Published on in Vol 7 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/44705, first published .
Assessment of App-Based Versus Conventional Survey Modalities for Reproductive Health Research in India, South Africa, and the United States: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Assessment of App-Based Versus Conventional Survey Modalities for Reproductive Health Research in India, South Africa, and the United States: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Assessment of App-Based Versus Conventional Survey Modalities for Reproductive Health Research in India, South Africa, and the United States: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study

Journals

  1. Harley K, Watson A, Robertson S, Vitzthum V, Shea A. Menstrual Cycle Characteristics of U. S. Adolescents According to Gynecologic Age and Age at Menarche. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 2024;37(4):419 View
  2. Hennegan J, Orozco A, Head A, Marino J, Jayasinghe Y, Lim M. Menstrual cup acceptability and functionality in real‐world use: A cross‐sectional survey of young people in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2024 View
  3. deSouza P, Shea A, Vitzthum V, Duarte F, Hanly C, Timmons M, Huguelet P, Sammel M, Ratti C, Braun D, Nethery R. The effect of air pollution exposure on menstrual cycle health using self-reported data from a mobile health app: a prospective, observational study. The Lancet Planetary Health 2025;9(5):e364 View
  4. Mohan S, Jenkins J. Flowing data: women’s views and experiences on privacy and data security when using menstrual cycle tracking apps. Oxford Open Digital Health 2025;3 View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Hudig A, Singh J. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Intimate Data Sharing: Enhancing Transparency and Control in Fertility Tracking View