This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions (2803) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (1870) Clinical Communication, Electronic Consultation and Telehealth (678)

Published on in Vol 6, No 5 (2022): May

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/35950, first published .
Individuals’ Perceptions as a Substitute for Guidelines and Evidence: Interview Study Among Clinicians on How They Choose Between In-Person and Remote Consultation

Individuals’ Perceptions as a Substitute for Guidelines and Evidence: Interview Study Among Clinicians on How They Choose Between In-Person and Remote Consultation

Individuals’ Perceptions as a Substitute for Guidelines and Evidence: Interview Study Among Clinicians on How They Choose Between In-Person and Remote Consultation

Authors of this article:

Amia Enam1 Author Orcid Image ;   Heidi C Dreyer1 Author Orcid Image ;   Luitzen De Boer1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Cook R, Haydon H, Thomas E, Ward E, Ross J, Webb C, Harris M, Hartley C, Burns C, Vivanti A, Carswell P, Caffery L. Digital divide or digital exclusion? Do allied health professionals’ assumptions drive use of telehealth?. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 2025;31(3):376 View
  2. Norberg B, Austad B, Kristiansen E, Zanaboni P, Getz L. The Impact and Wider Implications of Remote Consultations for General Practice in Norway: Qualitative Study Among Norwegian Contract General Practitioners. JMIR Formative Research 2024;8:e63068 View