e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 306 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 105 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 53 JMIR Formative Research
- 48 JMIR Research Protocols
- 21 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 17 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 12 JMIR Human Factors
- 12 JMIR Mental Health
- 10 JMIR Medical Education
- 4 JMIR Diabetes
- 4 JMIR Serious Games
- 3 JMIR Cardio
- 3 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 3 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 2 JMIR Cancer
- 1 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 1 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 1 Iproceedings
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 1 JMIR Dermatology
- 1 JMIR Infodemiology
- 1 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
The consortium’s objectives include (1) addressing ethical and legal requirements for the use of data from different sources for the CPM; (2) creating a CPM that incorporates both conventional and specific, attainable nonconventional risk factors; (3) cocreating with health care professionals and patients to realize a personalized artificial intelligence–driven e Health solution (e Coach) in the CVRM health care plan; and (4) evaluating the effectiveness of this e Health solution in primary care settings.
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e66068
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
However, Brandt et al [13] conclude that further research on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of such technologies is warranted. In line with this, the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport has emphasized the importance of evaluating the impact of innovative technologies in disability care settings to ensure that they are both effective and financially sustainable [14]. Effectiveness studies measure the level of beneficial effect of interventions in “real-world” settings [15,16].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e67841
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Recent studies have assessed the effectiveness of m Health interventions targeting various mental health issues, including depression [6,7], suicide [8], schizophrenia [9], substance use disorders [10], and psychosis [11], among others [12].
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e58943
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This exceptional performance underscores the potential of ML to transform diagnostic pathology, especially given the rapid advancements in technology, availability, and cost-effectiveness of MLaa S platforms such as Google’s Vertex AI.
Previous AI applications in digital pathology, specifically in colorectal cancer screening, have shown great potential in increasing the efficiency and accuracy of diagnosis.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67457
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In recent years, mental health research has increased on CBT treatment provided via the internet and smartphones (ICBT) as an alternative to face-to-face CBT treatment [16,18-21], and the effectiveness of ICBT is reportedly no different from that of face-to-face CBT [22]. According to Aemissegger et al [23], the baseline characteristics of patients in internet-based and face-to-face intervention trials revealed no significant differences.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e60943
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
In this context, the minimum detectable change (MDC) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) are 2 key metrics and are pivotal for calculating clinical trial sample sizes and assessing the effectiveness of interventions [37,38]. On the one hand, MDC denotes the smallest change that can be confidently identified beyond the measurement error of the instrument used for a specific parameter [37].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e64213
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Therefore, the aim of the study is to explore the main barriers and facilitators that could be encountered in conducting a randomized clinical trial to study the effectiveness of the implementation of LLM models as tools to work on the clinical reasoning of physical therapy students.
This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the La Salle University Center for Advanced Studies, Madrid, Spain (CSEULS-PI-002/2025). This trial was registered in clinicaltrials.org (NCT06809634).
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e66126
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
To date, several models have been used to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of e-learning resources. The Kirkpatrick model, an outcome-focused model, has been widely employed to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational program across 4 levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and results [9]; however, it does not evaluate the implementation outcomes.
JMIR Med Educ 2025;11:e63882
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The review seeks to inform stakeholders about the demographic and socioeconomic factors influencing app usage, providing insights to improve app accessibility and effectiveness. This review addresses the following research questions (RQs).
RQ1: What are the key demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with health care app usage disparities?
RQ2: How do these factors influence the adoption and utilization of health care apps?
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e63596
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Thus, to showcase the clinical utility and effectiveness of assessing postoperative pain, the purpose of this study was to use the Pain Pad device to determine if tourniquet use during TKA has a detrimental effect on postoperative pain levels in the context of a modern multimodal pain pathway and early mobilization.
This research was approved under Integrated Research Application System (229503) and the Open University Human Research Ethics Committee (17/LO/1404).
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e65271
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS