Search Articles

View query in Help articles search

Search Results (1 to 2 of 2 Results)

Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS


A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study

A Tool to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals (CAPOCI): Design and Validation Study

Health information for professionals differs at this point from health information for the lay public, and consequently the initiatives to evaluate health information for patients (eg, e-Health Code of Ethics [16], Health on the Net [17], Journal of the American Medical Association [18], and DISCERN [19]) are not suitable for the evaluation of POC information for professionals. A standard tool to evaluate the trustworthiness of POC information that is not a guideline is therefore essential.

Gerlinde Lenaerts, Geertruida E Bekkering, Martine Goossens, Leen De Coninck, Nicolas Delvaux, Sam Cordyn, Jef Adriaenssens, Bert Aertgeerts, Patrik Vankrunkelsven

J Med Internet Res 2021;23(10):e27174

Tools to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review

Tools to Assess the Trustworthiness of Evidence-Based Point-of-Care Information for Health Care Professionals: Systematic Review

Mesh-terms: health information systems; point-of-care systems; medical informatics, consumer health informatics; Free-text words: (web-based or electronic or online or internet) and health information; e-Health, e-Health information, point-of-care services, point-of-care information We included all studies, reports, websites, or methodologies that reported on tools, including checklists and criteria, to assess the trustworthiness of medical information for health care professionals.

Gerlinde Lenaerts, Geertruida E Bekkering, Martine Goossens, Leen De Coninck, Nicolas Delvaux, Sam Cordyn, Jef Adriaenssens, Patrick Vankrunkelsven

J Med Internet Res 2020;22(1):e15415