This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions (2410) Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (787) E-Health Policy and Health Systems Innovation (230) Formative Studies and eHealth/mHealth Development (524) Theoretical Frameworks and Concepts (252) eHealth Infrastructures (345)

Published on in Vol 5, No 7 (2021): July

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/18198, first published .
Conceptualizing Usability for the eHealth Context: Content Analysis of Usability Problems of eHealth Applications

Conceptualizing Usability for the eHealth Context: Content Analysis of Usability Problems of eHealth Applications

Conceptualizing Usability for the eHealth Context: Content Analysis of Usability Problems of eHealth Applications

Authors of this article:

Marijke Broekhuis1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Lex van Velsen1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Linda Peute3 Author Orcid Image ;   Meilani Halim4 Author Orcid Image ;   Hermie Hermens1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (16) Tweetations (11) Metrics

Journals

  1. Jamil P, Yusof N, Karuppiah K, Rasdi I, How V, Tamrin S, Mani K, Naeni H, Sambasivam S, Nata D. The Impacts of Urban Air Pollution on Malaysian Traffic Police: A Framework for Evaluation of Real-Time Monitoring System on Its Usability. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2022;1013(1):012003 View
  2. Zhao S, Cao Y, Cao H, Liu K, Lv X, Zhang J, Li Y, Davidson P. Chinese Version of the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation. Frontiers in Psychology 2022;13 View
  3. Broekhuis M, van Velsen L, Daramola J. Improving usability benchmarking for the eHealth domain: The development of the eHealth UsaBility Benchmarking instrument (HUBBI). PLOS ONE 2022;17(2):e0262036 View
  4. Pernencar C, Aguilar P, Saboia I, Barreto I, Theophilo R, Oliveira D, Monteiro L. Systematic mapping of digital health apps – A methodological proposal based on the World Health Organization classification of interventions. DIGITAL HEALTH 2022;8:205520762211290 View
  5. Virtanen L, Kaihlanen A, Kainiemi E, Saukkonen P, Heponiemi T. Patterns of acceptance and use of digital health services among the persistent frequent attenders of outpatient care: A qualitatively driven multimethod analysis. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  6. Shamsujjoha M, Grundy J, Khalajzadeh H, Lu Q, Li L. Developer and End-User Perspectives on Addressing Human Aspects in Mobile eHealth Apps. Information and Software Technology 2024;166:107353 View
  7. Revenäs Å, Ström L, Cicchetti A, Ehn M. Towards multimodal boosting of motivation for fall-preventive physical activity in seniors: An iterative development evaluation study. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  8. Bonometti F, Bernocchi P, Vitali A, Savoldelli A, Rizzi C, Scalvini S. Usability of a continuous oxygen saturation device for home telemonitoring. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023;9 View
  9. Scheckel B, Schmidt K, Stock S, Redaèlli M. Patient Portals as Facilitators of Engagement in Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Heart Disease: Scoping Review of Usage and Usability. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e38447 View
  10. Kujala S, Simola S, Wang B, Soone H, Hagström J, Bärkås A, Hörhammer I, Cajander Å, Johansen Fagerlund A, Kane B, Kharko A, Kristiansen E, Moll J, Rexphepi H, Hägglund M, Johansen M. Benchmarking usability of patient portals in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2024;181:105302 View
  11. Savolainen K, Kujala S. Testing Two Online Symptom Checkers With Vulnerable Groups: Usability Study to Improve Cognitive Accessibility of eHealth Services. JMIR Human Factors 2024;11:e45275 View
  12. Stanimirovic D. Failures and fallacies of eHealth initiatives: Are we finally able to overcome the underlying theoretical and practical orthodoxies?. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  13. Pan D, Nilsson E, Rahman Jabin M. A review of incidents related to health information technology in Swedish healthcare to characterise system issues as a basis for improvement in clinical practice. Health Informatics Journal 2024;30(3) View
  14. Khalifa M, Magrabi F, Gallego B. Validating and Updating GRASP: An Evidence-Based Framework for Grading and Assessment of Clinical Predictive Tools. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update 2024:100161 View
  15. Keller V, Ercsey I, Printz-Markó E. Evaluation criteria for lifestyle applications – The role of MAUQ factors in satisfaction. Management & Marketing 2024;19(3):498 View
  16. Glaser S, Fraterman I, van Brummelen N, Tibollo V, Del Campo L, Mallo H, Wilgenhof S, Wilk S, Gisko V, Khadakou V, Cornet R, Ottaviano M, Medlock S. Usability and Usefulness of a Symptom Management Coaching System for Cancer Patients treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: a Comparative Mixed-Methods Study (Preprint). JMIR Formative Research 2024 View