e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 189 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 76 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 18 JMIR Mental Health
- 18 JMIR Research Protocols
- 13 JMIR Medical Education
- 12 JMIR Formative Research
- 7 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 6 JMIR AI
- 6 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 5 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 3 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 3 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 3 JMIR Serious Games
- 2 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 2 JMIR Aging
- 2 JMIR Cancer
- 2 JMIR Human Factors
- 2 JMIR Infodemiology
- 2 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 2 JMIR Nursing
- 2 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
The main barriers are validation, usability, utility, and ethics [24]. More global research is still needed to generate more data on the use of AI in medicine. Only after extensive proof of superiority will its use be legalized [25]. Utility refers to the functionality of a tool being studied and improved through research and its use in various functions, while usability refers to the ability of health care professionals to use the tool to achieve satisfactory results [25].
JMIR AI 2025;4:e66552
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The complexity of ethics, lack of targeted guidance for interdisciplinary teams, and absence of comprehensive reviews of evaluation research practices provide the rationale for this scoping review. These issues are explored in detail in the following sections and further elaborated in the proposed review, using evaluations of RPM in cancer and cardiovascular care as practical case studies.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e60849
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Prognostic Disclosure in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Protocol for a Scoping Review
Reference 10: Intended and unintended consequences: Ethics, communication, and prognostic disclosureethics
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e57256
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This human participant research was approved by the appropriate University College Dublin (UCD) research ethics committee (UCD School of Information and Communication Studies Taught Masters Research Ethics Committee).
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e67114
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Reference 17: WHO Code of Ethics(https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-code-of-ethics)ethics
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e66639
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This paper provides a detailed overview of the ethics of data-driven DSTs because of the link to a particular project, as well as reference to broader ethical aspects (eg, the ethics of interdisciplinary collaboration or psychological safety in research teams) that are often neglected. We find that this work has relevance beyond the 4 D PICTURE project as it is the first review-type paper explicitly grounded in the Embedded Ethics approach.
JMIR Cancer 2025;11:e65566
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Factors Influencing Information Distortion in Electronic Nursing Records: Qualitative Study
Examples of information ethics issues include information disclosure, distortion, alienation, and injustice [3]. Among these, information distortion undermines data accuracy, posing immediate health risks and directly threatening patient safety, which demands significant attention [3].
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e66959
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In this paper we explore how these barriers perpetuate health inequities, examine the ethical dimensions of data sharing, and argue for a “share by default” model that aligns with public health ethics, respects Tribal sovereignty, and ensures the provision of timely, actionable information for American Indian and Alaska Native communities.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e70983
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We obtained institutional review board approval to conduct the study from KAU’s Ethics Committee (reference #414-‐22). The online survey began with an informed consent statement that explained the purpose of the questionnaire and assured participants that all information would be kept confidential with no names or contact details recorded in the survey. Participation was entirely voluntary, with no reward for completing the survey and no penalty for choosing not to participate.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e57812
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS