This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Formative Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions (2410) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) (288)

Published on in Vol 3, No 2 (2019): Apr-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/10880, first published .
AO Patient Outcomes Center: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Software Application for the Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopedic Outpatient Clinics

AO Patient Outcomes Center: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Software Application for the Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopedic Outpatient Clinics

AO Patient Outcomes Center: Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Software Application for the Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopedic Outpatient Clinics

Authors of this article:

Nan E Rothrock1 Author Orcid Image ;   Michael Bass1 Author Orcid Image ;   Andrea Blumenthal2 Author Orcid Image ;   Richard C Gershon1 Author Orcid Image ;   Beate Hanson3 Author Orcid Image ;   Alexander Joeris2 Author Orcid Image ;   Aaron Kaat1 Author Orcid Image ;   Suzanne Morrison4 Author Orcid Image ;   Robert V O'Toole5 Author Orcid Image ;   Shalini Patel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Michael Stover6 Author Orcid Image ;   Michael J Weaver4 Author Orcid Image ;   Raymond White7 Author Orcid Image ;   Maria Varela Diaz1 Author Orcid Image ;   Mark S Vrahas8 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (9) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Fischer K, De Faoite D, Rose M. Patient-reported outcomes feedback report for knee arthroplasty patients should present selective information in a simple design - findings of a qualitative study. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2020;4(1) View
  2. Walden A, Garvin L, Smerek M, Johnson C. User-centered design principles in the development of clinical research tools. Clinical Trials 2020;17(6):703 View
  3. Beletsky A, Lu Y, Nwachukwu B, Polce E, Maheshwer B, Chahla J, Forsythe B, Cole B, Verma N. Preoperative psychometric properties of visual analog scale asessments for function, pain, and strength compared with legacy upper extremity outcome measures in glenohumeral osteoarthritis. JSES International 2020;4(3):443 View
  4. van Muilekom M, Luijten M, van Oers H, Terwee C, van Litsenburg R, Roorda L, Grootenhuis M, Haverman L. From statistics to clinics: the visual feedback of PROMIS® CATs. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2021;5(1) View
  5. Yedulla N, Hester J, Patel M, Cross A, Peterson E, Makhni E. Pre-Visit Digital Messaging Improves Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Participation Prior to the Orthopaedic Ambulatory Visit. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2023;105(1):20 View
  6. Sokas C, Hu F, Edelen M, Sisodia R, Pusic A, Cooper Z. A Review of PROM Implementation in Surgical Practice. Annals of Surgery 2022;275(1):85 View
  7. Chaudhury A, Bernstein D, Harper C, Hammert W, Rozental T. Bringing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Into Practice: A Review of the Latest Developments in PROM Use in the Evaluation and Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online 2023;5(4):492 View
  8. Horn M, George S, Goode A, Reinke E, Scott L, Bolognesi M. Can Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Measures Differentiate Patients Who Will Undergo Hip and Knee Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2022;37(6):S56 View
  9. Braaksma C, Wolterbeek N, Veen M, Poolman R, Pronk Y, Klaassen A, Ostelo R, Terwee C. Assessing the measurement properties of PROMIS Computer Adaptive Tests, short forms and legacy patient reported outcome measures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2024;8(1) View