e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 3 of 3 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)

Toward a New Conceptual Framework for Digital Mental Health Technologies: Scoping Review
Clearer frameworks for categorization could also have benefits within research and evaluation, including health technology assessment (HTA). To conduct systematic reviews and economic evaluations of DMHTs, one must understand whether technologies are similar enough to be compared. This is important to help determine if assumptions of similarity can be met within meta-analysis or to inform subgroup analyses [8].
JMIR Ment Health 2025;12:e63484
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Given the complexity and specificity of the RADS categorization, our investigation emphasizes different prompt impacts to assess chatbot capabilities and potential performance enhancement through refined prompting tuning.
In this study, our primary objective was to meticulously evaluate the performance of 3 LLMs (GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Claude-2) for RADS categorization using different prompt-tuning strategies.
JMIR Med Inform 2024;12:e55799
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS

Its performance will be compared against our own categorization of the patients, performed by the refractive surgeon in charge of their treatment (author AĆ). The actual selection of the parameters to be used for categorization is a deliberate starting point and is motivated by being concise but sufficient for a clinician to decide upon their categorization as offered.
JMIR Form Res 2023;7:e51798
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS