This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions (2410) Email Communication, Web-Based Communication, Secure Messaging (160) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (479) Personal Health Records, Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records, Patient Portals (573) HIV/AIDS/STI Prevention and Care (873) Vaccination and Immunization in the Digital Age (374)

Published on in Vol 4, No 9 (2020): September

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/17154, first published .
eHealth Communication With Clients at Community-Based HIV/AIDS Service Organizations in the Southern United States: Cross-Sectional Survey

eHealth Communication With Clients at Community-Based HIV/AIDS Service Organizations in the Southern United States: Cross-Sectional Survey

eHealth Communication With Clients at Community-Based HIV/AIDS Service Organizations in the Southern United States: Cross-Sectional Survey

Authors of this article:

Lisa Tisdale Wigfall1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations (3) Metrics

    Original Paper

    Division of Health Education, Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States

    Corresponding Author:

    Lisa Tisdale Wigfall, MCHES, PhD

    Division of Health Education

    Department of Health and Kinesiology

    Texas A&M University

    2929 Research Parkway

    College Station, TX, 77843-4243

    United States

    Phone: 1 979 845 4779

    Fax:1 979 847 8987

    Email: lwigfall@tamu.edu


    Background: Providing HIV/STD testing and prevention education, medical and nonmedical case management, housing assistance, transportation services, and patient navigation are just a few examples of how community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations will help the United States realize the goals of the updated National HIV/AIDS Strategy.

    Objective: In this study, the aim was to assess electronic data security confidence level, electronic communication behaviors, and interest in using eHealth communication tools with clients of staff at community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations.

    Methods: Staff were recruited from 7 community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations in the southern United States (3 in South Carolina and 4 in Texas). The principal investigator used state department of health websites to identify community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations. Staff were included if they provided HIV/STD prevention education to clients. A recruitment letter was sent to community-based HIV/AIDS service organization leaders who then used snowball sampling to recruit eligible staff. Chi-square tests were used.

    Results: Among staff (n=59) who participated in the study, 66% (39/59) were very or completely confident that safeguards are in place to keep electronically shared information from being seen by other people; 68% (40/59) used email, 58% (34/59) used text messages, 25% (15/59) used social media, 15% (9/59) used a mobile app, 8% (5/59) used web-enabled videoconferencing, and 3% (2/59) used other tools (eg, electronic medical record, healthnavigator.com website) to communicate electronically with their clients. More than half were very interested in using eHealth communication tools in the future for sharing appointment reminders (67%, 38/59) and general health tips (61%, 34/59) with their clients. Half were very interested in using eHealth communication tools in the future to share HIV medication reminders with their clients (50%, 29/59). Forty percent (23/59) were very interested in using eHealth communication tools to share vaccination reminders with their clients.

    Conclusions: Community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff had some level of confidence that safeguards were in place to keep electronically shared information from being seen by other people. This is critically important given the sensitivity of the information shared between community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff and their clients, and because many staff were very interested in using eHealth communication tools with their clients in the future. It is very likely that eHealth communication tools can be used in community settings to improve health outcomes across the HIV care continuum; in the interim, more research is needed to better understand factors that may facilitate or impede community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff use and client acceptability.

    JMIR Form Res 2020;4(9):e17154

    doi:10.2196/17154

    Keywords

    eHealth; communication; HIV; disparities; inequalities 


    Background

    The 4 main goals of the updated National HIV/AIDS Strategy [1] are reducing new HIV infections, increasing access to care and improving health outcomes for people living with HIV, reducing HIV-related disparities and health inequities, and achieving a more coordinated national response to the HIV epidemic. Providing HIV/STD testing and prevention education, medical and nonmedical case management, housing assistance, transportation services, and patient navigation are just a few examples of how community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations will help the United States realize its vision to

    become a place where new HIV infections are rare, and when they do occur, every person, regardless of age, gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, or socio-economic circumstance, will have unfettered access to high quality, life-extending care, free from stigma and discrimination
    [1]

    Electronic health (eHealth) is a field in which health service delivery and information sharing are enhanced through the use of the internet and related technologies [2]. A recent study provides the following 3 clearly defined domains of eHealth: (1) health in our hands (using eHealth technologies to monitor, track, and inform health), (2) interacting for health (using digital technologies to enable health communication among practitioners and between health professionals and clients or patients), and (3) data enabling health (collecting, managing, and using health data) [3].

    In the field of HIV/AIDS prevention, eHealth communication tools improve health outcomes across the HIV care continuum, which include diagnosis of HIV infection; linkage, engagement, retention in HIV care; and achieving viral suppression [4,5]. Recent studies [6-14] have shown how social media and technologies such as avatar-led and smartphone games can be leveraged to prevent the spread of HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases, as well as improve HIV-related health outcomes such as diagnosis of HIV infection; linkage, engagement, retention in HIV care; and medication adherence.

    Unfortunately, some community-based HIV/AIDS service organization clients will encounter barriers using eHealth communication tools to access health services such as HIV/STD testing and HIV care. While some researchers have studied eHealth literacy, acceptability, adoption, and attitudes among individuals such as people living with HIV and men who have sex with men, the target audience is usually the client and not staff [15-19], though some have studied eHealth adoption and attitudes among health care providers in clinical settings [15].

    Objective

    While eHealth communication tools have been studied from the perspective of community-based HIV/AIDS service organization clients, little is known about electronic communication beliefs, behaviors, and attitudes of community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff. This is unfortunate because researchers have shown that community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff are a trusted source of information about health or medical topics, in addition to their primary role aimed at improving health outcomes along the HIV care continuum [20]. In this study, the principal investigator assessed staff confidence in electronic communication data security, electronic communication behaviors with clients, and attitudes toward using eHealth communication tools with their clients in the future among community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff. The long-term goal is to build the capacity of community-based organizations to leverage their ability to reach marginalized vulnerable populations with eHealth communication tools that can improve their overall health and well-being, especially among people living with HIV who are underrepresented (compared to men who have sex with men) such as women, transgender persons, and older adults.


    Data Collection

    The principal investigator (LTW) used state department of health websites to identify community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations. A recruitment email was sent to community-based HIV/AIDS service organization leaders who were asked to invite their eligible staff to participate in the survey. Staff were included if they provided HIV/STD prevention education to clients. No other inclusion or exclusion criteria were used. Positions that were commonly held by participants were case manager, counselor, patient navigator (including linkage specialist or care coordinator), social worker, program coordinator or manager, prevention coordinator, and outreach specialist.

    Staff were recruited from 7 community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations in nonclinical urban settings located in the southern United States. In May 2016 and June 2016, the principal investigator (LTW) conducted a paper and pencil survey with from staff at 3 community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations located in South Carolina. Approximately two-and-a-half to three years later (October 2018 to December 2018 and May 2019) when the principal investigator relocated to Texas, the survey was converted to an online format (Qualtrics XM) and distributed to staff at 4 community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations located in Texas. These study details have been previously published [20-22].

    Measures

    Sociodemographic Characteristics

    To describe the sociodemographic characteristics of community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, race/ethnicity, and education were assessed. See Multimedia Appendix 1 for more details.

    Electronic Data Security Confidence Level

    To assess electronic data security confidence level, community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff were asked, “How confident are you that safeguards are in place to keep electronically shared information from being seen by other people?” This question was adapted from the following Health Information National Trends Survey validated question [23]: “How confident are you that safeguards (including the use of technology) are in place to protect your medical record from being seen by people who aren’t permitted to see them?” Participants responded using a 5-point Likert scale. Response options were coded as 0 (not at all confident) to 4 (completely confident). For analysis, this item was recoded into a dichotomous variable where 1 (completely or very confident) and 0 (somewhat or a little confident). See Multimedia Appendix 2 for more details.

    Electronic Communication With Clients

    A dichotomous (yes or no) variable was used to assess the following modes that community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff used to communicate electronically with their clients: email, text message, social media, web-enabled videoconference, mobile app, or something else. See Multimedia Appendix 2 for more details. A composite score was calculated so that a higher value represented the modes of electronic communication that staff used more.

    Future eHealth Communication Tools With Clients

    To assess interest in using eHealth communication tools with clients in the future, community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff were asked, “How interested are you in electronically sharing the following types of health-related information with your clients: appointment reminders, HIV medication reminders, vaccination reminders, and general health tips?” Response options ranged from 1 (not at all interested) to 4 (very interested). See Multimedia Appendix 2 for more details. For analysis, this item was recoded into a dichotomous variable, 1 (very interested) or 0 (somewhat, a little, or not all interested). A composite score was calculated so that a higher value represented more modes of eHealth communication that staff were interested in using to communicate with their clients in the future.

