e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 244 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 95 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 49 JMIR Infodemiology
- 39 JMIR Formative Research
- 20 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 11 JMIR Dermatology
- 9 JMIR Research Protocols
- 7 JMIRx Med
- 4 JMIR Cancer
- 4 JMIR Human Factors
- 2 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
The Quality of Dermatology Match Information on Social Media Platforms: Cross-Sectional Analysis
Program director surveys could help clarify common misconceptions, and efforts to correct misinformation through trusted sources may improve the accuracy of information available to applicants. Applicants seeking reliable guidance should turn to established mentorship programs, such as the National Mentorship Match through the Dermatology Interest Group Association, and official recommendations from the APD.
JMIR Dermatol 2025;8:e65217
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Indeed, prior work suggests antivaccine sentiment generates more engagement than provaccine sentiment [20] and that exposure to misinformation can decrease intent to vaccinate [12,21,22]. However, there are still relatively few papers that use panel data to investigate the relationship between social media use and vaccine preferences, and our understanding of this relationship is still limited.
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e66081
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
However, the surge in these informational needs overlapped with the rapid spread of misinformation and false news through social media platforms, leading to widespread public confusion.
The WHO used the term “infodemic” to describe the spread of misinformation during the pandemic [1]. They emphasized the potential threat that such misinformation posed to national epidemic prevention policies.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e73601
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In the HPV antivaccine network, the main traits of social media misinformation messages included mentioning #Gardasil, claiming to reveal a lie, conspiracy theories, and risk of vaccine injury [22].
Previous research has documented the amount of misinformation about the HPV vaccine on social media, the most prevalent misinformation, and it has documented the ways that vaccine misinformation impacts vaccination attitudes and behavior.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e54657
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Infodemic Versus Viral Information Spread: Key Differences and Open Challenges
It started from being an “epidemic of information,” as defined by Rothkopf in 2003 [1] in the context of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak, to then include the element of misinformation [2-4], especially when the concept gained momentum during the COVID-19 pandemic.
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e57455
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The COVID-19 pandemic has been accompanied by an “infodemic,” characterized by the rapid spread of misinformation and disinformation, significantly undermining public health efforts [1]. Misinformation refers to the unintentional spread of incorrect or misleading information [2], while disinformation involves deliberately disseminating false information to deceive [3].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66098
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Addressing these barriers in resource-limited countries requires targeted strategies such as improving health literacy, offering culturally sensitive health care education, increasing access to technology, and combating misinformation [21].
Among these targeted strategies, social media has gained the most attention in the high-income world [20]. Health care education through social media has become an increasingly effective method for reaching diverse audiences with health information.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e65745
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This sentiment analysis focuses on Twitter discussions about ivermectin, showing public opinion that, while not devoid of misinformation risks, these discussions offer an alternative lens to understand the societal pulse on this contentious topic [6]. By examining the sentiments expressed on Twitter, we aim to add nuance to the ongoing discourse, acknowledging the platform's influence on public perception and its implications for health communication strategies.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e50536
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
As of April 2022, 24% of COVID-19 mortality, or 234,000 deaths, was vaccine-preventable [2], and misinformation and disinformation cost the United States between US $50,000,000 and US $300,000,000 each day during the pandemic in health care spending and economic losses [3]. These impacts demonstrated the necessity of addressing misinformation as part of public health responses [4].
JMIR Infodemiology 2025;5:e67119
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The growing dominance of social media as a news source has resulted in not only widespread engagement with science but also a perpetuation of medical misinformation in fields ranging from dementia [1] to cardiology [2] and cancer [3,4] and beyond.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e64679
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS