Search Results (1 to 10 of 47 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 10 JMIR Research Protocols
- 9 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 8 JMIR Formative Research
- 4 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 3 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 3 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 2 JMIR Cancer
- 2 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 2 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 1 JMIR AI
- 1 JMIR Data
- 1 JMIR Human Factors
- 1 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Mitochondrial Fitness Science Communication for Aging Adults: Prospective Formative Pilot Study
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e64437
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

Conflicts of Interest Publication Disclosures: Descriptive Study
JMIR Data 2024;5:e57779
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section

The mode of delivery including the provider, intensity, and duration was based on previous feasibility findings from participants and instructors of PEDAL2 reported by Bourne et al [40] and from feedback from the CRANK PPI group (n=10) and cycling instructors (n=5). Feedback was elicited through web-based open group discussions. The modes of intervention implementation were considered using the APEASE criteria to assess suitability within the constraints and resources of the trial.
JMIR Cancer 2024;10:e54785
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section