    Data Analysis

    Data for this cross-sectional study were analyzed using Stata/SE (version 16.1; StataCorp LLC). Median (range) or frequency (percentage) were calculated for sociodemographic characteristics, electronic data security confidence level, electronic communication with clients, and future eHealth communication with clients. Chi-square tests were performed to examine bivariate associations between electronic data security confidence level and the following: sociodemographic characteristics, electronic communication with clients, and future eHealth communication with clients. P<.05 was used to determine statistical significance.

    Ethics

    This study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards at the University of South Carolina and Texas A&M University.


    Participants

    Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics and median (range) values of the key measures for staff (n=59) at community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations located in the southern United States. The median age for staff was 44 years old (range: 21-70, n=56). Most were younger than 50 years old (36/59, 64%). More than half were female (35/59, 59%), and 41% (24/59) were a sexual minority. Only 10% (6/59) were Hispanic; the majority were non-Hispanic Black or African American (44/59, 74%). All had at least a high school diploma or GED, with 46% (27/59) having earned an undergraduate degree and 25% (15/59) having earned a master’s degree.

    Table 1. Sociodemographic and eHealth communication characteristics of staff at community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations located in the southern United States (n=59).
    CharacteristicValue
    Age in years (n=56), median (range)44 (21-70)
    Sex (n=59), n (%)

    		Male24 (41)

    		Female35 (59)
    Sexual orientation (n=59), n (%)

    		Straight, that is, not lesbian or gay35 (59)

    		Lesbian or gay20 (34)

    		Bisexual3 (5)

    		Preferred not to say1 (2)
    Marital status (n=59), n(%)

    		Single, never been married29 (49)

    		Married or living as married24 (41)

    		Divorced4 (7)

    		Separated2 (3)
    Race/ethnicity (n=59), n (%)

    		Hispanic6 (10)

    		Black or African American44 (74)

    		White7 (12)

    		Asian1 (2)

    		Multiple1 (2)
    Education (n=59), n (%)

    		High school diploma/GED/some college17 (29)

    		Undergraduate degree27 (46)

    		Postgraduate degree15 (25)
    Electronic data security confidence level (n=59), median (range)3 (1-4)
    Electronic communication with clientsa (n=59), median (range)2 (0-5)
    Future eHealth communication with clientsb (n=56), median (range)2 (0-4)

    aEmail, text, social media, web-enabled videoconference, mobile app, something else (eg, electronic medical record, healthnavigator website).

    bAppointment, medication, vaccination reminders, or general health tips.

    Electronic Data Security Confidence Level

    All were at least a little confident that safeguards are in place to keep electronically shared information from being seen by other people—Table 1 shows that the median confidence level was 3 (range 1-4) (ie, 3 indicates very confident). Among 59 staff, 66% (39/59) were very or completely confident and 34% (20/59) were somewhat or a little confident that safeguards are in place to keep electronically shared information from being seen by other people. Table 2 shows that there were no statistically significant differences in electronic data security confidence level between community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff based on sociodemographic characteristics (age: P=.73, sex: P=.23, sexual orientation: P=.63, marital status: P=.53, race/ethnicity: P=.77, education: P=.82).

    Table 2. Bivariate associations between sociodemographic characteristics and eHealth communication modes of staff at community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations by electronic data security confidence level (n=59).
    CharacteristicAll (n=59), n (%)Electronic data security confidence levelP value




    		Completely or very confident, (n=39), n (%)Somewhat or a little confident (n=20), n (%)
    Sociodemographic




    		Age in yearsa, <5036 (64)25 (66)11 (61).73

    		Sex, female35 (59)21 (54)14 (70).23

    		Sexual orientation, sexual minorityb24 (41)15 (38)9 (45).63

    		Marital status, unmarriedc35 (59)22 (56)13 (65).53

    		Race/ethnicity


    		.77


    		Hispanic6 (10)3 (8)3 (15)


    		Black or African American44 (74)29 (74)15 (75)


    		White7 (12)5 (12)2 (10)


    		Asian1 (2)1 (3)0


    		Multiple1 (2)1 (3)0

    		Education


    		.82


    		High school/GED/some college17 (29)12 (31)5 (25)


    		Undergraduate degree27 (46)18 (46)9 (45)


    		Postgraduate degree15 (25)9 (23)6 (30)
    eHealth Communication




    		Electronic communication with clients, any moded52 (88)33 (85)19 (95).24

    		Future eHealth communication with clients, very interested





    		Appointment reminderse38 (67)26 (68)12 (63).69


    		Medication remindersf29 (50)21 (55)8 (40).27


    		Vaccination reminderse23 (40)18 (47)5 (26).13


    		General health tipsa34 (61)21 (57)13 (68).40

    aData were missing for 3 individuals.

    bLesbian or gay, bisexual, or preferred not to say.

    cDivorced, separated, or single.

    dEmail, text, social media, web-enabled videoconference, mobile app, something else (eg, electronic medical record, healthnavigator website).

    eData were missing for 2 individuals.

    fData were missing for 1 individual.

    Electronic Communication With Clients

    The majority of staff had used at least one form of electronic communication with their clients. Table 1 shows that the median number of electronic communication modes was 2 (range 0-5). More than half of staff had used email (40/59, 68%) and text messages (34/59, 58%) to communicate electronically with their clients. While 15 out of 59 staff at community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations (25%) who participated in our study had used social media (eg, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snap Chat) to communicate electronically with their clients, very few had used a mobile app (eg, What’s App; 9/59, 15%), web-enabled videoconference (eg, FaceTime, Skype; 5/59, 8%), or something else (ie, electronic medical record, healthnavigator website; 2/59, 3%). There were no statistically significant differences in the use of any mode of electronic communication with clients between staff who were completely or very confident that safeguards are in place to keep electronically shared information from being seen by other people when compared to those who were somewhat or a little confident (P=.24) (Table 2). Among the few (7/59, 12%) who did not communicate electronically with their clients, phone and mail were the preferred modes of communication.

    Future eHealth Communication With Clients

    Many staff were interested in using eHealth communication tools with their clients in the future. The median number of eHealth communication modes that community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff were interested in using with their clients in the future was 2 (range 0-4) (Table 1). Figure 1 and Table 2 show that more than half of staff were very interested in using eHealth communication tools in the future for sharing appointment reminders (38/57, 67%) and general health tips (34/56, 61%) with their clients. Almost half were very interested in using eHealth communication tools in the future to share HIV medication reminders with their clients (29/58, 50%), and 40% (23/57) were interested in using eHealth communication tools in the future to share vaccination reminders with their clients. There were also no statistically significant differences in interest in using eHealth communication tools with clients in the future between staff who were completely or very confident that safeguards are in place to keep electronically shared information from being seen by other people compared to those who were somewhat or a little confident (appointment reminders: P=.69, HIV medication reminders: P=.27, vaccination reminders: P=.13, general health tip: P=.40) (Table 2).

    ‎
    Figure 1. Community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations staff interest in using eHealth communication tools with clients in the future.
    View this figure

    Principal Findings

    The sample of community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff had some level of confidence that safeguards were in place to keep electronically shared information from being seen by other people. In fact, the majority were completely or very confident about the security of electronically shared information. Having at least some level of confidence about data security could probably be attributed to the fact that many of the community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff in the sample had used multiple modes of electronic communication with their clients. Only a few preferred to use phone or mail to communicate with their clients. Additionally, many community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff were very interested in using eHealth communication tools to remind their clients about appointments, medications, and vaccinations, as well as to share general health tips with them.

    According to recent data from the Pew Research Center, 90% of adults are online, which includes 81% who are online daily [24]. Of the adults who are online daily, 45% go online several times a day, and 28% are almost constantly online [24]. Although most adults are online, disparities exist among offline adults despite efforts to close the digital divide. Offline adults are more likely to be Hispanic or Black, older (ie, aged ≥65 years), lower socioeconomic status (ie, annual household income less than US $30,000; less than a high school diploma), and from rural communities [25]. People living with HIV share similar sociodemographic characteristics of offline adults such as racial or ethnic minority and lower socioeconomic status [26]. Unfortunately, these are the same characteristics of individuals who have been experiencing the digital divide in HIV/AIDS care for decades [27]. Chiasson and colleagues [28] concluded from their research study that

    HIV prevention and care programs using digital media have great potential to cost-effectively meet the complex needs of diverse and often underserved populations living with or at high risk of HIV
    [28]

    In this study, among the staff recruited from community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations located in South Carolina and Texas, more than half used email and text message to communicate with their clients. In addition to the vast number of US adults who are online, another contributing factor to this study's findings is the fact that most people living with HIV are men who have sex with men who, studies have shown, go online for health information and social networking [10]. Additionally, the fact that most of the community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff who participated in the study were completely or very confident that electronically shared information was protected and private is also a contributing factor to electronic communication with clients, and interest in eHealth communication with clients in the future.

    Study Strengths and Limitations

    This study adds to the scientific literature about eHealth communication among staff at community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations; however, there were some limitations. This cross-sectional study used self-reported data to describe eHealth communication attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. The findings are not generalizable to community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations either across the southern United States or the entire United States since this study only included staff at organizations that were located in only 2 states in the southern US Census region. Additionally, the author was unable to determine the response rate because the total number of employees working at each organization was not obtained from all of the community-based HIV/AIDS service organization leaders.

    Conclusion

    Staff at community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations will play a critical role in moving us forward toward realizing the goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy, which are aimed at improving health outcomes across the HIV care continuum. Many of the staff at community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations who participated in this study were either already using electronic communication or were very interested in using eHealth communication tools with their clients in the future. In fact, only 12% of staff had not used any form of electronic communication. More research is needed to better understand how to build the capacity of community-based HIV/AIDS service organizations and their staff to help their clients overcome communication inequalities that have the potential to negatively affect HIV/AIDS-related outcomes in these vulnerable populations.

    Public Health Implications

    The current pandemic is a prime example of how eHealth communication tools can be used to improve health outcomes along the HIV care continuum. Although many organizations were forced to close during shelter-in-place orders that were issued in response to rising coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) rates, as with all individuals, the health needs of people living with HIV continued. For individuals for whom community-based HIV/AIDS service organization staff are the only trusted source of information about health or medical topics, electronic communication has become a necessity.

    Acknowledgments

    Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (career development award number K01CA175239). The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, or the US Government.

    I would like to acknowledge my community partners for their time and valuable contributions made to the study. I would also like to acknowledge my research mentors (Drs. Heather M Brandt, Daniela B Friedman, Sandra H Glover, James R Hébert, and Marcia G Ory) for their mentoring and support during my career development award.

    Authors' Contributions

    LTW conceptualized and designed the study, collected the data, conducted the data analysis, interpreted the results, and drafted the manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Sociodemographic characteristics questionnaire.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 84 KB
    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 2

    eHealth communication questionnaire.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 220 KB
    1. White House Office of National AIDS Policy. National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States: Updated to 2020. 2015 Jul.   URL: https://www.hiv.gov/federal-response/national-hiv-aids-strategy/nhas-update [accessed 2019-11-16]
    2. Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res 2001 Jun;3(2):E20. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Shaw T, McGregor D, Brunner M, Keep M, Janssen A, Barnet S. What is eHealth (6)? Development of a Conceptual Model for eHealth: Qualitative Study with Key Informants. J Med Internet Res 2017 Oct 24;19(10):e324 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Understanding the HIV Care Continuum.   URL: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/factsheets/cdc-hiv-care-continuum.pdf [accessed 2020-07-07]
    5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services & Minority HIV/AIDS Fund. HIV Care Continuum.   URL: https://www.hiv.gov/federal-response/policies-issues/hiv-aids-care-continuum [accessed 2020-07-07]
    6. Dulli L, Ridgeway K, Packer C, Murray KR, Mumuni T, Plourde KF, et al. A Social Media-Based Support Group for Youth Living With HIV in Nigeria (SMART Connections): Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2020 Jun 02;22(6):e18343 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Winskell K, Sabben G, Akelo V, Ondeng'e K, Odero I, Mudhune V. A smartphone game to prevent HIV among young Kenyans: local perceptions of mechanisms of effect. Health Educ Res 2020 Jun 01;35(3):153-164. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Sun CJ, Anderson KM, Kuhn T, Mayer L, Klein CH. A Sexual Health Promotion App for Transgender Women (Trans Women Connected): Development and Usability Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020 May 12;8(5):e15888 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Côté J, Rouleau G, Ramirez-Garcia MP, Auger P, Thomas R, Leblanc J. Effectiveness of a Web-Based Intervention to Support Medication Adherence Among People Living With HIV: Web-Based Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020 Apr 20;6(2):e17733 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Bond KT, Ramos SR. Utilization of an Animated Electronic Health Video to Increase Knowledge of Post- and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Among African American Women: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey. JMIR Form Res 2019 May 29;3(2):e9995 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Winskell K, Sabben G, Obong'o C. Interactive Narrative in a Mobile Health Behavioral Intervention (Tumaini): Theoretical Grounding and Structure of a Smartphone Game to Prevent HIV Among Young Africans. JMIR Serious Games 2019 May 08;7(2):e13037 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Winskell K, Sabben G, Akelo V, Ondeng'e K, Obong'o C, Stephenson R, et al. A Smartphone Game-Based Intervention (Tumaini) to Prevent HIV Among Young Africans: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 Aug 01;6(8):e10482 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Cao B, Gupta S, Wang J, Hightow-Weidman LB, Muessig KE, Tang W, et al. Social Media Interventions to Promote HIV Testing, Linkage, Adherence, and Retention: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2017 Nov 24;19(11):e394 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Hersch RK, Cook RF, Billings DW, Kaplan S, Murray D, Safren S, et al. Test of a web-based program to improve adherence to HIV medications. AIDS Behav 2013 Nov;17(9):2963-2976 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Jacomet C, Ologeanu-Taddei R, Prouteau J, Lambert C, Linard F, Bastiani P, et al. Adoption and Attitudes of eHealth Among People Living With HIV and Their Physicians: Online Multicenter Questionnaire Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020 Apr 15;8(4):e16140 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Sabben G, Mudhune V, Ondeng'e K, Odero I, Ndivo R, Akelo V, et al. A Smartphone Game to Prevent HIV Among Young Africans (Tumaini): Assessing Intervention and Study Acceptability Among Adolescents and Their Parents in a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019 May 21;7(5):e13049 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Wu D, Tang W, Lu H, Zhang TP, Cao B, Ong JJ, et al. Leading by Example: Web-Based Sexual Health Influencers Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Have Higher HIV and Syphilis Testing Rates in China. J Med Internet Res 2019 Jan 21;21(1):e10171 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Han H, Hong H, Starbird LE, Ge S, Ford AD, Renda S, et al. eHealth Literacy in People Living with HIV: Systematic Review. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2018 Sep 10;4(3):e64 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Muessig KE, Bien CH, Wei C, Lo EJ, Yang M, Tucker JD, et al. A mixed-methods study on the acceptability of using eHealth for HIV prevention and sexual health care among men who have sex with men in China. J Med Internet Res 2015 Apr 21;17(4):e100 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Wigfall LT, Goodson P, Cunningham GB, Harvey IS, Gilreath TD, Adair M, et al. Understanding Community-based HIV/AIDS Service Organizations: An Invaluable Source of HPV-related Cancer Information for At-risk Populations. J Health Commun 2020;25(1):23-32. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Tomar A, Balcezak HC, Wigfall LT. HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer: Knowledge and attitude/beliefs among non-clinical staff at community-based HIV/AIDS Service Organizations (ASO) in the south United States (U.S.) census region. Health Soc Care Community 2020 May 28. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Wigfall LT, Bynum SA, Brandt HM, Sebastian N, Ory MG. HPV-Related Cancer Prevention and Control Programs at Community-Based HIV/AIDS Service Organizations: Implications for Future Engagement. Front. Oncol 2018 Oct 26;8. [CrossRef]
    23. National Cancer Institute. Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).   URL: https://hints.cancer.gov/ [accessed 2020-07-07]
    24. Perrin A, Kumar M. Pew Research Center. About Three-in-Ten U.S. Adults Say They Are 'Almost Constantly' Online. 2019 Jul 25.   URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/07/25/americans-going-online-almost-constantly/ [accessed 2019-11-18]
    25. Anderson M, Perrin A, Jiang J, Kumar M. Pew Research Center. 10% of Americans Don't Use the Internet. 2019 Apr 22.   URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/22/some-americans-dont-use-the-internet-who-are-they/ [accessed 2019-11-20]
    26. Centers for Disease Control Prevention. 24 (No 5). Diagnoses of HIV infection among adolescents and young adults in the United States and 6 dependent areas, 2012-2017. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report. 2019 Oct.   URL: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hivsurveillance.html [accessed 2019-11-20]
    27. Kalichman SC, Weinhardt L, Benotsch E, Cherry C. Closing the digital divide in HIV/AIDS care: development of a theory-based intervention to increase Internet access. AIDS Care 2002 Aug;14(4):523-537. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Chiasson MA, Hirshfield S, Rietmeijer C. HIV prevention and care in the digital age. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010 Dec;55 Suppl 2:S94-S97. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    AIDS: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
    HIV: human immunodeficiency virus
    STD: sexually transmitted disease

    Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 21.11.19; peer-reviewed by L Kaplan, D Felt; comments to author 12.05.20; revised version received 07.07.20; accepted 26.07.20; published 09.09.20

    Copyright

    ©Lisa Tisdale Wigfall. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 09.09.2020.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.