e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 5 of 5 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 2 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Another strength of this study was the use of Perf OMs that can collect several measurements quickly, ecologically, and longitudinally. This means that the construct should be captured more precisely, more reflective of pathology in the patient’s natural environment, and potentially more responsive to intervention. In the future, these hypotheses will be formally assessed via further clinimetric studies.
Despite its conscientious design, this study has limitations.
JMIR Neurotech 2024;3:e52832
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Additionally, because existing health literacy scales rely on subjective measurements, it is impossible to know how an individual’s responses relate to actual skill level, whereas objective tests can directly measure an individual’s skills [9,10]. Motivated by this, our study endeavors to construct and validate a scale measuring digital health readiness consisting of subjective and objective questions.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e58497
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Yet, to cement their research utility, two aspects of these digital measurements need to be properly characterized: (1) the accuracy with which a digital measurement reads the parameters of interest [9] and (2) the amount of aggregated data needed to reliably capture an individual’s underlying behavioral state, minimizing noise related to natural variability, which usually translates into an aggregation time period for data collection (time to reliability).
JMIR Hum Factors 2023;10:e48270
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Objective measurements, such as biomarkers, are not influenced by the participant’s personal beliefs or perceptions. However, biomarkers do not cover all components of the diet and are affected by absorption and metabolism; hence, they are not always suitable or feasible and are dependent on the study context [7]. Self-report tools, such as FFQs assessing habitual intake, food records, or dietary recalls are noninvasive and usually feasible to use in a variety of research settings.
JMIR Form Res 2022;6(3):e35092
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Precise definitions and measurements for engagement will allow for better estimation of DBCI effectiveness and provide accurate insights that inform relevant intervention recommendations [4].
JMIR Form Res 2019;3(4):e14052
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS