Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 10 of 70 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


Recruiting Asian Americans for Online Studies: Methodological Systematic Review

Recruiting Asian Americans for Online Studies: Methodological Systematic Review

The research team consisted of 3 nurse researchers with expertise in cross-cultural research, survey methodology, and systematic reviews. We had substantial research experience working with Asian American populations and were well-versed in the systematic review process. Additionally, we consulted with a university-affiliated health sciences librarian who had expertise in systematic review methodology.

Fang Lei, Fei-fei Huang, Ying Jiang

J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e71765

Diagnostic Decision-Making Variability Between Novice and Expert Optometrists for Glaucoma: Comparative Analysis to Inform AI System Design

Diagnostic Decision-Making Variability Between Novice and Expert Optometrists for Glaucoma: Comparative Analysis to Inform AI System Design

This section details our research methodology investigating variations in optometrists’ decision-making. It begins with an in-depth explanation of the data collection process, emphasizing the criteria and methods used for selection. Subsequently, the stages of data refinement and processing are outlined. Optometrist interviews are discussed, covering outreach strategies, interview platforms, and participant demographics.

Faisal Ghaffar, Nadine M. Furtado, Imad Ali, Catherine Burns

JMIR Med Inform 2025;13:e63109

Methods Used in Co-Creation Within the Health CASCADE Co-Creation Database and Gray Literature: Systematic Methods Overview

Methods Used in Co-Creation Within the Health CASCADE Co-Creation Database and Gray Literature: Systematic Methods Overview

There is a growing recognition of co-creation as a valuable methodology, yet, to date, there is no common practice or standardized approach [1,11]. Co-creation has increasing traction in terms of involving stakeholders, but the extent to which this creates a fundamental change in practices is still unclear, and there is a strong potential that it will remain tokenistic [12]. Major challenges remain and need to be confronted to make co-creation trustworthy and unlock its full potential [1,2,11-13].

Danielle Marie Agnello, George Balaskas, Artur Steiner, Sebastien Chastin

Interact J Med Res 2024;13:e59772

Investigating Data Diversity and Model Robustness of AI Applications in Palliative Care and Hospice: Protocol for Scoping Review

Investigating Data Diversity and Model Robustness of AI Applications in Palliative Care and Hospice: Protocol for Scoping Review

Our methodology, grounded in a scoping review framework and encompassing interdisciplinary databases, is thorough. The diverse team of researchers involved in this study will analyze and interpret findings, which are expected to stimulate further discussions and guide future research, particularly focusing on AI applications for vulnerable adults requiring palliative and hospice care.

Selen Bozkurt, Soraya Fereydooni, Irem Kar, Catherine Diop Chalmers, Sharon L Leslie, Ravi Pathak, Anne Walling, Charlotta Lindvall, Karl Lorenz, Tammie Quest, Karleen Giannitrapani, Dio Kavalieratos

JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e56353

Artificial Intelligence–Augmented Clinical Decision Support Systems for Pregnancy Care: Systematic Review

Artificial Intelligence–Augmented Clinical Decision Support Systems for Pregnancy Care: Systematic Review

In this study, we assessed related studies by their health care applications, CDSS functionality, AI methodology, and clinical implementation with the goal of providing the state of the art of studies, as well as summarizing advantages, limitations, and possible future directions. Overall, we have identified 30 related studies published between 1994 and 2022 with an upward trend. There was a notable increase starting in 2021.

Xinnian Lin, Chen Liang, Jihong Liu, Tianchu Lyu, Nadia Ghumman, Berry Campbell

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e54737