Qilleri A, Foster T, Rao A, Gopalakrishnan S, Niezgoda J, Oropallo A. Generative Artificial Intelligence: Applications in Scientific Writing and Data Analysis in Wound Healing Research. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 2024;37(11&12):601 View
  7. Gosak L, Štiglic G, Pruinelli L, Vrbnjak D. PICOT questions and search strategies formulation: A novel approach using artificial intelligence automation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2025;57(1):5 View
  8. Salman H, Ahmad M, Ibrahim R, Mahmood J. Systematic analysis of generative AI tools integration in academic research and peer review. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 2025;15(1):e202502 View
  9. Pandya S, Alessandri Bonetti M, Liu H, Jeong T, Ziembicki J, Egro F. Burn Patient Education in the Modern Age: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Performance Answering Common Questions on Burn Injury and Management. Journal of Burn Care & Research 2025 View
  10. Chan A, Baker W, Abazia D, Bauman J, DeVane C, Goodlet K, Hall N, Hicks J, Jones E, Lu C, Moore D, Nelson N, Putney K, Sosa A, Trujillo T, Zhou C. Impact of artificial intelligence on future clinical pharmacy research and scholarship. JACCP: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY 2025;8(4):311 View
  11. Jongkind R, Elings E, Joukes E, Broens T, Leopold H, Wiesman F, Meinema J. Is your curriculum GenAI-proof? A method for GenAI impact assessment and a case study. MedEdPublish 2025;15:11 View
  12. de Almeida T, de Oliveira N, He C, Rocha C, Teixeira M, Rogers P, Kocsis K. Using Generative Pre-Trained Transformer-4 (GPT-4), ffmpeg, and Microsoft Azure to Aid in Creating a Text-to-Video Generation Tool to Improve Safety Shares and Incident Descriptions in the Mining Industry. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 2025 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Triplett W. Pioneering Paradigms in Organizational Research and Consulting Interventions. View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Salman H, Aliif M, Ibrahim R, Mahmood J. 2024 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT). Technology Readiness for Generative AI Among Academic Researchers View
  2. Alchokr R, Starzew E, Saake G, Leich T, Krüger J. Proceedings of the 24th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. The Impact of AI Language Models on Scientific Writing and Scientific Peer Reviews: A Systematic Literature Review View