e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 3 of 3 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
CSV download: Download all 3 search results
(up to 5,000 articles maximum)
- 2 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Usability and Quality of the JoyPop App: Prospective Evaluation Study
Measures designed specifically for apps, such as the Mobile Application Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) [43], are rarely used [42,46]. Usability evaluations with validated and standardized measures developed for apps are recommended [43,46].
Evaluating the quality (eg, effectiveness, credibility, reliability, and safety) of mental health apps is also essential.
JMIR Hum Factors 2025;12:e65472
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The objective of this study is to review and compare the usability of existing estimations of CVD risk apps using the m Health App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). Rather than focusing on traditional usability aspects related to user interaction design, this study assesses how effectively these apps adhere to usability standards as defined by the MAUQ.
This review used quantitative research methodology to review and compare the usability of existing estimations of CVD risk apps.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2025;13:e56466
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
We also hypothesized an acceptable construct validity, defined based on relations between the ita-MAUQ and another standardized usability scale, and differences in known-groups.
The MAUQ was first developed by Zhou and colleagues [18]. MAUQ is designed for different users (patients or health care providers) and different interaction modes (interactive or stand-alone). For study purposes, the patient version for stand-alone m Health apps was used.
JMIR Hum Factors 2024;11:e58079
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS