This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions (2193) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (456) Tools, Programs and Algorithms (237) New Methods (902) Human Factors and Usability Case Studies (739)

Published on in Vol 5, No 10 (2021): October

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/20458, first published .
Comparing a Multimedia Digital Informed Consent Tool With Traditional Paper-Based Methods: Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing a Multimedia Digital Informed Consent Tool With Traditional Paper-Based Methods: Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparing a Multimedia Digital Informed Consent Tool With Traditional Paper-Based Methods: Randomized Controlled Trial

Authors of this article:

Fuad Abujarad1 Author Orcid Image ;   Peter Peduzzi2 Author Orcid Image ;   Sophia Mun3 Author Orcid Image ;   Kristina Carlson1 Author Orcid Image ;   Chelsea Edwards1 Author Orcid Image ;   James Dziura1 Author Orcid Image ;   Cynthia Brandt1, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Sandra Alfano5 Author Orcid Image ;   Geoffrey Chupp5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (12) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Miron-Shatz T, Yaniv H. Digital consent: engaging patients with plain language and better communication. BMJ 2022:o2378 View
  2. Kassam I, Ilkina D, Kemp J, Roble H, Carter-Langford A, Shen N. Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e42507 View
  3. Nath A, Rachakonda R, Thakuria P. Development of a novel multimedia tool for obtaining informed consent from survivors of sexual offenses and its comparison with the conventional method. Medical Journal Armed Forces India 2022 View
  4. Kopp M, Roth J, Geisler F, Daniel S, Ruettinger T, Treutlein C, Balbach E, Heiss R, Wetzl M, El Amrani N, Cavallaro A, Uder M, May M. Digitized and structured informed patient consent before contrast-enhanced computed tomography: feasibility and benefits in clinical routine. Insights into Imaging 2022;13(1) View
  5. Haack M, Fischer N, Frey L, Sparwasser P, Dotzauer R, Duwe G, Haferkamp A, Borgmann H. Digital informed consent for urological surgery - randomized controlled study comparing multimedia-supported vs. traditional paper-based informed consent concerning satisfaction, anxiety, information gain and time efficiency. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 2023 View
  6. Cohen E, Byrom B, Becher A, Jörntén-Karlsson M, Mackenzie A. Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2023;25:e43883 View
  7. Idossa D, Patel S, Florez N. Enhancing Patient Retention in Clinical Trials—Strategies for Success. JAMA Oncology 2023;9(8):1031 View
  8. Haack M, Reisen K, Ghazy A, Stroh K, Frey L, Sparwasser P, Duwe G, Mager R, Haferkamp A, Borgmann H. Understanding tumor localization in multiparametric MRI of the prostate—effectiveness of 3D printed models. Frontiers in Surgery 2023;10 View
  9. Cummins M, Soni H, Ivanova J, Ong T, Barrera J, Wilczewski H, Welch B, Bunnell B. Narrative review of telemedicine applications in decentralized research. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2024;8(1) View
  10. Alqaydi A, Williams E, Nanji S, Zevin B. Optimizing the consent process for emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy using an interactive digital education platform: a randomized control trial. Surgical Endoscopy 2024;38(5):2593 View
  11. Van Oirschot G, Doherty C, Mohsenifar H. Designing multimedia patient education materials for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of patient education videos. PLOS ONE 2024;19(5):e0297394 View
  12. VAN OIRSCHOT G, DOHERTY C. A Review of the Design of Multimedia Patient Educational Materials in Low Back Pain Research. Physical Therapy Research 2024 View