e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 257 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 99 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 53 JMIR Infodemiology
- 42 JMIR Formative Research
- 20 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 11 JMIR Dermatology
- 10 JMIR Research Protocols
- 7 JMIRx Med
- 5 JMIR Cancer
- 4 JMIR Human Factors
- 2 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
E-cigarette–related misinformation is widely shared on social media, which can lower perceived health risks and undermine adolescents’ and young adults’ quit attempts [1]. As extensive social media use is associated with e-cigarette use among adolescents and young adults [2-4], and seeking information about e-cigarettes predicts future use [5], it is crucial that the information being accessed is accurate and up to date.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e73193
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
As misinformation became more prevalent on social media, exacerbated by the terming of “fake news” and a global pandemic, more research was conducted on clarifying the definition of misinformation and classifying the different kinds of misinformation. The term “misinformation” is often used interchangeably with related concepts such as spam, rumors, fake news, and disinformation.
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e57951
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The Impact of Misinformation on Social Media in the Context of Natural Disasters: Narrative Review
This rapid onset and escalation of natural disasters can amplify the spread of misinformation on social media platforms in unique ways. For this reason, examining misinformation specifically within the context of natural disasters offers valuable insights into the role of social media in crisis communication.
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e70413
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Cancer misinformation can negatively impact health outcomes and increase mortality risk if patients forgo conventional cancer treatment for unproven alternatives [7,8]. These risks demonstrate an urgency to strengthen the growing field of online cancer misinformation scholarship.
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e65887
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Efforts to address concerns and highlight the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines have been met with significant challenges, as the spread of misinformation on social media has hindered vaccine uptake [6].
As a result, multiple strategies have been implemented to identify vaccine misinformation.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65361
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Challenges such as the risk of disseminating misinformation, lack of personalization, and ethical concerns related to patient privacy have been noted [18-20].
Oncologists are at the forefront of cancer care. They serve as clinical decision makers and trusted advisors in patient education. Their role has evolved to include guiding patients through increasingly complex treatment options and emerging digital health tools.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71418
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Interventions to Counter Health Misinformation Among Older People: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Misinformation and disinformation in health are significant issues because they undermine trust in public health authorities, scientists, and governments [1-4]. Health misinformation encompasses information that deviates from the established scientific consensus about a phenomenon [5]. Conversely, disinformation involves the intentional spread of inaccurate information with the aim of misleading or causing harm, while misinformation, although still incorrect, is shared without malicious intent [6].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e74138
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
It was shown that town-level fragmentation of these networks is associated with the spread of misinformation about COVID-19 and the share of fake statements encountered by respondents. The results remain robust after controlling for individual characteristics, including the use of online and traditional media, fear of COVID-19, and household experience with the disease. This study contributes to the growing literature on the spread of health misinformation on social media [23].
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e58302
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Disinformation differs from misinformation and is defined as false information accidentally disseminated, without malicious intent [4]. This is different from misinformation that implies a deceptive aim. These falsehoods can take various forms, such as promoting untested remedies or treatments, voicing inaccurate health claims, and propagating conspiracy theories about illnesses, climate change, and vaccines [6].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64225
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Although studies have been emerging since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic that have addressed misinformation sources, channels, and messages [28-31], in general, less attention has been paid to the exhaustive characterization of the profiles of people who embrace misinformation and particularly understanding which messages have penetrated the audiences.
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e69945
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS