e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 17 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 7 JMIR Research Protocols
- 3 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 2 JMIR Mental Health
- 2 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Nursing
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
The Delphi technique was chosen as the most appropriate study methodology to establish explicit consensus-based criteria where there is inadequate quantity or quality of existing evidence to develop evidence-based criteria [17]. Furthermore, the Delphi method is an iterative process technique that brings together the insights of various experts to establish a consensus and is used to generate future predictions, devise policy alternatives and find solutions.
JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e58389
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A survey and a consensus exercise were chosen for this project to address the diverse methodological challenges in m Health RCTs. Consensus methods allow for the integration of expert perspectives to produce recommendations. This approach is essential given the lack of consistent solutions to these challenges. The goal of the consensus exercise was to develop recommendations for researchers working in m Health.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e53187
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Throughout the consensus meetings, all items from the second Delphi round were subject to discussion and anonymous voting, facilitated by the Mentimeter platform [35]. The voting process was overseen by a chairman and observed by a designated observer. For an item to be ultimately included in the definitive guideline, a predefined threshold of 80% agreement among Consensus Group members was necessary, excluding abstentions and blank votes.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e56790
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This study aims to establish a key set of consensus-derived quality indicators for transition to adult care that are applicable across chronic physical, developmental, and mental health conditions, clinical care settings, and health jurisdictions.
JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e60860
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Consensus will be determined by whether over ≥75% of panelists agree on definition contents and risk relationships. A range of consensus statements will also be presented and evaluated by this same ≥75% consensus target. These statements will assess panelist agreement on the heterogeneity of patients who are immunosuppressed and their COVID-19 infection outcomes as well as the accuracy of the draft phenotypes (multilevel and high- vs low-risk categorized) that will be presented between e Delphi rounds.
JMIR Res Protoc 2024;13:e56271
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We used the consensus development panel (or consensus development conference [CDC]) approach [26,27] and followed the methodology described and used by the US National Institutes of Health [28] and the World Health Organization [26,29]. The CDCs were developed by the National Institutes of Health [26] and we chose this as it is a particularly effective consensus method for identifying broad areas of challenge and potential solutions.
JMIR Ment Health 2024;11:e57155
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Triangulating Truth and Reaching Consensus on Population Size, Prevalence, and More: Modeling Study
A forest plot of the prior, estimates, and consensus results (for both confidence scaled and unscaled) is also shown in Figure 2, with both the reported CIs for the estimates (solid) as well as the scaled CIs (dotted).
The Synthesis tab of the Shiny app, which includes the consensus estimate and a forest plot of the prior, the estimates, and the consensus estimate as well as the unaccounted-for variation.
JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e48738
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
As consensus-building processes are crucial in developing a reporting guideline as per the EQUATOR process [49], the prioritization of the PRECISE guideline items will occur using a modified Delphi process [47]. A modified Delphi process refers to a variation or adaptation of the traditional Delphi method. The Delphi method is a structured and iterative process used to gather insights and perspectives from a panel of experts to reach a consensus or make informed decisions [47,66].
JMIR Res Protoc 2023;12:e50463
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
COS development starts with the development of a long list of outcomes that is put through a consensus process to decide which outcomes are most important and should be included in the COS [8]. An important aspect of forming COS is to ensure representation among all stakeholder groups, including those living with the condition. This latter aspect is argued to be essential to supporting meaningful research [9].
JMIR Form Res 2021;5(2):e18732
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We acknowledge that further rounds of discussion may help with consensus, but time constraints render this infeasible.
Ethical approval was sought from the Queen Mary University of London, and approval was granted by the Queen Mary Ethics of Research Committee (reference: QMREC2018/48027).
Clinicians will be recruited via clinical networks, word of mouth, and social media. There is no definitive number of participants recommended for this style of study.
JMIR Res Protoc 2021;10(1):e21804
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS