This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions (2208) e-Mental Health and Cyberpsychology (1402) Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (747) Quantified Self and Wellness (71) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2743) Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth (899) Anxiety and Stress Disorders (1005) Depression and Mood Disorders; Suicide Prevention (1282) Users' and Patients' Needs for Mental Health Services (381)

Published on in Vol 5, No 2 (2021): February

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/21737, first published .
Development and Feasibility of a Digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy–Based Intervention for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Pilot Acceptability Study

Development and Feasibility of a Digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy–Based Intervention for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Pilot Acceptability Study

Development and Feasibility of a Digital Acceptance and Commitment Therapy–Based Intervention for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Pilot Acceptability Study

Authors of this article:

Nicola R Hemmings1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jamie M Kawadler2 Author Orcid Image ;   Rachel Whatmough3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Sonia Ponzo2 Author Orcid Image ;   Alessio Rossi5 Author Orcid Image ;   Davide Morelli2, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Geoffrey Bird2, 7, 8 Author Orcid Image ;   David Plans2, 7, 9 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (6) Tweetations (6) Metrics

Journals

  1. Nicolaou P, Merwin R, Karekla M. Acceptability and feasibility of a gamified digital eating disorder early-intervention program (AcceptME) based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 2022;25:26 View
  2. Ito T, Tomizawa E, Yano Y, Takei K, Takahashi N, Shaku F. Experience of symptom control, anxiety and associating factors in a palliative care unit evaluated with Support Team Assessment Schedule Japanese version. Scientific Reports 2021;11(1) View
  3. Blodgett J, Birch J, Musella M, Harkness F, Kaushal A. What Works to Improve Wellbeing? A Rapid Systematic Review of 223 Interventions Evaluated with the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scales. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19(23):15845 View
  4. Smits M, Kim C, van Goor H, Ludden G. From Digital Health to Digital Well-being: Systematic Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2022;24(4):e33787 View
  5. Moulaei K, Moulaei R, Bahaadinbeigy K. The most used questionnaires for evaluating the usability of robots and smart wearables: A scoping review. DIGITAL HEALTH 2024;10 View
  6. Ito T, Tomizawa E, Yano Y, Akiyama D, Konishi H, Takei K, Ikeda M, Takahashi N, Shaku F. Transitional Changes of Anxiety, Pain and Other Symptoms in Cancer Patients Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit, Evaluated Using the Support Team Assessment Schedule – Japanese Version. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine® 2024 View