e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 10 of 23 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
CSV download: Download all 23 search results
(up to 5,000 articles maximum)
- 7 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 5 JMIR Formative Research
- 4 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 3 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 JMIR Aging
- 1 JMIR Cancer
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
The need for cultural tailoring varied between the ethnic groups. South Asian Surinamese participants displayed strong adherence to their traditional dietary patterns (Q18 and Q19 in Multimedia Appendix 5), whereas the Turkish participants emphasized the significant diversity within Turkish dietary practices, even within Turkey itself (Q17 in Multimedia Appendix 5). This diversity facilitated their adaptation to new dietary habits, as they were already accustomed to cultural variation.
J Particip Med 2025;17:e76094
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The development of messages was grounded in self-determination theory [19] and was based on techniques for tailoring health promotion messages used in previous studies [20-22].
There were layered, two-way tailored message sets on appointment keeping that were repeated every 4 weeks. Therefore, if a participant joined the intervention at 14 weeks pregnant, for example, they would receive six sets of appointment-keeping messages over 22 weeks.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e59144
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
An important and understudied element of intervention design is tailoring technologies based on elements such as the race, ethnicity, and language with which people identify. Tailoring is defined as any combination of techniques and information designed to target a single person based on traits that are unique to that person and connected to the desired outcome that is generated through an individual evaluation [7].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e73705
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Tailoring refers to the optimization of communication and functionality based on assessable characteristics unique to that individual. Choosing tailoring tactics, guided by theoretical and empirical evidence, can lead to better understanding and uptake of information and subsequently increased efficacy of the intervention [9].
Regarding health literacy, especially the strategy of content matching, seems important.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e76172
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Tailoring involves selecting intervention content that corresponds to participant characteristics such as beliefs, identity, or readiness to change that can influence the success of a behavior change intervention and provide relevant content in the moments it is needed most [25,34-36].
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e53566
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Therefore, tailoring PA-fostering JITAIs based on PSCF comes with a considerable risk of misaligning intervention timing and content with users’ current states. Misaligned interventions may annoy users or could hinder engagement leading to drop out from JITAI use [9,14]. In literature, self-report measures of momentary affect and motivation have been shown to be closely related to actual PA [15,16].
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e57255
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
mHealth Apps for Dementia Caregivers: Systematic Examination of Mobile Apps
Thus, it is critical to systematically examine m Health apps for their information provision and tailoring, as a first step in assessing their effectiveness for the support of caregivers.
In the use of m Health apps to tailor support [40,41], three strategies for tailoring are common: (1) Personalization—strategies that convey “explicitly or implicitly, that the communication is designed specifically” for an individual [42].
JMIR Aging 2024;7:e58517
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Reference 13: Tailoring: what's in a name?tailoring
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e47774
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
This is referred to as tailoring and personalization in the context of e Health technologies. Personalization and tailoring seem to be logical ways to overcome suboptimal effectiveness, but there is no clear agreement on how to define personalization and tailoring and what the differences and similarities are. In addition, it remains unclear how personalization and tailoring are being applied and can be applied to e Health technologies.
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e50497
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
A Multidimensional Approach for Evaluating Reality in Social Media: Mixed Methods Study
tailoring
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e52058
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS