e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 643 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
CSV download: Download all 643 search results
(up to 5,000 articles maximum)
- 164 JMIR Formative Research
- 144 JMIR Human Factors
- 81 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 50 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 35 JMIR Research Protocols
- 27 JMIR Serious Games
- 24 JMIR Aging
- 21 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 16 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 14 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 12 JMIR Cancer
- 10 JMIR Mental Health
- 8 JMIR Medical Education
- 7 JMIR Cardio
- 5 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 3 Iproceedings
- 3 JMIR Nursing
- 3 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 2 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 2 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 2 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Diabetes
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
Examining Technology Perspectives of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Scoping Review
Quantitative data about usability, acceptability, and user experience (UX) were typically gathered using questionnaires with responses on a Likert-type scale.
Over a third (n=32) of solutions provide cognitive training in the form of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT; n=21), a combination of CBT and physical training (n=9), or CBT and cognitive assessment (n=2).
JMIR Aging 2025;8:e78229
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Usability was measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a validated scale that measures user ratings of product usability through 10 statements [25]. Its final score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher usability. Finally, we measured uptake of HIV prevention strategies during the study period, including Pr EP initiation and HIV testing.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e74208
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For example, the quantitative and qualitative usability findings were compared to provide a richer understanding of usability for our study population.
We measured usability (fit between user and technology) using 3 different methods. The e Health literacy assessment tool measures user confidence with technology across 3 domains: using a computer, using a touchscreen, and finding information online [22]. We measured usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS) and semistructured interviews [23].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e66932
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This paper presents a pilot study of the usability of a newly developed SG (“Digimenz”) for older patients, promoting participative development. Usability in the context of dementia care has previously been operationalized by the ISO 9241 model [30,33]. It defines usability in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and user experience. The ability to learn the handling of software is also a common part of different usability definitions [34].
JMIR Serious Games 2025;13:e69812
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
For a comprehensive evaluation of the usability of the app, we used qualitative and quantitative measurements. User data provided insights into objective usage engagement, while qualitative data highlighted usability needs and identified issues for further improvement [30].
Thinking aloud tests were used to gain insights into the ease of use and navigation experiences with the app [31,32].
JMIR Pediatr Parent 2025;8:e75569
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A recent systematic literature review by An et al [19] reported studies of e Health applications comparing traditional interventions to HCD interventions, where the latter showed greater satisfaction, usability, and effectiveness.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e74067
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
usabilityDesign and Usability of Consumer Health Tech and Home Monitoring Devices Usability of Apps and User Perceptions of mHealth Human Factors and Usability Case Studies Design and Usability of Clinical Software and EHRs
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e65815
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
While the accuracy, reliability, and usability of apps for the 6 MWT have been examined in research [9,10,17-19], little is known about the usefulness of app-based measurements in a clinical context. The usefulness of the 6 MWT is commonly assessed retrospectively by investigating the relationship between walked distance and clinical variables, including hospitalizations, quality of life, or response to therapy [20].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e70495
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Conducting feasibility and usability testing for a VR training program is considered a prerequisite for its successful implementation [34]. For the implementation of VR training in older adults, the significance of usability is underscored by age-related factors that contribute to barriers in use [34]. Consequently, considering the perspective of professionals may improve the applicability of VR training for older adults [35].
JMIR Serious Games 2025;13:e66673
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Existing studies often examine these technologies independently rather than comparatively, and many are qualitative in nature, resulting in a significant research gap regarding the relative benefits, usability, and acceptance of social robots compared to more conventional technological devices [16,17].
JMIR Serious Games 2025;13:e76209
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS