Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 3 of 3 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


Effectiveness of a Smartphone-Based Stress Management Program for Depression in Hospital Nurses During COVID-19 in Vietnam and Thailand: 2-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of a Smartphone-Based Stress Management Program for Depression in Hospital Nurses During COVID-19 in Vietnam and Thailand: 2-Arm Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial

Statistical tests (χ2 tests and 2-sided t tests) indicated that the demographic differences were not significant (P for differences ranged from .17 to .87). Characteristics of the participants at baseline. a N/A: not applicable. b As of March 2022, US $1=₫22,830. c As of March 2022, US $1=THB 33. d DASS21: Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 items. In both groups, the average scores of depression at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups were lower than those at the baseline (Table 2).

Kazuhiro Watanabe, Thuy Thi Thu Tran, Narisara Sripo, Asuka Sakuraya, Kotaro Imamura, Plernpit Boonyamalik, Natsu Sasaki, Thanate Tienthong, Hiroki Asaoka, Mako Iida, Quynh Thuy Nguyen, Nga Thi Nguyen, Son Thai Vu, Thuy Thi Ngo, Tham Thi Luyen, Long Duc Nguyen, Nga Thi Viet Nguyen, Binh Thanh Nguyen, Yutaka Matsuyama, Yukie Takemura, Daisuke Nishi, Akizumi Tsutsumi, Huong Thanh Nguyen, Orawan Kaewboonchoo, Norito Kawakami

J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e50071

Effects of Smartphone-Based Stress Management on Improving Work Engagement Among Nurses in Vietnam: Secondary Analysis of a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Smartphone-Based Stress Management on Improving Work Engagement Among Nurses in Vietnam: Secondary Analysis of a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial

Program B showed a significant estimated effect for improving work engagement at 3 months (t=1.97, P=.049, d=0.16; 95% CI 0.001 to 0.43). On the other hand, program A showed a nonsignificant trend (t=1.82, P=.069, d=0.13; 95% CI –0.014 to 0.41) toward improved work engagement at 3 months. At 7 months, neither program showed a significant effect (program A: t=0.02, P=.98, d=–0.004; 95% CI –0.17 to 0.16; program B: t=0.65, P=.52, d=0.05; 95% CI –0.11 to 0.21).

Natsu Sasaki, Kotaro Imamura, Thuy Thi Thu Tran, Huong Thanh Nguyen, Kazuto Kuribayashi, Asuka Sakuraya, Thu Minh Bui, Quynh Thuy Nguyen, Nga Thi Nguyen, Giang Thi Huong Nguyen, Melvyn Weibin Zhang, Harry Minas, Yuki Sekiya, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Akizumi Tsutsumi, Akihito Shimazu, Norito Kawakami

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(2):e20445